User talk:Johnmylove

Welcome!

Hello, Johnmylove! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 13:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Centenary Methodist Church, Hyderabad has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=22308341801.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links to avoid on Wikipedia

There are many to avoid, see: Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. Avoid linking to Facebook, MySpace, or to a website which shows recent song lyrics or other material without the proper permission at that website. Also, it depends on each user: do not link to a website which is a personal conflict of interest (such as a website you or your employer own). Avoid sites advocating criminal activities, or which publish unfounded rumors about living people, etc. -Wikid77 01:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Narayanguda cemetry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Narayanguda cemetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dusti^*poke* 04:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexandre Slaviero

The article Alexandre Slaviero has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of N. Raj Prakash Paul

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on N. Raj Prakash Paul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fæ (talk) 17:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at N. Raj Prakash Paul

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from N. Raj Prakash Paul, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with N. Raj Prakash Paul. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at N. Raj Prakash Paul

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with N. Raj Prakash Paul. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:MUSICBIO and WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the message you left at User talk:SDPatrolBot. That user will not be able to respond to your message because it is a "bot", an automatic system, whose job is to put back a speedy-deletion tag if the article author improperly takes it off. If you want N. Raj Prakash Paul to have an article you should read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (people) and WP:MUSICBIO, and provide references which show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandre Slaviero deletion

Hi,

I've had to delete this article by policy, but I thought it would be helpful if I gave you more of an explanation. I saw the note on your user page saying you were concerned about articles being deleted, and in this case, I thought I'd at least make an attempt to explain why this is being deleted. If you understand why this article is being deleted perhaps that will help your future efforts. The biggest issue here is references. On the English wikipedia, there is a policy that says that new biographies of living people must have reliable sources. Unfortunately, it is sometimes hard to tell what Wikipedia considers reliable, but in most cases that requires newspaper articles, magazine articles, or references in published books. In general, sources written about the subject by themselves, such as blogs and Facebook pages are not usually considered sufficiently reliable. And frustratingly, IMDB is not considered reliable, nor are references to other Wikipedia articles.

If you have questions about whether a source is reliable enough, there is a noticeboard here where you can ask questions about particular sources. Sources need not be in English. WP:RS and WP:BLP will provide more information about the various policies involved.

If, after reading those policies you can find two or three reliable sources for the Slaviero article, drop me a note on my Talk page and I will be more than happy to undelete the article for you, or you can (in that case) request undeletion here. Feel free to drop me a note on my Talk page if you have any questions. Best, --joe decker ^{talk to me} 07:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work

Hey, thanks for all your tireless contributions towards articles concerning Christianity in India and Andhra Pradesh in particular. Keep up the good work. We should collaborate and spruce up some more articles.--Kurienne (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Hello, Johnmylove. You have new messages at Drmargi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fourfiftytwo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For Your kind information, I don't have any Extra Id other than this, and I am not a sock puppet, I have checked the investigation article which I think is doing complete injustice to me. If user named Kurienne appreciates my talent on my talk page, What is my fault then? It was his personal appreciation. Please dont involve me in such wrong accusations which I dont agree upon. I have no connection with any other users. This may be a Misconception or case of Misidentity --Johnmylove (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have also gone through the whole investigation page and I have found that the User:Omer123hussain is falsely accusing me of any sock puppetry. I believe making any wrong accusations against any user without any evident proof proves some kind of personal agenda of this User:Omer123hussain, severe action should be taken against him. --Johnmylove (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You may be in danger of breaching 3RR here Anders Behring Breivik I susgest you take you susgested edits to the talk page and explain your reasoning.Slatersteven (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think u have some personal agenda and sorry you are in trouble of breaching 3RR for trying to delete my well sourced material...and I am not into your talk page. --Johnmylove (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your material is ot well sources, inly one of them says he is a practising Hindoo, and it may not even be RS.Slatersteven (talk) 16:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well sourced??? they are 100 % well sourced. You can read them if You have ant doubt, If you deleted my source and then other sources should also deleted as they are not much sourced as much as mine do. --Johnmylove (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have now launched an ANI http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Anders_Behring_Breivik you have edoted the page over this issue at least four time now. Moreover only one of your sources claims he is a Hindoo, and that may not be RS.Slatersteven (talk) 16:45, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not reliable sources. You're disrupting Wikipedia and on a high visibility, current event related page. This is not acceptable behavior.

