User talk:Keresluna

Hello!

Your GA nomination of Silver chloride

The article Silver chloride you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silver chloride for comments about the article, and Talk:Silver chloride/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Neptunium(IV) oxalate.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Neptunium(IV) oxalate.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 23:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Uranocene crystals.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Uranocene crystals.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Americium(III) nitrate.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Americium(III) nitrate.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Plutonocene.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Plutonocene.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Californium(III) chloride.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Californium(III) chloride.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The GA Review

Hi there, I see that you are reviewing the article I nominated for GA, and I noticed for 2C, you put that there are massive amounts of uncited text. However, the citations are located within the paragraphs, and inline citations are generally placed either in the text or at the end. Let me know your thoughts and I'll respond back ASAP. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zinc chloride

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zinc chloride you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zinc chloride

The article Zinc chloride you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zinc chloride for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Interstate 85 in North Carolina

Interstate 85 in North Carolina has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. RoySmith (talk) 20:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Radium

I saw your GA nomination of Radium did not succeed in 2022. I have started some work to copyedit, repair and update information across the article - once I am done would it be alright if I made the nomination, or do you want to re-nominate since you put a lot of work into this already and are familiar with sources? Recon rabbit 14:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also a note, the Modern applications section is way more technical than the rest of the article in my perspective. It looks like it's been there a while, do you have any idea on how it could be improved? Any familiarity with "breaking forces" I am missing? Recon rabbit 17:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for improving the article Radium! I am pretty busy right now with studies, so I won't have time to look over a GAN. You are more than free to nominate it yourself. Thank you! Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 15:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great! I am looking to restore many of the elements to GA-rating in the coming months. Radium and Radon seem the closest to completion in my ability. Your work is always appreciated. Recon rabbit 15:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]