User talk:Karl304
Route boxes on station articles: contrast problem
[edit]Hi, this edit reminded me that we have a widespread problem across station articles: blue text on a blue background just isn't readable. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Route boxes on station articles: contrast problem; I have applied a suitable fix to just that one NI station article. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- That's a pretty clever solution. Only thing is that after just editing 50-something stations with text background route colours, I'm slightly less inclined to go back through and edit every single one of them again to use coloured stripes instead. However, I could do what I did with a darker blue-coloured line, and use spans to make the link text white instead of blue for this line as well. Still shows up against the blue, and seems readable enough to me. ~ Karl H. 22:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC) ~
- The problem with making the links white is that it goes against the second bullet of WP:CONTRAST - "Links should clearly be identifiable as a link to our readers". I don't mind altering 50-odd articles in the same way that I did Londonderry railway station - after all, last month I did that to all the stations in the Cardiff Valleys, and there's easily more than 50 of those. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I've now fixed up all the stations under Category:Railway stations in Scotland - there were well over 500 pages to do. Would you like me to amend the Northern Ireland ones in the same way? Will those in the Republic need doing too? --Redrose64 (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, if you like. I'll start editing some as well - may as well take a bit of work off your hands. The Republic doesn't have any route colours that I'm aware of, then again, I haven't seen any of their timetables as of late. Northern Ireland's timetables and maps have used distinct colours for their lines for about ten years now, Wikipedia's just never reflected that. Oh well, may as well just stations in the south be for now until I can get my hands on an Iarnród Éireann timetable, but feel free to get started on the north. ~ Karl H. 21:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC) ~
- P.S. In case the route colours change in future (which is entirely possible), I've created a bunch of templates you can use instead of the route colours on each individual station. That way, all the pages don't have to be individually changed if a colour changes to a slightly different shade of green.
- Not quite sure why I created them with the US English version of "colour", but oh well. ~ Karl H. 21:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC) ~
- Great - I've put them into Category:Templates for UK railway line colours. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I've now fixed up all the stations under Category:Railway stations in Scotland - there were well over 500 pages to do. Would you like me to amend the Northern Ireland ones in the same way? Will those in the Republic need doing too? --Redrose64 (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- The problem with making the links white is that it goes against the second bullet of WP:CONTRAST - "Links should clearly be identifiable as a link to our readers". I don't mind altering 50-odd articles in the same way that I did Londonderry railway station - after all, last month I did that to all the stations in the Cardiff Valleys, and there's easily more than 50 of those. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queen's Quay railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terminus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Honorifics in lists of politicians
[edit]Hi Karl304. Since you've edited one or more of List of current members of the British Privy Council, British Government frontbench and Official Opposition frontbench in the last six months, I'd like to invite you to a discussion about the use of honorifics in those lists. The discussion is happening here, and I look forward to a helpful and robust discussion. DBD 20:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edinburgh West. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Karl304. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IERail insert
[edit]
Template:IERail insert has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
RE: Template NI Exec
[edit]Hi. As far as I'm aware, the Executive is now no longer functioning and no ministers exist. I took this from the BBC. MLAs will continue to sit in the Assembly until the 26th, but the Executive is no longer. Unless you could clarify? st170e 18:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello! You could be right. My interpretation was that since the Economy Minister's debate on RHI costs has been postponed till next week, that he must still technically be a minister for that debate to happen or be of any use, even if only in a caretaker capacity (obviously nothing useful can happen without a FM/dFM). I could be entirely wrong on that, admittedly. ~ Karl 20:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC) ~
- You could be right also: it's a really grey area. The Executive has collapsed but other reports say that ministers are in place until the election. If you manage to find any other sources, let me know! st170e 04:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- BBC News is reporting there's minister's question time today in the Assembly with the Justice Minister and Infrastructure Minister (Link, under "Summary"). I guess that means they're still ministers? You're right though - it's a woefully grey area. ~ Karl 13:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC) ~
- You could be right also: it's a really grey area. The Executive has collapsed but other reports say that ministers are in place until the election. If you manage to find any other sources, let me know! st170e 04:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I noticed you program in JavaScript...
[edit]The JavaScript WikiProject is now up and running. We organize and develop JavaScript articles, navigation aids, and user scripts.
The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library.
If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.
Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 15:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Karl304. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:NIRDublinLineColor
[edit]Template:NIRDublinLineColor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Karl304. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Scottish council elections, 2017
[edit]Template:Scottish council elections, 2017 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:UTAColor
[edit]Template:UTAColor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
FOI for Northern Ireland Railways
[edit]Hi Karl304, Do you know if there are any FOI station figures from before 2022? If not do you think we should request some. RooneyDonal21 16:13, 15 June 2024 (IST)
- Hi RooneyDonal21. I've just had a deeper look around the WhatDoTheyKnow website. It seems a diligent user has been requesting yearly station figures since the 2015/16 financial year, all of which look like they've been duly provided by NIR - so there are actually a lot more figures out there in the public domain than I'd thought! [1] :Karl 18:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Rail line four routes
[edit]Template:Rail line four routes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)