User talk:Joaopais

You can talk with me in Portuguese, English, Spanish, Galician or French. I'll answer in Portuguese or English. Thanks.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Parken Stadium; Guimarães; Januária, Princess Imperial of Brazil; Berengária of Portugal; Steve Claridge; 2000 African Cup of Nations; Joan of Habsburg; Antónia of Braganza; Luísa, Duchess of Cadaval; Edward, Duke of Guimarães; Dean Shiels; ŠK Slovan Bratislava; Maud of Savoy; Maria da Assunção of Braganza; List of football clubs in the Czech Republic; Águeda; MTK Hungária FC; Isabel Luísa of Braganza; Valletta FC

Cleanup: Culture of Portugal; Carapelhos; Erc of Dalriada
Merge: Lusitanic; New Zealand national soccer team; Grand Alliance
Add Sources: Hospital Pulido Valente; Demographics of the European Union; FK Partizan
Wikify: David Cohen Nassy; Chris Romanelli; Minom
Expand: Arthur Sullivan; European exploration of Africa; Demographic history of Portugal

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese Empire

Fiz uma introdução para o artigo, tentei ser um pouco mais concreto que a antiga mas não a fiz muito grande pois acho que deve ficar mais ou menos assim em tamanho. Que achas? Vou tentar fazer um mapa do império que este tá um bocado pixelizado. Como é com as imagens para por? Eu estava a pensar pôr uma imagem do planisfério Cantino de 1503 e parte do atlas de João Vaz Dourado (é de 1571), tava a pensar escolher a parte da Terra dos Corte Reais, pois parece que ninguém acredita que Portugal teve mesmo essas terras. Mas tirei as imagens de um site. Dado que são património e não privadas (digo eu), pode-se pôr sem ligar a copyrights?--Câmara 15:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gostava que me ajudasse a editar uma página da wikipedia. É a página "Great Powers", antes de ter sido modificada Portugal constava como tendo sido uma grande potência até 1580. Depois de terem editado a página removeram Portugal da lista, o que é de rir, visto que nos séculos XV, XVI e XVII eramos uma das maiores potências mundiais, tendo chegado a ser uma das duas maiores juntamente com a Espanha, embora na realidade Portugal fosse mais importante, a Espanha era uma potência mais continental enquanto Portugal era mais global e tivesse mais capacidades científicas, humanas e de conhecimento.

O que eu pretendo é reincluir Portugal, mas gostava de uma data certa para o nosso início como grande potência, porque nos outros países essa data está incluida e tem de ser uma data correcta. Não consigo chegar sozinho a uma data real que permita colocar como início do periodo de grande potência de Portugal. A data final tenho intenção de colocar 1580 como estava mas só para o fim da nossa primeira etapa. Depois pretendo incluir uma sgunda época, de 1640 a 1822-na sequência das invasões Napoleónicas e independência do Brasil.

ACamposPinho 3 August 2006, 2:10

Catarina Eufémia

Olá, João.

I thought you might be interested to know that Catarina Eufémia has been removed from the Good Articles list (the reasons are on its talk page.) If you know of some good references to add to it (or if you can properly cite the ones that are there) that would be great... I was going to tell Mário about it since he had somewhat of an investment in it, which is when I found out that he had left the building. :-( Thanks! Grand master ka 06:59, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peniche prison

Hi, I am looking for confirmation of the existence of a prison at Peniche during the Salazar period. There is nothing at the Peniche page about the prison. Do you have any information?

Regards,

61.246.204.116 16:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Queiroz

Hi, please don't revert all my edits to this article in one fell swoop - the version you revert it to is a clear copyvio of http://www.manutdzone.com/playerpages/CarlosQueiroz.htm I know I've axed quite a bit of the article, but without doing that I would have put it up for deletion because of the copyvio. Please share your thoughts on my talk page. Poulsen 05:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I probably shouldn't have removed the honor title from the start, but it was redlinked and I couldn't find the exact thing with a quick google search. But it's good to see it has an article now! Cheers. Poulsen 16:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Henry of Portugal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Henry of Portugal.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Angr 13:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Artigo sobre Lídia Jorge

