User talk:KarenMenuhin

KarenMenuhin (talk) 13:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Karen Menuhin[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krov Menuhin (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krov Menuhin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! KarenMenuhin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krov Menuhin

Hello KarenMenuhin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Krov Menuhin for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jhona43 (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, KarenMenuhin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi Karen - just a note that my original answer was written regarding your article being deleted, but I've modified it to discuss your draft instead. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, KarenMenuhin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 16:27, 14 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, KarenMenuhin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 17:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krov Menuhin (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krov Menuhin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! KarenMenuhin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, KarenMenuhin. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Krov Menuhin, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Krov Menuhin and citation templates

Hello, i got your email. In future it is just as easy to put a message on my talk page. I will be sent an automatic email telling me that this has happened, and if I am logged onto Wikipedia will see a notification. However this worked, so there is no problem.

You seem to have a misunderstanding about how to use the citation templates such as {tl|cite journal}} {{cite news}}, {{cite web}} and the rest. The first= and last= parameters are for the names of the person who wrote the source being cited. For a newspaper, the person named in the byline, if any. For a book the author. For a web site, if there is a "by" credit, that person. If two or more people are jointly credited (as is often the case with books, sometimes with other publications) use first1= and last1= for the first author, first2= and last2= for the 2nd author, and so on. If there is no namked author 9aas there often isn't for web sites and small newspaper stories) just omit first= and last= completely.

If a newspaper or other publication comes from a specific location, you can use the location= parameter to specify this, don't add it to the title of the publication or the publisher with a dash. However, if it is implied by the name of the work, leave it off. If the location is obvious from the name of the paper, don't use location=. For example, if the paper is The New York Times "location=New York City is redundant. if there is an article about the location you can link it such as <nowiki>location=Brisbane</nowiki> Similarly you can link the name of the work, if appropriate. Such links are never required.

More to come. DES ^(talk) 21:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC) Hi DES, much, much thanks I will go back over the titles and correct them. Plus I will use this page in future. KarenMenuhin (talk) 10:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC) I have edited the citations and hope to have correcty followed your guidelines. In a number of journals there are no authors given, which is a shame, but I cannot attribute them. Quite a lot of the citations cover more than one area of the article, but I believe I should not duplicate the citations. Do I need to find other sources? Thanks for you time! It is no easy task.KarenMenuhin (talk) 12:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is perfectly acceptable to use the same citation for more than one statemnet, if the source includes multiple relevant facts. The way to do this is using "named footnotes" as described in Help:Footnotes#Footnotes:_using_a_source_more_than_once. The first time (or any one time, actually, but the fist is simpler) a sources is cited, you include the full citation data but give the source a name, like this: <ref name=Jones2010>{{cite book|last=Jones |first=John |title=Big Book of Useful Facts |year=2010 |page=276}}</ref>. Then for any other cites to the same source you simply insert <ref name=Jones2010 />. (Note the closing slash.) The source will be listed in the reflist only once, with two (or more) small letters indicating the various places it is used. This is a preferred technique. See the help page linked above for more detail. Additional sources would not hurt, if available, but that is more to demonstrate notability or to fill in other aspects of the article not covered in the sources already cited, if any. Controversial or extraordinary statements should often be cited to multiple sources, but routine facts which no one is likely to dispute need not be. DES ^(talk) 21:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DES. I have tried to correct these items mentioned and use as many unique citations as possible. I have resubmitted the article. Do you think I need to do more? I hate to keep asking you for more help, you must busy enough. Much thanks for the huge effort you have given. KarenMenuhin (talk) 21:58, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krov Menuhin (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krov Menuhin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! KarenMenuhin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KarenMenuhin was:

Comment: Not notable and probably never will be. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)KarenMenuhin (talk) 16:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:KarenMenuhin

September 2015

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Krov Menuhin while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC) thanks, I forget that it logs me out. I was just quietly working away and didn't realise. I have logged in now, do I have to redo all the edits?KarenMenuhin (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Krov Menuhin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Krov Menuhin. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 02:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krov Menuhin (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krov Menuhin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krov Menuhin (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Remove the minor material, or it is not likely to ever be accepted

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krov Menuhin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok, will do thanks!KarenMenuhin (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krov Menuhin (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

Please copyedit and cleanup the article. Also it is to be believed that you are in close connection with subject,causing possible conflict of Interest issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krov Menuhin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Krov Menuhin

Hello, KarenMenuhin. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Krov Menuhin".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:KarenMenuhin/sandbox/Krov Menuhin

Hello, KarenMenuhin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Krov Menuhin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]