User talk:Junior 588

WELCOME TO MY PAGE

| name = junior | gender=Male | birthplace= Botswana

Caption

Name

This user's name is junior.

This user is proud to be an Motswanai.

Hello, and welcome to my user page. I'm junior

Junior 588, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Junior 588! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Junior 588. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 10:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Junior 588! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 10:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

(Acyclonxe talk contribs 10:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)) I will contact you as soon as possible ✌ (junior 588 talk contribs 10:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)) been trying to upload some images that are not mine but its refusing[reply]

Your signature

Hello. Your signature style is identical to User:Acyclonxe's and even links to their talk page. WP:SIGFORGE says

Never use another editor's signature. Impersonating another editor by using his or her username or signature is forbidden. Altering the markup code of your signature to make it look substantially like another user's signature may also be considered a form of impersonation. Editing the code of your signature to link it to another editor's user page is not permitted.

Please change your signature to meet this guideline. If you do not know how to do so, click here to reset your signature to default. Thanks. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 10:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(junior 588 talk contribs 10:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)) I did change it[reply]

Eh, I didn’t do the edit up there. I did not say “I will contact you as possible”. Acyclonxe ^{Let’s discuss it, please.} 11:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plus AE I haven’t change my signature. Acyclonxe ^{Let’s discuss it, please.} 11:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Acyclonxe: This is Junior 588's talk page. I am asking him. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abelmoschus Esculentus: But it somehow notified me. Acyclonxe ^{Let’s discuss it, please.} 11:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and that's exactly why I need to notify you. Junior 588's signature is problematic (links to your user page), which is forbidden per policy ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Junior 588, you did not change your signature and remove the link to Acyclonxe's talk page. I told you if you are not familiar with HTML markup, you should consult others or click here to reset your signature to default. If you refuse to do so, I may open a thread regarding this matter in WP:ANI. This will attract more users to help you with this. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(junior 588 talk contribs 11:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)) I hope its ok now[reply]

Yes it is fixed now. Happy editing! ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(junior 588 talk contribs 11:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)) Thank you sir/madam 😜😜[reply]

January 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC) (junior 588 talk contribs 14:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)) I always do 😁😥[reply]

You need to sign your post AFTER the comment not before. Theroadislong (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure like this?(junior 588 talk contribs 14:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to LGBT— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 08:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Category:LGBT people. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Serols, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 08:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the block is no longer needed because i understand what i was blocked for, i will not do it again and i will make good changes instead(junior 588 talk contribs 10:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junior 588 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer needed because i understand what i was blocked for, i will not do it again and i will make good changes insteadjunior 588 talk contribs 10:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to be more specific and explain about all of those points; it is not enough to just say that you understand. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junior 588 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because i understand what i have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions insteadjunior 588 talk contribs 11:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you not read what I said above? You need to be more specific and explain what it is you did wrong, how you won't do it again, and what constructive contributions you want to make. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junior 588 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i understand what i hve been blocked for and what i did was wrong because i asked questions that cannot help wikipedia to grow and become a better place i now understand that wikipedia is not a place where such questions can be asked such questions like is there a homosexual person here(this is jus an example).I promise i wont do it again n i will do this by re-moulding my character and also my conduct i want wikipedia to be a better place.I will add more articles and also i will edit some articles by adding new information where possible and also i will add more pictures to certain articles that do not have pictures.I will not make any disruption to wikipedia but rather i will improve wikipedia by doing the abovejunior 588 talk contribs 08:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.