User talk:Luigi Boy
Welcome!
|
A kitten for you!
[edit]You are welcome dear.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thx la, really nice of you.
- Welcome again. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.SKAG123 (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY: we do not add future film projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see, thanks for notifying. Luigi Boy ルアイヂ ボイ talk 10:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Different Sree [1] [2]. DareshMohan (talk) 06:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm Charliehdb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Siren (2024 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 14:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Regarding Sri Lankan Vellalar article
[edit]Hey, Stop adding invalid sources and edits to the article. Read the sources first. For caste articles, reliable and NPOV sources must. Vellalar's myth origin =/= Pallar's pov.
From then added WP:RS source (The Sri Lankan Tamils Ethnicity and Identity, EDITED BY Chelvadurai Manogaran and Bryan Pf affenberge)
"From the Vellalar point of view, the stigma of Nalavar and Pallar rank, coupled with the history of these castes as recent immigrants from south India, denies that they have any real claim to membership in the Tamil community. In the early 1970s, some Vellalars expressly denied that Nalavars and Pallars were Tamils; and in tum, members of these two castes in the early 1970's still sometimes referred to Vellalars as "Tamils," thus driving home the social and cultural gulf that divided them from Vellalars. The Nalavars' and Pallars' recent historical origins in Dutch-sponsored immigrations from south India, and their putatively darl<er skin, also seive to deepen the Vellalar sense that the Minority Tamils are a people apart from the mainstream Tamil community. It should be noted that Minority Tamils do not always accept the view that they are non-Tamilians. The Pallars of Jaffna expressly conceive themselves to be descended from one of two Vellalar brothers; after the older brother's death, the widow--a "bad woman," according to the tale-made the younger one into a landless slave.25 In contrast to other low-ranking castes, which are (on the whole) remarl<ably quiescent, the Nalavars and Pallars have not hesitated to speak their minds about the injustice of their status. "
If pallars think they descended from Vellalar, that should be added to pallar's article. Not in Vellalar article. I hope you understand. If you make reverts, that is considered vandalism. Thank you, hope you have a good day. 152.58.246.69 (talk) 10:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there, I believe you might not fully understand how Wikipedia works in terms of maintaining neutrality and using reliable sources. The origin of a myth or perspective—whether it comes from a Vellalar or Pallar point of view—should be clearly identified as such in the article. Wikipedia's policies don't privilege one perspective over another, and both views can be presented as long as they are backed by reliable sources. In this case, the source provided is a reliable one under Wikipedia's WP
- guidelines.
- As long as we frame these claims clearly (e.g., "according to Vellalar mythology..." or "some Pallars believe..."), there is no violation of neutrality or reliability. Your suggestion that the Pallars' point of view should only appear in their article is not how Wikipedia functions—relevant information from all perspectives, when properly sourced, is welcome in articles that cover the broader subject.
- Regarding your claim about vandalism: reverting edits based on valid reasoning and consensus is part of improving the content, not vandalism. I suggest focusing on improving the neutrality and clarity of the article rather than threatening with vandalism accusations.
- Thank you, and I hope this helps clarify Wikipedia's content policies. Have a good day! Luigi Boy ルアイヂ ボイ talk 10:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Humbly saying, you're redherring by making false accusations and personal attacks. I simply asked you not to add misleading edits to the article and I asked you to read the sources. Without doing them, you reverted the edits and accused me of something I didn't do. None of the sources say "According to myth, pallars and vellalars were brothers". But you have added your unsourced edit to the article to imply your desired narrative. That's called Original research. Read WP:OR
- Wikipedia's content policies never say editors add cherrypicked content and twist the content to imply a desired narrative. Read WP:EP WP:SYNTH
- Many users use WP:NPOV to justify their misleading edits. That's wrong. The edits you reverted are similar to WP:FRINGE. It doesn't have any reliability. Better you remove the misleading edits or add edits that WP:RS sources say. The reason I removed the edits they aren't related to Vellalar's origin. The origin of Sri Lankan vellalar comes from Indian vellalars.
- If you're adamant that you want your narrative in the article, it won't last as it is misleading. You can ask a third opinion if you think I'm inferior to you because I'm editing from an Ip address. It's not about who edits, it's about the content value we bring. It is the motto of Wikipedia. 2409:40F4:200D:7C2B:BCDF:CF94:7E25:E27 (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Dispute resolution
[edit]I wanted you to notify about this [3]. I hope you're calm and ready to listen to others. Thanks. 2409:40F4:200D:7C2B:BCDF:CF94:7E25:E27 (talk) 17:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |