User talk:DeadlyRampage26
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Your GA nomination of Surface Fleet Review
[edit]The article Surface Fleet Review you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Surface Fleet Review for comments about the article, and Talk:Surface Fleet Review/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
TarnishedPathtalk 09:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- What's this regarding man? DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 09:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- The last page remotely close to that that I edited was Governorates of Palestine over a week ago DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 09:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- CTOP rules are broadly construed and include material about the conflict that is in articles that aren't primarily concerned with the conflict. TarnishedPathtalk 09:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Great. And I have acted according to guidelines... DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 09:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you do this to everyone or just me? I swear these notices from you are worthy of an archive on their own haha DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 09:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I'm not singling you out. You just happen to edit a few articles that I have on my watchlist and you're still relatively new to WP so I try and give guidance where I think it will avert issues later.
- On another topic, check out https://web.archive.org/web/20241122221046/https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/a-scrapped-preselection-and-resignations-greens-in-severe-turmoil-in-melbourne-s-north-east-20241121-p5kses.html about old mate. TarnishedPathtalk 10:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Holy shit. No wonder he was so enthusiastic. He must be fuming... DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 10:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- CTOP rules are broadly construed and include material about the conflict that is in articles that aren't primarily concerned with the conflict. TarnishedPathtalk 09:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- The last page remotely close to that that I edited was Governorates of Palestine over a week ago DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 09:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)