User talk:JuniorJenny

November 2018

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Nisar Nasik— has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thank you. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Representative Concentration Pathway. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mangazuki (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://bornrealist.com/read-manga/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Mangazuki may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JuniorJenny! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mangazuki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mangazuki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://bornrealist.com/read-manga. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 16:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

your edit to Wolf Girl and Black Prince.

Thought this edit is old, don't add a web-site or a link to a scanlation. Only the main publisher/ distributor to the book can be listed there. Leave the url/ link alone at here;

[http://betsuma.shueisha.co.jp/lineup/ookamisyoujo.html Ookami Shoujo to Kuro Ouji] at [[Shueisha]] {{ja icon}}

But not this;

[https://www.mangazuki.online/manga/wolf-girl-and-black-prince/ Ookami Shoujo to Kuro Ouji] at [[Shueisha]] {{ja icon}}

That web-site is a scanlation. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 21:45, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Putlocker. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 18:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Manga. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 14:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ mazca ^talk 16:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]