Olá, João. O meu nome é Nuno Quintas, sou de Portugal e inscrevi-me ontem na Wikipedia. Ando a investigar as páginas sobre Portugal, em particular de literatura portuguesa (sou da área dos estudos literários, pelo que creio que as minhas contribuições mais fortes poderão registar-se aí). Notei que é s um dos utilizadores portugueses mais activos (em particular na área da História) e, nesse sentido, venho pedir-te ajuda como novato:

Reparei que não existia nenhum artigo sobre a Lídia Jorge, pelo que resolvi criar uma entrada (que irei trabalhar ao longo dos próximos tempos). Contudo, reparo agora que a página que criei ficou com o apelido da autora em minúscula (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/L%C3%ADdia_jorge). Não consegui encontrar nenhuma indicação sobre como resolver o problema; assim sendo, é possível corrigir a situação? De que forma? --Stark Major 17:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Freixo de Espada à Cinta

Relativamente à alteração que acabou de efectuar (transcrição fonética de Freixo de Espada à Cinta), creio que seria mais adequado manter a transcrição anterior, ou pelo menos ambas as variantes. A transcrição com "ð" é a que me é mais familiar (cresci em Trás-os-Montes e ouvi o nome dessa localidade inúmeras vezes). Eu próprio pronuncio com "ð". Cumprimentos--Hús ö nd 00:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado pela resposta rápida. Achei válido o argumento da simplificação. De facto talvez seja melhor assim para não complicar as transcrições. Abraço.--Hús ö nd 01:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muito agradeço o convite. Por acaso ainda esta semana visitei o portal. Não tenho grande experiência com portais, talvez esteja na altura de me empenhar num. :-) Neste momento estou a pesquisar para outro projecto, mas creio que rapidamente possa começar a contribuir, nomeadamente na expansão de artigos sobre municípios transmontanos. Abraço. --Hús ö nd 02:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gostaria de te convidar a participar na proposta de remoção do artigo TV5 (Portugal), o presumível quinto canal português. Discussão aqui. Obrigado. --Hús ö nd 18:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Póvoa de Varzim

muito pelo contrário, obrigado. Quero po-lo como FA, foi o que disse ao pessoal da câmara se eles me dessem fotos. LOL. Logo copyedits são muito importantes, e viste algumas coisas que já ninguém reparava. Só o bacalhau é que se calhar deveria manter-se em bacalhau lol, já que é um prato especifico portugues, tal como o resto dos links. Vou po-lo novamente em breve para consideração para FA, espero ter a tua opinião nessa altura. Gostava que os artigos das outras cidades portuguesas estivessem tb desenvolvidos quer aqui quer na wiki de ling.port. um abraço. --Pedro 10:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal

Olá outra vez. Tenho uma dúvida sobre como propor uma imagem para a secção Selected Picture do Portal:Portugal. É suposto colocar uma entrada no campo Choose the next selected "Selected picture" que depois irá para votação ou algo do género? A página não dá instruções claras. Abraço.--Hús ö nd 23:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

João acho que é duplo r: "ar.ri.ba" "car.ro" é como no espanhol. agora se fica a<lar>riba ou ala<Ri>ba é que se calhar tens razão. Quanto ao R, é opcional eu prefiro por direito porque tenho no teclado e é válido na mesma e é o que vejo nas publicações. --Pedro 23:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tás enganado, hás-de reparar na pronuncia das pessoas do interior e verás que a maioria ainda pronuncia \rr\ por exemplo rra.tu. (rato) car.ru (carro). vê Trill_consonant e o que tiveres sobre isso. o \R\ é uma coisa recente. --Pedro 10:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calapez

Bem meu Calapez vem de meu avô que era de Cercal do Alentejo --Calapez 25 September 2006

Alcácer Quibir

Caro João:

Escrevo a propósito da Discussão sobre o artigo Batalha de Alcácer Quibir (EN). Fiz uma promessa e não queria deixá-la por cumprir, mas como sou novato... não me oriento assim tão bem. Quero (preciso de!) corrigir a "Campaignbox Reconquista", que inclui erradamente a batalha de má memória em 1578. Será que é preciso ser administrador para poder alterar formatações/templates? Obrigado e parabéns sinceros pelo trabalho, Nuno Gabriel Cabral 10:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certíssimo, João, isto de ser principiante... é assim! Claro que vou juntar uma justificação, que depois te convido a ver e completar, se achares necessário. Novamente obrigado, Nuno Gabriel Cabral 16:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imagem no Portal

