User talk:Kelvintjy

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Taiseki-ji: Shōhondō edits

The information about the architects' opinions on the destruction of Shōhondō reflects Sōka Gakkai bias and does not, in my opinion, merit placement on the page. --Scandiescot — Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 13 September 2013‎

The temple was in fact regarded as a masterpiece of modern architecture, and architects in Japan and elsewhere did in fact deplore its demolition. There is nothing biased about reporting these facts. I located an archive of the Washington Post article, and put that paragraph back into the Shōhondō section. --Margin1522 (talk) 11:47, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

= Soka Gakkai Educational activities

I know you have edited the section on "educational activities" on the Soka Gakkai page. Are you the one responsible for the new "Soka Education System" page? If so - nice going. If not -- check it out. Thanks. --Daveler16 (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITEKILL

This is the second time you've added numerous superfluous references to the Soka Gakkai article. Please read WP:CITEKILL and adhere to it moving forward. Three or four is more than enough. wound theology ◈ 06:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvintjy : you also have been modifying the Daisaku Ikeda article without any arguments of using the "Talk" page. The change you made there (change = just getting back to an older version) does not respect several WP rules, among which the most important : NPOV. For instance, writing that Ikeda was a controversial leader is not an opinion, it's just a fact, it's sourced, and I am wondering what reasons you may have to censore this. Also, if you are a member of an organization and act on WP without being honnest about it, that is another rule you are breaking. Raoul mishima (talk) 14:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GrayStorm^{(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.)} 01:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soka Gakkai International

It is fine if you object to the redirect. But you need to discuss exactly why you object to it when reverting. wound theology ◈ 11:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Political dissidence in the Empire of Japan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please engage in the discussion on the talk page. Peaceray (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kelvintjy reported by User:Peaceray (Result: ). Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear kelvin@Kelvintjy,

Will you please tell us now what’s going on ? Raoul mishima (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits to the Omamori page suggest an attempt to promote Soka Gakkai. 86.22.108.188 (talk) 04:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.wound theology ◈ 07:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

{{an3-notice}

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Soka Gakkai) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelvintjy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just revert what had been discussed by other editors. I will total stop editing Soka Gakkai page and let it be filled by those who are against Soka Gakkai Kelvintjy (talk) 08:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC) *Another incident that is happening with other editor is now involving Daisaku Ikeda article. Kelvintjy (talk) 08:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you have no intention of editing that article, there are no grounds to consider lifting your block on that article. Yamla (talk) 09:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelvintjy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not go to another edit war with the mentioned editor and I will not edit the controversy section. I am more interested in editing the cultural peroformance an education part. Yamla, I do not intent go go to edit war with the editor involved. Should I just create a new article realated to Soka Gakkai on cultural and education section if I remain blocked forever? Kelvintjy (talk) 05:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please propose your edits on the talk page while you work to get unblocked. I don't find your request convincing; it may help for you to tell us how you will approach a future content dispute. 331dot (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new comments below older comments. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]