User talk:Jy Sandford
|
|
COI
[edit]Hi Jy, You really shouldn't be editing Candidates of the next Australian federal election, considering you yourself are featured on it. There was nothing wrong with your edit, but I would really steer clear of editing the page, especially the row that contains yourself. GraziePrego (talk) 04:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GraziePrego, there's a similar discussion at User talk:Jy Sandford/August Archive#Conflict of Interest. TarnishedPathtalk 05:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath There is indeed, however I am starting a new thread as Jy is ignoring that previous warning to not edit articles which involve them. Specifically this edit from today where they edit the candidates for Jagajaga at the next federal election- the Greens candidate for Jagajaga is Jy Sandford, so they're extremely involved with the content they're editing. GraziePrego (talk) 06:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- No worries. I thought I'd make you aware that they'd previously been advised that they should stay away from editing about themselves. That they're continuing to do it suggests WP:IDHT. TarnishedPathtalk 06:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath There is indeed, however I am starting a new thread as Jy is ignoring that previous warning to not edit articles which involve them. Specifically this edit from today where they edit the candidates for Jagajaga at the next federal election- the Greens candidate for Jagajaga is Jy Sandford, so they're extremely involved with the content they're editing. GraziePrego (talk) 06:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Would also like to add that he seems to be extensively editing Division of Jagajaga, his division of candidacy. That is probably not relevant in this thread but could further violate wikipedia rules. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 09:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't read the specific guidelines because I've never had cause to, but I don't see a issue with editing Division of Jagajaga as long as they're not editing about themselves. TarnishedPathtalk 09:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah as far as I can tell they aren't really editing about themselves of DoJJ so much as the opinion polling etc. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 10:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't read the specific guidelines because I've never had cause to, but I don't see a issue with editing Division of Jagajaga as long as they're not editing about themselves. TarnishedPathtalk 09:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)