Olá João. A data que tinha proposto para a imagem que candidatei ao Portal:Portugal é hoje. Como ninguém entretanto se opôs, será de presumir que a imagem foi aceite ou nem por isso? Abraço. --Hús ö nd 19:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship in Portugal

Hi Joaopais! I was wondering if you might like to help expand this article by translation from the featured Portuguese article. I don't speak or read Portuguese, so I've just created a stub by translating some of es:Censura en Portugal. But I really think the English Wikipedia needs to cover this topic in greater depth than just a stub article. Can you help? Thank you! -Fsotrain₀₉ 21:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excelente trabalho!

Olá, João Pais!

Eu sou um utilizador assíduo e editor básico (muito básico mesmo!) da Wikipedia (inglesa, sobretudo - mais informação). Dei pela tua existência através de edits que fizeste na página dos 1.os Jogos da Lusofonia - Macau 2006 e fiquei espantadíssimo com a "biblioteca" de trabalho que fizeste em prol de Portugal e do que é português!!!! 2 anos a melhorar a Wikipédia portuguesa, merece os meus sinceros aplausos e parabéns. E tudo com uma qualidade e pormenor louváveis.

Como já disse, também já editei extensamente algumas páginas (Euro 2004; Fernanda Ribeiro) que tu até já editaste com a pronunciação IPA, que tanto gostas, hehe.

Teria imenso gosto em poder contribuir para o teu trabalho. Achas que posso estar à altura? :D O que poderei fazer?

Cumprimentos! --parutakupiu 03:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Alguma coisa"?

Quão modesto! :D Precisava de vários dias para explorar completamente o teu trabalho! Neste momento, como poderás confirmar na minha página, estou licenciado "de fresco" e ando à procura de trabalho na minha área (tenho umas bolsas em vista às quais me vou candidatar); se conseguir um lugar o meu tempo não será muito, basicamente só fins-de-semana, mas se não tiver a sorte, tempo livre é o que não me faltará. Por isso, não me importo nada de me juntar à equipa do Portal de Portugal, só espero é poder estar à altura do trabalho. Para isso, claro vou precisar da vossa ajuda e indicações. Quanto aos meus interesses... podes não acreditar, mas História é mesmo um dos meus grandes! Sobretudo genealogias reais da Europa (e também não-europeias) - sou fã! Não é tanto história em si, é mais uma pequena parte dela, mas penso que posso ajudar-te nesses artigos que pretendes explorar. Mas o mais importante é o ínicio: por onde começo?? Há TANTA coisa por fazer que até fico atrapalhado...

Portuguese football league system

Acho que não era má ideia adicionarmos o artigo Portuguese football league system ao Template:Football in Portugal, mas não sei exactamente onde por, porque não encaixa em nenhuma categoria das já existentes. Tens alguma sugestão para isso? Abraço --Serte 13:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:António Granjo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:António Granjo.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Timichal 14:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Portuguese history

Given your apparent extensive knowledge about Portuguese history, I'd like to ask you a question about coups and military uprisings in Portugal. Recently, the head of the Thai military junta said that he learned from the "Portuguese example" when he planned to stage his coup on the same day as an anti-government rally. My first guess is that he was referring to 5 October 1910, when the military seized power on the same day as a major republican demonstration. But where there any other successful coups in Portugal that coincided with major protests? Patiwat 01:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alô; Wikiproject Portugal

Alô. Acabei de criar o Wikiproject Portugal numa tentativa de reunir o máximo de gente num consenso de melhoramento e criação de artigos sobre Portugal aqui na Wp EN. Como tu és uma das pessoas mais activas no trabalho sobre artigos Portugueses, eu tenho a certeza que isto é do teu interesse.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 15:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado por adiocionares o teu nome ao projecto. Poderias ajudar-me talvez a adicionar o template do projecto nas páginas de discussão dos artigos relacionados com Portugal? Isso seria mt útil.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 11:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comité Olímpico de Portugal

Oi, João! Publiquei ontem um artigo bem alargado sobre o Comité Olímpico de Portugal (COP), na Wikipedia inglesa. Estive a trabalhar nele durante uns bons dias, daí não ter dito mais nada entretanto. Acho que está bem completo, mas há sempr qualquer coisa que se pode alterar. Como verás, também criei uns templates associados. Tentei escrever o nome do artigo no sistema IPA, mas como o "expert" és tu, gostava que corrigisses.

