Jump to content

User talk:JustARandomEditor123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deceit 2 (July 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, JustARandomEditor123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deceit 2 (August 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi JustARandomEditor123! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi JustARandomEditor123, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please do not create any further articles generated by AI methods on Cebuano Wikipedia and then machine translated to English. Take a look at the article history and you will see that the article has had to be re-written by three other editors to correct all the mistakes that you introduced. At the very least, read the article for grammar and check that the basic facts are correct.

In your original article creation you stated that:

  • Litophyton columnaris was a genus of moss - It is actually a species of soft coral!
  • The article referred to Litophyton columnaris in the text and taxobox, but was included on a page titled Nephthea columnaris - basic accuracy and consistency counts!
  • "There is no other listed species such as this" - What does that even mean?

While all good faith contributions are welcomed, please slow down and check what you are submitting before hitting 'save'. If you have any questions regarding editing, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 03:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing content scales on pages

[edit]

Hi. I hope this isn’t too much of a tall order, but I was wondering if you could change some content assessment scales on pages that have been significantly improved in recent times. If you find the time, you can read most of the pages I’m referring to that are listed in the upper half of my user page. Some of those pages I think are graded just fine the way they are for now, but most others now have outdated scales. Another user also tried his hardest to improve the New York Central 3001 page. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have gone through the list of articles in your talk page and have re-evaluated them to assign them a more appropriate grade. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated! Thank you so much. I didn’t realize some of the pages I created that you reassessed deserved that high of a grade, particularly those Canadian Ten-Wheeler ones. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 04:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]