User talk:Jstrob

Welcome!

Hello, Jstrob, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Neuville Airport has been reverted.
Your edit here to Neuville Airport was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Contre-laeroport-de-Neuville/164004140357392, http://www.facebook.com/pages/Contre-laeroport-de-Neuville/164004140357392, http://www.facebook.com/pages/Neuville-Sans-AÃ©roport/141489105949780, http://www.facebook.com/pages/Aeroport-de-Neuville-Menace-au-Plomb/248255298594562, http://www.facebook.com/pages/AÃ©roport-de-Neuville-No-Mans-Land/397910513568581, http://www.facebook.com/pages/AÃ©roport-de-Neuville-AntidÃ©mocratique/344191528953225?ref=ts) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jstrob! Thank you for your contributions. I am TowTrucker and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! TowTrucker (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TowTrucker

Hi! I read the question you posted on my talk page. I am sure you are talking about this article: Neuville Airport. I myself am very new to Wikipedia so I like helping out other new people like me :). I think the reversal you did was OK. However, I don't think the amount the vandalism is high enough to warrant page protection. Of course you can always request page protection if you want to. I have edited the page further to try make sure it has WP:NPV. Thanks! --TowTrucker (talk) 22:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Jstrob (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From what I understand you seem to be involved with this airport thing and are against it. This can lead to conflict of interest. So please try to remain neutral while editing the article. Also, please avoid peacock terms. I have edited the article to try and make it more neutral. We have to make sure that the article represents all sides of the issue equally. Your reversal of the edits by Love2soar seems appropriate. It seems that all he has done with that account is blanked sections of the article. Please revert my edits if you wish to. Thanks :) --TowTrucker talk 22:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I think I will at leas leave the blog as an external link cause this blog is the most extensive source of information about this airport.

I finnally was granted with page protection for 3 days. And About the mention "one of the most beautiful village" this is a fact beacause Neuville is part of the official list of the most beautiful village of Quebec: see that website: http://www.beauxvillages.qc.ca/villages_eng_neuville/neuville_eng.htm

As you might have seen I do not know much about this topic. I agree with your edits as long as they remain neutral. However, I believe we cannot use a blog as a reliable source. It seems to be good enough for an External Link though. I'm not so sure about the FB page link. Thanks for your contributions :) --TowTrucker talk 22:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Québec/Neuville Airport

I've cleaned up and merged in the material you added. I have also left a detailed explanation at Talk:Québec/Neuville Airport. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, Jstrob. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Xx network, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 04:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chaotic Enby. I am not related to this project, I'm just a random fan of Mr. David Chaum and his various projects like xx network. I don't know him personally and never met him. Jstrob (talk) 04:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Logo xx-network color.png

Thanks for uploading File:Logo xx-network color.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Xx network moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Xx network. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk? | contribs) 08:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Miminity, thank you. I will add more independent sources and I tried to make the article neutral but seemed like I failed. sorry about that. I will try to reword it to be perfectly neutral, I guess without any author's intention and purely descriptive. I looked at many other crypto currency articles on wikipedia and tried to make a similar article. I will try again. Thanks for your feedback. Jstrob (talk) 13:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One question about primary sources: should I just add more independent sources or do I have to remove the primary sources completely? Jstrob (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One rule of thumb for me at least is 75% of the sources provided are at least be a secondary source. You can remove of the primary sources if you find a secondary alternative. Honestly, if it's up to you. If you need more question you can ask help on Wikipedia:Teahouse Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you! I will aim for the 75%. Have a nice day. Jstrob (talk) 14:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted the draft for review. I added many more independent sources and removed some primary ones. I also rewrote everything to avoid author's intention and avoid looking promotional. I hope it's a bit better now. Jstrob (talk) 15:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xx network (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

Additionally this is WP:BOMBARD. Just, please, do not do that. t smacks of advertising

Please sort out your referencing so that a correct review can be made

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xx network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jstrob! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]