Entretanto, já adicionei o artigo à secção de novos artigos no Portal Portugal. Cumps! Parutakupiu ^{talk || contribs} 19:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gil Vicente

Já te conheço como grande editor da Wikipedia, principalmente em grandes artigos relacionados com Portugal. Queria-te pedir se podias acabar a tradução do artigo da Wikipedia Portuguesa sobre pt:Gil Vicente para o da Wikipedia Inglesa Gil Vicente. Eu já fiz grande parte da tradução e tu fizeste um óptimo cleanup, mas não consigo traduzir mais, tenho sérias dificuldades e empanco em muitas palavras. Começam a ser termos demasiado difíceis. Se puderes acabá-la, agradecia. Falta só um pequeno pedaço. Abraço, continua o bom trabalho --Serte 14:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado ;) --Serte 16:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Maria of Castile and Aragon

Dear João: Where did you find the portrait of Maria of Castile and Aragon? Do you know anything of its origin and history?

Many thanks in advance,

Maria Torres elena@pipeline.com

Image tagging for Image:Younger_salazar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Younger_salazar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

Alô. Será q poderias pôr o "Did you know" da tua user page numa template? Género {{User:Joaopais/DYK}}? Eu adoraria ter algo assim na minha própria user page, e talvez haja mais gente q o queira. Com um template todos os q quisessem poderiam ter um DYK sobre Portugal e sempre q fosse actualizado, toda a gente ficava com a actualização.

Se o quiseres fazer, mas precisares de ajuda, contacta-me.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 19:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uma pergunta de pronúncia

Olá! Estou aprendendo português, e vi o teu bom trabalho na lista Swadesh. Quero perguntar-te sobre a pronúncia brasileira. Pensas que uma boa esquema de transcrição é usar [x] para a r inicial e dupla, [ɾ] para a r entre vogais, e [ʁ] para a r preconsonántica e final? No último caso, tenho lido que a [ɾ] é fora de moda. Ao mesmo tempo, a [x] me soa demasiado áspera. Assim a variação sistemática entre [x] e [ʁ] é boa para a pronúncia brasileira moderna? Obrigadinho! --Lazar Taxon 22:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spoken article

Hi. I've noticed that you appear to have been working on converting the article Portuguese language into a spoken version for over six months now, according to your entry on the In Progress secton of Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia. If you are no longer working on the article, please either remove yourself from the list, or notify me so I can do so, so other editors will know they can work on the article instead. If you don't reply within a week, I will assume you are no longer working on the article. Cheers, H4cksaw (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mario_Soares.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mario_Soares.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 14:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alfredo de Sa Cardoso.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alfredo de Sa Cardoso.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map of the Portuguese Empire

Hello João Pais! A long time ago we talked about having an anachronous map of the whole Portuguese Empire (1415-1999). I made this:

What do you think? You can participate in its discussion at Talk:Portuguese Empire and Talk:Evolution of the Portuguese Empire. Obrigado! The Ogre 15:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JoseSocrates3.jpg

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:JoseSocrates3.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bernardino Machado.jpg

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bernardino Machado.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Canto e Castro.jpg

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Canto e Castro.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cavaco silva gd1.jpg

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Cavaco silva gd1.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gomes da Costa.jpg

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Gomes da Costa.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marcellocaetano.jpg

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Marcellocaetano.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mendes Cabeçadas.jpg

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Mendes Cabeçadas.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mota Pinto.gif

Hello, Joaopais. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Mota Pinto.gif) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nobre da Costa.gif

Hello Joaopais, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nobre da Costa.gif) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Palma Carlos.jpg

Hello Joaopais, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Palma Carlos.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pinheiro de Azevedo.jpg

Hello Joaopais, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Pinheiro de Azevedo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sidonio Pais.jpg

Hello Joaopais, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Sidonio Pais.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Teofilo braga.jpg

Hello Joaopais, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Teofilo braga.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Joaopais/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Macau 2006 Jogos da Lusofonia.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Macau 2006 Jogos da Lusofonia.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Portugal Army.png

