User talk:Judo112

Hello, Judo112, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.

User:Judo112/Archive1/Judo112/

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Swanberg (2nd nomination)

This is up for AfD again (you chimed in first time yesterday, but nom was closed) in case you wish to comment again . --Milowent (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, done!Judo112 (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Reade

Actually an article doesn't have to go to AFD to be merged. You can add a {{merge}} template. I did actually do this, but then read through the article and came to the conclusion she wasn't really notable enough in her own right. Even though she's posed for Playboy I still don't think she's really that notable. I won't revert your changes, however, but will open a discussion on the talk page. You're welcome to add your thoughts there. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

I have mentioned you at WP:ANI#Banned user Zingostar. – Steel 21:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, didn't know about this. Was acting in good faith. Fact remains that the person isn't really notable so I'll just undo the reversions I think. TheRetroGuy (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok!Judo112 (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User warnings

I'm confused. Why have you just issued this user warning? TheRetroGuy (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right i should have pointed out which edit.. Angie Bolen.--Judo112 (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that edit goes under this assumption --Judo112 (talk) 16:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does help to add the name of the article on which the vandalism has taken place. For example warning the user about vandalism to Angie Bolen would be done like this {{subst:uw-vand1|Angie Bolen}}. Also it's pointless warning IPs for old edits. They often change sporadically so their edits can be stale. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 10:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Jassy

The version of David Jassy's article which I created was carefully sourced, referenced, and taken directly from news articles, unlike the "consensus" version you keep reverting to, which is heavily slanted toward Mr. Jassy.

Well first of all where are the sources then?.. And you need to sign your messages.Cheers--Judo112 (talk) 21:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judo112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont know why really i was blocked but the reason seems very weak and unnecessary until the current discussion is closed. Havent done any bad faith edits whatsoever and i believe the block should be removed on this assumption. I have also never recieved a warning for my edits which should be considered.

Decline reason:

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
Try to edit the Sandbox.
If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Mango juice^talk 21:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judo112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked indefinite by the same person who reported me. He hasnt given anyone else a chance to give put in on the discussion concerning this sockpuppet buisness. I wasnt blocke don my IP-adress but on my account as you can see i did edits last night from my IP on Serbias entry for Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2009 Ništa lično which isnt the same IP as he has blocked obviously. This is a case of mistaken identity from a former administrator.

Decline reason:

I don't feel I can unblock you since less than two weeks ago you were socking with Xcalibur38 (talk · contribs) after your express promise not to do so previously. I just Confirmed that using checkuser. Zingostar is several years stale, but given Steel's comments, which are supported by my technical findings, I'm inclined to agree with him. I'm also noticing some editing similarities between you and Zingostar. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 14:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Mesac Damas

The article Mesac Damas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 11:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - September and October 2009

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Wilder

Judo, I've quick failed this article. My reasons are explained on the article's talk page. --Christine (talk) 13:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Judo112! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Brolle - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - November and December 2009

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by xenobot 14:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nicklas Söderblom

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nicklas Söderblom. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicklas Söderblom. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Disappearance of Jennifer Marteliz

The article Disappearance of Jennifer Marteliz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fail to see what make this case any more notable than the hundreds of very similar cases

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astronaut (talk) 03:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - January and February 2010

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by xenobot 14:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Beau Maestas

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Beau Maestas, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=6603485&page=2, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Beau Maestas and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Beau Maestas, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Beau Maestas with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Beau Maestas. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Beau Maestas saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! KimChee (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death of Sahar Daftary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Sahar Daftary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Sahar Daftary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia–Azerbaijan relations in the Eurovision Song Contest nominated for DYK!

Armenia–Azerbaijan relations in the Eurovision Song Contest, an article you created or expanded, was recently nominated to be on the Did you know? section of the Main Page! This section is where facts from recently created or expanded articles are shown. If it passes review, it will be shown prominently on one of the most viewed webpages on the Internet! If you have thoughts, questions or concerns, you can join the discussion here. Cheers! (The previous message was left by an automated bot. Did I make an error? Report it to my owner!)

—Cerabot (talk) 12:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ingibjörg Egilsdóttir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ingibjörg Egilsdóttir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingibjörg Egilsdóttir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]