User talk:Kapil Khatik

April 2020

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Praxidicae (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed information in Wikipedia, and placed the website link in External links for those who want to know more, what's spam in that ? Kapil Khatik (talk) 13:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No you spammed a hijacked website hosting copyrighted content illegally. Do it again and you will be blocked and the site blacklisted. Praxidicae (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not placed linked of any hijacked website, that's my own website in which there's well researched and detailed content about the movie topic, and that's the news I have not provided the download link on it sir Kapil Khatik (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly, that's bullshit. The website was hijacked recently and it used to be own by the singer of the same name. You're adding nothing but garbage. Praxidicae (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was a expired domain which I bought from auction, and created a website on it, is there anything wrong in that sir ?

Kapil Khatik (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's a lot wrong with it when you present it as if it's a legitimate website instead of a repository for spammy, pirated crap. Praxidicae (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's movie news which has been leaked, All news high rated websites IndianExpres, News India all of them post this content, are those websites grabage ? Kapil Khatik (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kapil Khatik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why I have been blocked? I have placed details and given my link in External link for more info to read for those woh are interested, what's wrong in that sir ? Kapil Khatik (talk) 16:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.