Hi, thanks for pointing out the error and thanks for the praise :-) If anything else needs to be changed/added, just let me know. From now on the image is here commons:Image:Portugal Army.png (not anymore on english Wikipedia). I made a Portuguese version of the image just now: commons:Image:Exército Português.png, but I did not add it to the article Exército Português yet, as I'm a bit confused, because according to the English wikipedia the 3rd Paratrooper Infantry Battalion has been dissolved and the Grupo de Artilharia de Campanha of the Rapid Reaction Brigade have been handed over to the Intervention Brigade. In exchange a Commando Battalion and Special Operations Forces Battalion have been added to the Rapid Reaction Brigade. The Portuguese graphic is made accordingly see here, but the English graphic is still the old version see here. Could you please help to clarify this issue? I tried, but the official Portuguese Army website, does not help (it always get "Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e14'" when I click on Organização). Thank you in adavance for any help, --noclador 09:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Portuguese District Football Associations

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Portuguese District Football Associations, by Shadyaftrmathgunit (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Portuguese District Football Associations fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

moved all this info into the Football in Portugal template so this template is no longer needed

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Portuguese District Football Associations, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Portuguese District Football Associations itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy tag and opened a discussion about it at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 June 18. Cheers! -- lucasbfr ^talk 11:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

House of Braganza

Hi Joaopais;

Thanks for leaving me a message on my page. I don't think that the lengthy titles are required in the template, or even several of the titles for any given title. It should be narrowed down to the one title used most to refer to the person, for the sake of brevity and clarity. Granted, some titles are importants, such as the title indicated the first among the infantes, however it is not used in daily use to refer to the person. Charles 15:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Architects

Hey Joao, I notice you previously edited Eduardo Souto de Moura, the article appears to have existed for three years as an unverified stub with one external blogspot link.. There must be sources to put this in line with WP:BIO? There also seems to be a disagreement over whether he or Álvaro Siza Vieira designed Trindade (station), any ideas? Obrigado, Deiz talk 15:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olá

Olá João, sou eu, o Afonso. Recebi o teu email e decidi dizer-te qualquer coisa. Está tudo bem contigo? Um abraço! 84.91.38.38 17:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Afonso! Então? Essa vida? É estranho ver-te assim anónimo... Pá, então o que se passou contigo? Qual a razão de tão inesperada retirada? Isto estava-te a tirar muito tempo, provavelmente. Desde que saíste nunca mais isto foi o mesmo. Eu já quase não edito nada nem tenho assim nenhum grande projecto entre mãos. Há alguma hipótese de regresso? Um grande abraço, Afonso. Espero que esteja tudo bem. Joao pais 00:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:3rd Count of Castelho Melhor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3rd Count of Castelho Melhor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Conscious 19:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Energy portal review

Hi Joaopais. Knowing that you have an interest in an unconnected featured portal, I wondered if you might like to comment on the one I've been working on - energy portal - which is now under consideration for featured status. Compared to other candidates it has had relatively few people contributing to the debate, despite being up for discussion for 2 months. If you have time perhaps you would like to take a look? The candidate page can be found here. Gralo 18:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese footballers

Using full name, because, to disambiguation people! Even using First name and last name, it still lot of people of same name with different "mid". So, at least don't move the pages to just have their common one word shirt name, for example Dani and Carlos.

Better you search it form http://www.zerozero.pt, to look for some professional footballer with same name but don't have a wiki article. There is lots for Portuguese footballers in top division football, but don't have article. Matthew_hk t c 17:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado

João, obrigado! Vejo que você está usando a categoria Presidential candidates. Isso está muito bom. Grato, Mxcatania 19:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Liga de Honra teamlist

A template you created, Template:Liga de Honra teamlist, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 23:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mudança do Marcello

Obrigado pela nota. Tinha-me esquecido dessas contra-indicações contra as deslocações manuais. Peço imensa desculpa. :-) Velho 16:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible downgrading of A1 GP WikiProject to Taskforce status

Several users have started a conversation at WP:MOTOR about the possible downgrading of the A1 GP WikiProject to taskforce staus. I have notified you because your name is on the A1 GP Members list. The discussion is ongoing, and is located here. Davnel03 18:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fb templates

Agora o template aceita 16 times. Não sei se você percebeu, mas tem outros templates para a tabela de classificação e para criar articos sobre a temporada de um time. Se precisar de mais ajudar, pode entrar em contato.

