User talk:KINOGLAS

Speedy deletion nomination of Grand river film

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Grand river film requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poor men`s justice

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Poor men`s justice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Poor men`s justice and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Poor men`s justice. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Grand river film. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Poor men`s justice. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ilyushka88 talk 20:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the above warnings you have at least twice more removed speedy deletion tags, from both Grand river film and Poor men`s justice. You may well be blocked from editing now; if you are not blocked immediately you will blocked if you continue your disruptive editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Leonid Berdichevsky, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the above warnings you have continued to remove speedy deletion tags from the articles you have created. You will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Leonid Berdichevsky, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours due to persistently disruptive editing. You may resume editing after the block expires, but continued disruption may result in longer blocks without further warning. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 21:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poor men`s justice

A tag has been placed on Poor men`s justice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DJBullfish 21:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you KINOGLAS 1?

Are you the same person as KINOGLAS 1? If so why do you have two accounts? JamesBWatson (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]