If you continue you will be blocked from editing to end the disruption. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 18:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ajay Cavalli

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ajay Cavalli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dismas|^(talk) 14:29, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Rensil D'Silva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurbaan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Kalpana Kartik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BLP violation

Please do not place this BLP violation on the Michael Lucas article for a third time. The inflammatory quote you inserted is fabricated, or at least it exists nowhere else on the Internet. This unsourced sentence is inherently POV: "Lucas himself, however, has demonstrated a lack of tolerance for others, for Christianity in general, and abused Jesus Christ." I'm glad you are here editing Wikipedia, but BLP violations are serious infractions, especially when you insert them a second time after being made aware of the policy violation. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Happy editing. --David Shankbone 23:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KarismaKapoors.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KarismaKapoors.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:30, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Baptistchurchnagaland.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Baptistchurchnagaland.jpg, which you've sourced to an unnamed archive. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CSIChurch.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:CSIChurch.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Standrewchurchsec.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Standrewchurchsec.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Biblekikahaniya.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Biblekikahaniya.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unverified information in a BLP

Hi Johnmylove:
Please do not add unverified information in a BLP, as you did by reverting my changes in Rachel Chatterjee. Please discuss any change first at Talk:Rachel_Chatterjee#Unverified_information_in_a_BLP. Thanks. EngineerFromVega ^★ 09:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vikram Sohan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vikram Sohan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dmol (talk) 07:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AN notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Johnmylove". Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 19:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kareenaatfilmfare.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Kareenaatfilmfare.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parveen in Shaan1980.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parveen in Shaan1980.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parveen in Namak Halal.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parveen in Namak Halal.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andhra Pradesh Board of Secondary Education

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andhra Pradesh Board of Secondary Education requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pol430 talk to me 20:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the above, my bad. Pol430 talk to me 20:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Passion of the Christ, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Christianity in India, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raul Patil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raul Patil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raul Patil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tiptoety ^talk 18:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. See diff. "Gandu Hindoo complexity" is not so nice. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I endorse the above. It is very strange behavior to warn an editor for making personal attacks[1] while linking to an egregious attack you made against him.[2] Since you know how to post No personal attack warnings, I hope you also know what the policy No personal attacks actually says? If not, read it, please. Never again speculate about any editor's mental health, or you will be blocked. Bishonen | talk 16:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia is a place where any user with a source and a reference can edit article the way he wants to interpret, specially the regular users but I randomly edit articles once in a while when I find that a source in the internet is altering from the given information, away from the one mentioned in wikipedia page. I am not a regular wikipedia editor like the User, who may or may not alter information intentionally. I add information that is important and delete information that is unnecessary and illogical and does not have an approved genuine explanation. The attacking User adds unnecessary information which was never part of original text. He added Vulgar criticism against Christian and Jesus pages. I never edit Hindoo or their related articles because I am not interested in them. When I am not interested in Hinduism, I dont edit their related pages also, infact I have never read them, forget about editing.. The attacking user is notorious for adding anti christian statements on Christian pages , in response, I have just removed them, as those were added recently by him. For that he called me non-sensical.Johnmylove (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, you have a WP:COI, and you can't tell the difference between "non-sensical" and "Gandu Hindoo complexity". The last term is a gross insult. If you yourself are hurt that easily, maybe you shouldn't be editing here at all. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continual bigoted comments based on other editors' perceived religion and ethnicity, after warnings to stop. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zoltan Parag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoltan Parag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoltan Parag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Boolywood actor Raj Kiran" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Boolywood actor Raj Kiran. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 21#Boolywood actor Raj Kiran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]