User talk:Jonathan Mcrey

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Hello, Jonathan Mcrey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Quick introduction to Wikipedia
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLOS Computational Biology
Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)
A few tricks to help you format references are at WP:MEDHOW

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, try Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then type {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page.

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to visit the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

We at Wikipedia love evidence based medicine. You must therefore cited the best available evidence aswell as write in a consistent format. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COI ?

It appears that all of your edits are citing one source (Robert Mendoza), generally on article where those sources aren't needed or helpful. Please have a look at the information above from Doc James, as well as WP:COI. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, please inform us about a COI, and whether in future you plan to adhere to WP:MEDRS. Thanks. JFW | T@lk 21:15, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What COI? I am simply citing the contributions of my professor and adviser. He is considered an authority in health care policy and management, so I do not see what is wrong if I edit and cite his scientific works in Wikipedia. My purpose is to prevent Wikipedia from being viewed simply as a collection of of subjective or non-peer-reviewed opinions/findings. By citing this professor (and later, another professor of mine), I am trying to present neutral, objective, peer-reviewed scientific work/evidence to support or qualify certain points made in Wikipedia health-related articles. Of course, I adhere to WP:MEDRS which is why my edits/citations come from reputable medical and public health journals like the Oxford Journal of Public Health, Health Policy, Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, Health Care Analysis,etc. I am not engaging in any editorial fight nor do I have any COI. I simply started with one professor as a new contributor and plan to move to another professor, when you guys started ganging up on me.Jonathan Mcrey (talk) 01:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Jonathan Mcrey (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying your relationship with the author of the publications. I hope you understand that sometimes people come to Wikipedia to push their own work, and this is the only real reason we have given the impression of "ganging up" on you. Please bear with us.

I don't get the feeling you've got a handle on how WP:MEDRS works. Most papers you added are primary research or modelling studies. That makes them primary sources, irrespective of whether they are published in high impact factor peer reviewed journals. For example, we do not add citations to major research studies even from the New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet or JAMA. We do rely on the reviews published in those journals, and on textbooks. This is a key difference between an academic paper and an encyclopedia; further information can be found in WP:PSTS.

Thanks for your time. Please stick around & drop me a message if you have any further queries. JFW | T@lk 09:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Mcrey, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jonathan Mcrey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]