Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 22
March 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Not enough links to have a viable navigation template The Banner talk 22:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough active links to provide useful navigation. Also, per recent RFC, {{ill}} links should not be in navboxes. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not enough english WP links.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Question: How many articles does it need to reach the standard of "enough"? Maybe some improvement can be done before it is deleted.--Howard61313 (talk) 20:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused template which doesn't do what it says on the tin. It looks more like a single-use category header. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- delete, looks like an experiment. Frietjes (talk) 21:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 1. Primefac (talk) 03:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:American Stanley Cup Finals television announcers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was subst and delete. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 14:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:AC/DC timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only used on "List of members" page, removes text from page, and can easily be substituted and deleted. Primefac (talk) 01:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- merge with the article', single-use template. Frietjes (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge - with List of AC/DC band members#Timeline per single-use template. - Mlpearc (open channel) 13:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with the article. No need for a template. Laurdecl talk 12:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with the article. Appears to be non-standard to have a template for the band personnel timeline. Adds extra steps to edit timeline. Mburrell (talk) 23:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 1. Primefac (talk) 03:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).