Now the template accepts 16 teams. I don't know if you realize, but there are other templates for the classification table and to create a team season's article. If you need more help, please contact me. Regards. --ClaudioMB 16:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. By the way, I'm Brazilian. Nice to meet you. :-) --ClaudioMB 16:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Barreirense.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Barreirense.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 14:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style for club season articles

As you have often contribute to club season articles, I believe this and this are pretty much of your interest.--ClaudioMB 15:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Mouzinho de Albuquerque.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Mouzinho de Albuquerque.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dantadd 01:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football Kit

Hey Joaopais, do you still want me to make the Snake football kits? I have finally finished my move from Nicaragua all the way to Indonesia. I know it has been a while, I'm sorry for that. If I can still be of any help, let me know.Guus Hoekman 11:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

On 17 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Portuguese football champions, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 15:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SC Covilha.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SC Covilha.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 01:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:General Carmona.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:General Carmona.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Antonio de Spinola.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonio de Spinola.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 17:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOTD experiment

My userpage List of the Day experiment is getting under way at WP:LOTD. One of your lists has been nominated. I invite you to come by and represent it. If you would like to represent your list article please reformat your username in the table so it is normal sized. Among the things you may want to do to represent your list are:

Change the image selection
Add talk page projects to the list and then add them on the summary table
Write a summary of the article in less than 500 characters. I will begin doing this later today for those who don't do it themselves.
Participate in the feed back process when it starts on December 1.
Participate in the voting when it starts on December 11.

You are free to remain uninvolved. Your list was chosen for being among the first [[WP:FL]s ever created.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 19:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Freitas do Amaral.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Freitas do Amaral.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Although it may not seem as such, I am willing to contribute to articles on the English Wikipedia relating to the Portuguese language; just check out and watch my user page and talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 19:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LOTD

List of Portuguese monarchs has been selected as a list of the Day for the month of April. Let me know if you have any strong date preferences before March 26th. Since it placed in the top 5 it will be recognized on two days during the month.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 07:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Antonio of Portugal.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Antonio of Portugal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Antonio of Portugal.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 23:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Domingos Leite Pereira.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Domingos Leite Pereira.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ginestal Machado.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ginestal Machado.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Joaquim António de Aguiar.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Joaquim António de Aguiar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Joaquim António de Aguiar.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:José Domingues dos Santos.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:José Domingues dos Santos.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Kit body Omoscavidekit.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Kit body Omoscavidekit.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Kit body Omoscavidekit.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Kit body Omoscavidekit2.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Kit body Omoscavidekit2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Kit body Omoscavidekit2.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Maia Pinto.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Maia Pinto.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Norton de Matos.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Norton de Matos.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Olivais e Moscavide logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Olivais e Moscavide logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Joao III of Portugal.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Joao III of Portugal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Joaquim António de Aguiar.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Joaquim António de Aguiar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Lisboa sec 16.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Lisboa sec 16.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 13:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Wenceslau Pereira de Lima.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Wenceslau Pereira de Lima.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Braamcamp.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Braamcamp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Capitanias.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Capitanias.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 03:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Portuguese football stadia by capacity - major discrepancies!

Hi, I'm bringing this to your attention as you seem to have been the major editor of the article, please see my comment at Talk:List of Portuguese football stadia by capacity Grunners (talk) 00:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Madeira work group

Hello! I see you are a participant in Wikipedia:WikiProject Portugal. You may want to come to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Africa/Madeira work group and participate / help. Thanks! The Ogre (talk) 15:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of municipalities of Portugal nominated at FLRC

Hello, List of municipalities of Portugal has been nominated at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BlankMap-World-detailed.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BlankMap-World-detailed.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian painter Humberto Rosa is not Humberto Rosa (football player), and not Humberto Rosa (politician)

Hi,

1st of all, sorry to write to you in English, since we're Portuguese-speakers. It is that i suppose we should make our communication more widely available to other English Wikipedia editors.

That said, i'd like to congratulate you for your impressive work in Wikipedia.

I'm writing because i'd like to tell you about the need to distinguish three different persons: a Brazilian painter from 19th century, an Argentinian football player and a Portuguese politician, all named Humberto Rosa.

