User talk:JuTa

Welcome!

Hello, JuTa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - GilliamJF 10:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warm welcome. I am working here mainly only to set interwikis; mainly I work in German Wikipedia. --Jutta234 10:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Jutta234! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 04:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlaestinaIglesia.jpg

Hey JuTa, I would recommend you don't delete this image. Like a week ago Wikimedia Foundation sent us an e-mail to thank all who donated to wiki, in that e-mail comes attached a video in which Jimmy Wales makes an appearance himself, talking proudly about how knowledge or/and Wikipedia can reach the most remotes places in the world, like Palestina, a small village in the jungle of Peru, and how easy is to create an article in Wikipedia. In the video you could see kids from Palestina in a classroom surfing the internet with their little laptops and finding out there was no information about their village and decided to create an article about it in Wikipedia, guided by their tutor, Michael Kleiman. That was awesome! to see those little kids editing themselves and feeling proud and amazed when doing so. One of the kids says "that's the picture we took" referring to the picture you intend to delete. I know you are helping in keeping Wikipedia in good terms, and your help is much appreciated, but I don't think these kids know much about the rules and ways nor Michael Kleiman. I think Kleiman registered to make this article only, so it will probably be hard to contact him to help providing more information about this image, which is required, I know. So I am asking you to wait so we can fix this issue. I think if you watch the video you will get some of your questions answered. Name of the video in YouTube: Children of Peru write their own history in Wikipedia Thanks. --Cefaro (talk) 04:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

— JuTa, i saw that you revered the updated image of the Autodesk logohttp://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Autodesk_logo.svg from the rebrand, but didn't leave any comment as to why you did it or any notes on the talk page let me know what your reasoning for the reversion was please. Jared Zimmerman (talk) 21:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Africa Magic Viewers' Choice Awards on Commons

Greetings JuTa. You recently tagged all of the pictures I uploaded onto Commons. I just forwarded the email I received from the copyright owner to OTRS. Please check it as soon as you can and get back to me thanks. You're a volunteer at OTRS, correct? Versace1608 (Talk) 19:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JuTa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JuTa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 116.240.233.174. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Roy Wang have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.

Silver Star medal award ribbon

re: File:Silver Star ribbon.svg - This image is being used on numerous (100+) articles on Wikipedia, including BLP's. You deleted it? (edit summary: Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:SilverStar.svg) However, there is now no image on all these pages. Please fix this as soon as possible. Thank you Thewolfchild (talk) 01:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CommonsDelinker has been automaticly ordered to fix the articels - see here. Normaly it does it within a few minutes. Lets wait a bit further. regards. --JuTa (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reorderd it now - see here. --JuTa (talk) 01:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Wonderful Life

Hi JuTa - You recently reverted an image on the Frank Capra film It's a Wonderful Life, with James Stewart and Gloria Grahame.

Allow me to explain: The image was nominated for removal because the public domain disclaimer became corrupted, with repeated phrases - I don't know how. I copied and pasted the corrupted version into a number of subsequent images until I was altered to the problem. That is the basis for the nomination.

I tried to re-upload the image with a proper disclaimer. You removed it and re-posted the old nominated image.

I'd like to establish these images as legitimate for use on Wikipedia articles. That was my purpose in substituting the image. --CerroFerro (talk) 18:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was a duplicate on commons. I kept the older file and redirected the younger. --JuTa (talk) 18:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't the image that was nominated per se. Why is it still nominated for deletion? --CerroFerro (talk) 19:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is the same photo, why it shouldnt? --JuTa (talk) 21:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is in the public domain. That is not disputed. The reason it was removed was because the public domain disclaimer read like this, with the phrase "because this file" was repeated again and again, as follows:

because This file is in the public domain, because This file is in the public domain, because This file is in the public domain, because This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1963 and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY

I tried to fix the disclaimer when I reposted it. Do you understand now? --CerroFerro (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, because that was excactly the same with your upload commons:File:It's a Wonderful Life (film) 1946. Frank Capra director Donna Reed Liberty Films-RKO.jpg. So: The same image with the same license and the same problems. I kept the older version with a running deletion request, because the younger version had the same problems. --JuTa (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I think you should better use commons:Template:PD-US-no notice for your uploads if you are sure its valid, the current commons:Template:PD-because is using more or less very similar text and reasoning.

CerroFerro: And you should *not* reupload the files with the same description as before to bypass the deletion request. --JuTa (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to bypass it. Just want to get it right. If I upload the image again, using commons:Template:PD-US-no notice, will that be satisfactory? --CerroFerro (talk) 18:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, please just correct the license template on the current existing images and leave a note about that on the deletion request page commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CerroFerro. The deciding admin will take that into account of his decsion. regards. --JuTa (talk) 18:40, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. And thank you for your patience. --CerroFerro (talk) 20:06, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Missing Evidence of Permission" question

Dear JuTa - Would you take a moment and provide your judgment on the removal of the following image from Wiki Commons:

Does this seem justified? Why is this, and another three images removed when my disclaimer was presented correctly? CerroFerro (talk) 19:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for the 1st one the source link is broken. 2nd you should use Commons:Template:PD-US-no notice and not Commons:Template:PD-because with the text of it. As far as I know here are methods to find such copyright notes, but I dont know which or where to search. Did you search for such notices, or did you just asumed it because of the age of the images/movies? The images were marked by Patrick Rogel, you should ask him here for his reasons. --JuTa (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know why the infobox image for Robert Aldrich was deleted? CerroFerro (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See here. --JuTa (talk) 22:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JuTa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]