User talk:Kavin Mudaliar

December 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sengunthar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Sengunthar. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 14:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking you for your encouragement. I will give correct citations Kavin Mudaliar (talk) 18:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chola military. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see, now i published unavoidable details only. Thank you. Kavin Mudaliar (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Antan O 04:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Chola military. Antan O 02:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Tondaimandalam. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Sun eye 1 (talk) 09:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Antan O 17:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mudaliar. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Luigi Boy ルアイヂボイ^talk 20:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Luigi Boy ルアイヂボイ^talk 20:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mudaliar

You have been editing the page Mudaliar for a very long time and some of your edits are concerning, you are removing sourced statement without having consensus on talk page. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as the recent edits of yours are not in the source. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions and explain why you did it in narrations.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis, you may be blocked from editing. (Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 13:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to South Asian social groups.
The specific details of these sanctions are described here:-

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

——SN 54129 14:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——SN 54129 14:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mudaliar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ——SN 54129 12:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mudaliar. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Luigi Boy ルアイヂボイ^talk 19:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Luigi Boy ルアイヂボイ^talk 21:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Mudaliar

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Xenani (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isai Velalar

Don't add Isai velalar link in Vellalar wiki page. They are not vellalar. Harishpranovhk (talk) 06:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sengunthar, you may be blocked from editing. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 06:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated edits and clash at Tuluva vellala page.

Hello Kavin Mudaliar, Greetings. Your recent edits and deletion of large content at Tuluva Vellala page is not commendable. It increases tensions between Tuluva Vellala and Sengunthar. Wikipedia is not a online platform for castle battles and keyboard warriors. I expect that you never repeat the same, again. I’m reverting the page to old original of feb, 2020. Thanks. 19:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Periyarist (talk • contribs)

Tiru vi ka and Mu va

Our Association label them as Tuluva vellalas. You have no right to claim the reference as false. This is Wikipedia, not our caste association hall. If you continue the same. I will legally complain about the IP address on intentionally making caste tensions. Behave yourself. Periyarist (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Action through- as per Wikipedia rules and Regulations and Tamil Nadu Caste tension prevention measures.

Hello. I’m the member of Thuluvar vellalar Mudaliar association, All India Mudaliar Sangam (AIMS) and International Pillaimar Mudaliar Association (IMPA) groups. I’ve been received information about vandalism and deletion up of Tuluva Vellala page on Wikipedia by you and your spoof ID. I, personally visited the edit history of the page and noticed notorious activities of degradation of a community, hereby developing a communal issue. I’ve informed the vandalism to other Mudaliar platforms i.e, Sengunthar association, Senguntha Mithran (as I received the info, That you may be a Sengunthar) and explained your comments on Tuluva vellala association and page. I’ve requested Wikipedia admins of India- English chapter to restrict your activities. We are also planned to initiate legal activities against the vandalism proposed on the liability of our page. The brief legal notice will be shortly available after finding out IP address and the Title upon Thuluva vellala mudaliar association Vs Kavin Mudaliar, legal limits of Bangalore urban district court. Kindly leave your contact address to send proper Legal notice, which is yet to be initiated.

Thanks. Dr Parthiv Ravichandiran (talk) 00:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Initiation of Legal procedures - Limits of Bangalore Urban District court.

Hello. I’m here to inform that Legal process on Thulava Vellalar Mudaliar Association Vs Kavin Mudaliar has been initiated. Further process will be updated via arsambandan@gmail.com. For any queries: contact the above mentioned gmail address.

Kindly leave your E-mail address or Contact via E mail mentioned above to make Legal procedures on ease.

Dr Parthiv Ravichandiran (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked User:Dr Parthiv Ravichandiran for making legal threats. He may not resume editing Wikipedia until either the threat is withdrawn or the legal process is concluded. EdJohnston (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kavin Mudaliar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock!

Dear Adminstrators, I need unblocking from editing, because I understand my errors which I never make in future. I want be in part of wiki for great information sharing to others... Kavin Mudaliar (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]