Since no mention to any others was available when i created the article, i'd suggest that the Brazilian painter Humberto Rosa be the owner of the name, and all others should have a distinguishing suffix. For instance, i already proposed Humberto Rosa (football player) for the Argentinian guy, and would like to suggest you to use Humberto Rosa (politician).

What do you think ?

All the best,
--Hgfernan (talk) 02:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bernardino Machado 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Bernardino Machado 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That one's intended for you (I moved the picture to an other name due to a naming conflict with Commons) -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

L velar

Bom dia João! Muitas vezes tenho uma dúvida acerca da pronúncia da letra L em português: em quais caso é velar e em quais não? Coloquei aqui Talk:Deolinda uma pergunta relacionada: talvez saibas responder. Obrigado desde já. --GiovanniS (talk) 06:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Vimara_peres.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vimara_peres.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mario Soares (official).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mario Soares (official).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History of Portugal (1777–1834) FAR

I have nominated History of Portugal (1777–1834) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Kensplanet^T _C 16:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of El Qsar es Seghir

A tag has been placed on El Qsar es Seghir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. There was nothing but a recently created (wrong) redirect, which had been blanked by an IP. Intelligentsium 01:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gomes da Costa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gomes da Costa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 20:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gomes da Costa (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gomes da Costa (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 06:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Craveiro Lopes (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Craveiro Lopes (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 06:09, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antonio de Spinola (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antonio de Spinola (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 06:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liga Vitalis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liga Vitalis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 06:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Joaopais! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Bruno Costa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vasco de Almeida e Costa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Batatinha - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oliveira Salazar (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oliveira Salazar (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 11:39, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

War Edition at Dili

Users J. Patrick Fischer (talk) Merbabu (talk) and Darwinius (talk) are removing systematically the symbols of the city alleging they are not used anymore. The problem is that they doesn´t quote any relevant source to remove the symbols and prove they are not used anymore, despite there´s a law supporting them. I gave the data, he is disputing it, just for personal taste. Domaleixo (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.41.242.19 (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Alfredo de Sa Cardoso.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alfredo de Sa Cardoso.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Alfredo Rodrigues Gaspar.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alfredo Rodrigues Gaspar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:30, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Pingo Doce Logo.jpg

You forgot to add a purpose of use to the non-free image File:Pingo Doce Logo.jpg that you uploaded recently. Each non-free image must have a fully completed fair use rationale. ww2censor (talk) 13:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Costa Gomes.jpg.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Costa Gomes.jpg.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured portal review/Portugal

I've listed Portal:Portugal for a featured portal review as I think that it fails to meet the Featured portal criteria since it has not been updated for so long. Please join in the discussion and / or help to improve the portal to modern standards. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 17:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

António André

Hello! I have a doubt about this player. In his page, the name is António André dos Santos Ferreira, but many other sources adfirm António dos Santos Ferreira André. You are Portuguese, so you probably know how is the correct name. Please, you write me here. Obrigado!! --VAN ZANT (talk) 10:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freitas do Amaral.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freitas do Amaral.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Os Grandes Portugueses

The article Os Grandes Portugueses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, possibly copyvio. cf. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/200 Greatest Israelis. List articles that simply reproduce lists published elsewhere are non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Os Grandes Portugueses for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Os Grandes Portugueses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Os Grandes Portugueses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese translation

Hello. I was on Wikipedia:Translators available and notice that you were on the list for Portuguese to English translators and wondered if you could translate [[[Prince Peter of Saxe-Coburg-Kohary]]? Thank you or obrigado.The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 13:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pinto Balsemao.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pinto Balsemao.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vasco Gonçalves.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vasco Gonçalves.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Augusto de Vasconcelos.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Augusto de Vasconcelos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jorge Sampaio (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jorge Sampaio (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vitor Hugo Azevedo Coutinho.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vitor Hugo Azevedo Coutinho.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sa Carneiro.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sa Carneiro.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Portugal-noble-stub listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Portugal-noble-stub. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Portugal-noble-stub redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). PamD 14:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tradução

Teria como terminar de traduzir essa página? Grato. 189.101.40.134 (talk) 11:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sidonio Pais (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sidonio Pais (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sidonio Pais (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sidonio Pais (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teixeira Gomes (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teixeira Gomes (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ramalho Eanes (official).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ramalho Eanes (official).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Is it possible you translate this article? Gratefull. 2804:14C:5BB6:802D:E269:95FF:FE51:FF80 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pedir um favor

