User talk:JurisDigital

This is JurisDigital's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: GOBER ET AL. V. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY sexual harassment case (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://casetext.com/case/gober-v-ralphs-grocery-co-1. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:GOBER ET AL. V. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY sexual harassment case may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 06:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JurisDigital! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 06:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs) (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

There are formal repositories for legal cases and precedents. Wikipedia is not one. This feels more like a well considered attack page than an article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello JurisDigital. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JurisDigital. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JurisDigital|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
I note that you edit in matters of law, and that https://jurisdigital.com is a legal marketing agency. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs)

Hello, JurisDigital. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma (Peggy) Noland, Suzanne Papiro and Tina Swann Against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs)

Hello, JurisDigital. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Case of Plaintiffs Dianne Gober, Terrill L. Finton, Sarah Lang, Talma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]