Jump to content

User talk:K.e.coffman/Archive/2020/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK for The Myth of the Eastern Front

[edit]

On 18 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Myth of the Eastern Front, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Myth of the Eastern Front explores the parallels between the myth of the clean Wehrmacht and the Lost Cause of the Confederacy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Myth of the Eastern Front. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Myth of the Eastern Front), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]
K.e.coffman,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! —DIYeditor (talk) 08:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
@DIYeditor: thank you; I appreciate it. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

[edit]

Hope your Holidays have been pleasant. Thank you for all your ongoing contributions. Wünsche ich Dir einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr!--Obenritter (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Obenritter: Thank you; it's always good to see you on my Talk page or in edit histories. Same to you. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Myth of the Eastern Front

[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Myth of the Eastern Front has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the article's GAN.

Happy New Year,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist: Thank you for your efforts, as always. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 12:45:08, 9 January 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Til1004

[edit]


Hey,

i need some help with the article of empower. The article already has been reviewed an the reviewer said that the sources are not valid. It would be super kind if some could tell me what sources are needet to get the article published.

Kind regards, Til --Til1004 (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Til1004 (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Til1004, what you need is multiple reliable sources which are independent of the subject and have in-depth coverage of it, per WP:NCORP. buidhe 12:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Expanse Inc

[edit]

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to review my Wikipedia article on Expanse Inc. I understand it was rejected on November 1, 2019, due to the lack of notability. Since then I have revised the draft to remove any promotional language, highlight notability, and made the article as neutral as possible. Would you consider re-reviewing and/or providing more context in terms of what you are looking for? What is needed from my side, specifically, to resubmit?

For more context, Expanse is a technology company that discovers and manages global Internet assets for Fortune 500 companies and large government organizations, including the U.S. Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Lockheed Martin, Allergan, CVS Health, PayPal, and many more. Our customers make up over 10% of the routable Internet. Our investors include Arianna Huffington, Peter Thiel, Egon Durban, Taylor Glover, Sam Palmisano, NEA, IVP, founders Fund, and MSD Capital. We were recently featured as Strong Performer by Forrester in The Forrester Wave™: Vulnerability Risk Management, Q4 2019.

From the above, it seems Expanse should have sufficient notability to warrant its own page. Based on your experience, I would appreciate your assistance on how to further improve this article in order for it to be published. Mahnoortarique (talk) 00:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahnoortarique: Please see: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Paid editing. The subject of the draft also fails WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:PROMO. The company is just not notable. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Myth of the Eastern Front

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Myth of the Eastern Front you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 13:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ...

[edit]
January
... with thanks from QAI

... for improving articles in January! Today - 20 in 2020 - is a birthday, she is pictured on the lower choir pic, enjoy listening. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Myth of the Eastern Front

[edit]

The article The Myth of the Eastern Front you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Myth of the Eastern Front for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert per request I give you one at Talk:Race and intelligence

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Can I suggest you use DSAWARE to add any others you think are needed? Doug Weller talk 10:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I don't mind being alerted. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lviv pogroms (1941)

[edit]

On 27 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lviv pogroms (1941), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that photographs of the 1941 Lviv pogroms have been described by historians as "infamous", "horrific", and "almost iconic"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lviv pogroms (1941). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lviv pogroms (1941)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Abel Azcona

[edit]

K.e.coffman, you had serious concerns about this nomination. There has been some work and a response to your latest comment. Do you think you could return and evaluate what's been done, to determine whether the article (and nomination) are making good progress, or if the problems are still significant? Thanks for whatever you're able to do. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BlueMoonset: It's been a challenging nomination to review -- would you perhaps be able to provide a second opinion? --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
K.e.coffman, I wouldn't, but we could certainly call for one if you think it's best. I see you've since been pinged from the nomination to give a new opinion after the recent work. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Southeast Team Handball Conference

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Southeast Team Handball Conference. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Malo95 (talk) 10:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

[edit]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:K.e.coffman/Archive/2020/February&oldid=1145987958"