Será que poderias traduzir este artigo do português para o inglês? Att (Saudações Brasileiras). 187.104.25.153 (talk) 05:06, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teofilo Braga (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teofilo Braga (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia Revival

Hello, I'm Jamesjpk. I wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia, has been tagged with a semi-active tag. I am messaging you about this because you are listed under the wiki-project's list of active participants. Please contribute to the WikiProject if you want to keep it alive! I hope that it becomes active again! Jamesjpk (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AF Porto.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AF Porto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lusophone Games

Hi, I don't know if you're still active, but I just wandered into the talk page on the Lusofonia Games that you edited in 2006. The correct English translation is "Lusophone," not "Lusophony" which doesn't exist as a word in Engllish. This means a lot of pages/page titles would have to be changed. But as it is, there are dozens of Wikipedia pages with a non-existent English word in their title. What to do? I am also copying the other contributor on that talk page. Maybe we should continue the conversation there? Bruxism (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bernardino Machado (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bernardino Machado (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Costa Gomes (official).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Costa Gomes (official).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Costa Gomes (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Costa Gomes (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FA-star-Portugal.png

The file File:FA-star-Portugal.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Portuguese elm.jpg

The file File:Portuguese elm.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image without sufficient context to determine future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 23:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Picture of former Portuguese Prime Minister Manuel Inácio Martins Pamplona Corte-Real, Count of Subserra.jpg

The file File:Picture of former Portuguese Prime Minister Manuel Inácio Martins Pamplona Corte-Real, Count of Subserra.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jose, Principe do Brasil.jpg

The file File:Jose, Principe do Brasil.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Maria Francisca of Savoy.jpg

The file File:Maria Francisca of Savoy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Join WikiProject for Spoken Wikipedia

Hi Joaopais! I am Galendalia and I have revived the WikiProject for Spoken Wikipedia. I noticed that you signed up at some point to be a participant and as I am reviving this project, one of my tasks is to get the participant list in order. Would you please go to the Participants List and add your name and language(s) you speak? If you are already there and do not want to be, please move yourself to the inactive list at the bottom of the page. If you want to remain, please put remain next to your name (this way you are not moved). If I do not see anything from you by May 30, 2020, I will move you to the inactive participant list. It would also be great if you would be willing to join the task force for Pronunciation that would be awesome, as there are troublesome words we run into.

Thank you for considering joining us. If you decide to leave, I will be sad to see you leave as so many people have done a great job on the recordings and any work you have done makes a significant difference.
Galendalia (talk · contribs) (sent via Mass Message. This is a message that is one time, so no unsubscribe link is provided.)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia at 11:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Updates to Spoken Wikipedia

Hello Joaopais! I hope this message finds you well and healthy! I am working this weekend on the Spoken Wikipedia project pages to get them in line with other projects. I just wanted to inform you in advance that some pages may be created. deleted, moved, or otherwise. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them on my talk page.
Thanks, Galendalia (talk) 16:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC) WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia Coordinator[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mendes Cabeçadas (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mendes Cabeçadas (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Portuguese monarchs by longevity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Portuguese monarchs by longevity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Portuguese monarchs by longevity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Portuguese monarchs by age at accession to the throne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Portuguese monarchs by age at accession to the throne, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Portuguese monarchs by longevity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Canto e Castro (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Canto e Castro (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manuel de Arriaga (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manuel de Arriaga (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antonio Jose de Almeida (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antonio Jose de Almeida (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Canto e Castro (official).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Canto e Castro (official).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Conde da Feira.jpg

The file File:Conde da Feira.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Miguel Pereira Forjaz.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manuel Maria Coelho.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manuel Maria Coelho.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Brak-Lamy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Brak-Lamy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 19:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cândido José Xavier.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Cândido José Xavier.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 18:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Charles of Portugal.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Charles of Portugal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 12:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Conde da Barca.jpg

The file File:Conde da Barca.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, superseded by File:Antonio de Azevedo3.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 17:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria of Portugal (nun) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria of Portugal (nun) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria of Portugal (nun) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jaguarnik (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]