User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 71
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jo-Jo Eumerus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 65 | ← | Archive 69 | Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | → | Archive 75 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Jo-Jo,
Your name hasn't come up but there have been questions about a Deletion Review closure you did at this most recent AFD on the film Pathan. I thought you might want to know about it in case you could clarify what you intended to be done after your closure. Thanks and stay well! Liz Read! Talk! 20:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sigh. I knew that DRV was going to become a problem when folks didn't spell out which version to restore. I've written a comment. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2022
- From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief
- News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia
- In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons
- Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results
- WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
- Featured content: Featured Content returns
- Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February
- Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks
- Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate
- Gallery: The vintage exhibit
- Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix
- News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team
- Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles
- Humour: Notability of mailboxes
Hey volcano person!
I have a friend, who is working on his masters. He's wanting to know more about the 1600 eruption of Huaynaputina, he thinks it might be tied to famine in Russia later, which is kinda where he's headed with his thesis. Anything you know of that might be more ... obscure we could point him to? Yes, this is kinda six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon but wikipedia style... but hey, when you know someone into volcanoes... Ealdgyth (talk) 19:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Greetings, Ealdgyth. "Obscure" in the sense of "not involving a country in an ongoing war"? I think 1257 Samalas eruption, 1669 eruption of Mount Etna(someday I was planning to ask you for a review on source usage there. For some reason I think it's actually overusing secondary sources), Mount Okmok's 44BCE eruption, Tofua or Kuwae or whatever caused the 1453 crisis for example. I would love anyone researching the Cerro Blanco (volcano) eruption in 4.2ka but I guess your friend is more interested in the societal effects rather than the climatological ones. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- He's interested in enviromental stuff as it impacts history. I should point out that he's going for a masters in history ("world history" to be specific .. heh). So he's going to be going in that direction, rather than into science. Ealdgyth (talk) 20:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Exactly what I guessed and thus my selection of volcano articles - all of these are suspected or proven to have impacted history. If your friend is interested in history farther back, African humid period may be another thing to consider. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- He's interested in enviromental stuff as it impacts history. I should point out that he's going for a masters in history ("world history" to be specific .. heh). So he's going to be going in that direction, rather than into science. Ealdgyth (talk) 20:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of Lake Estancia
Erik Laykin
You recently removed the temlpate for speedy deletion of Erik Laykin. In your description, you wrote "not spam". The cause for speedy deletion wasn't that this it is spam--it is "because in its current form it serves only to promote or publicise an entity, person, product, or idea, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic." User:Laykin is the main contributor of the article and likely the subject writing about himself. Could you please explain your rationale for removing the template? Thanks. Shoestringnomad (talk) 12:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- The article currently states what jobs this guy had or has. That's not promotion [which is often synonymous with "spam", hence my edit summary], most biographies on Wikipedia give this kind of information. And I don't remember a consensus that an autobiography automatically qualifies as WP:CSD#G11 material. Speedy deletion only applies in clear cut cases and this one is a long way from being one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Why my page of tryst IITD was deleted
I have made that page 5-6 times and everytime it is getting deleted for some reason. Last time it said it is promoting but there was nothing like that. My college(IIT Delhi) is organising tech fest for which i am creating a wiki page. IIT Bombay has similar techfest Page but it is there without any problem and out page (Tryst IITD) is getting deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehil4 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Because you keep writing it like an ad. E.g
With a foot fall of more than 60,000 in the previous edition, TRYST has been one of the prominent events around the country for young minds to showcase their talents in the fields of science and innovation while at the same time Explore the latest developments in these areas.
is a bunch of unobjective praise. We only accept articles that are written in a neutral fashion. IIT Bombay is much more neutrally written.Incidentally, I see you have only created the page twice. Are you the same person as User:Tryst IITD? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes and I Made 4-5 other IDs too but it is not accepting it. Now do I Have to make the whole page again or is there any way we can get that page without those promotional lines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehil4 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Well, first it helps to come clear on the other IDs - we do not like it when you make more than one identity. You'll need to write up a page that dispassionately describes the topic, and without any copypasting. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Well, see You have mentioned This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (August 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) On IIT Bombay's page also but their page is functional so please at least make our page public and then we can change whatever is necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehil4 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- That page doesn't have a problem as severe as yours. Also, you ought to reply to the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tryst IITD - as I said above making multiple IDs is generally not OK at all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Please tell me What should I do now because I am on a deadline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehil4 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- A couple of things: a) Go to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tryst IITD and tell us what other identities you had, and follow the advice there. b) If and when that is resolved, you ought to try an article that neutrally describes what the festival is, without all the glowing language. c) If that doesn't work, tell whoever is making the deadline that what they are asking for isn't allowed here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Can I show the article to you before uploading on Wikipedia next time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehil4 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think it would be better if you went to WP:AFC there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Why is no one replying anything on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tryst IITD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehil4 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Coropuna scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Coropuna article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 1, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 1, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cerro del Azufre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crater lake.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
TFA
Thank you today for Pali-Aike volcanic field, introduced: "article is about a volcanic field in southernmost Argentina and Chile, which was active until the last few thousands of years. It features numerous lakes - including Laguna Potrok Aike where paleoclimatic research has been carried out - and caves, which were inhabited by the earliest people of the region. Editorial note: I've been sparing with archeological and paleoclimatological details in this article as it's mainly about the volcanic aspects."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Cirrus cloud
Hey Jo-Jo, I saw your comment on the cirrus cloud FAR, and I've seen a number of your earth sciences-related articles in GAN. I was wondering if you would be willing to give me a hand with the prose on the cirrus cloud article, since that seems to be the main sticking point for the FAR, and it is also the part with which I struggle most. (I'm an engineer, not a writer by trade. :) I've done a couple passes based on feedback in the FAR and am hoping to get an extra pair of eyes on it to give me a hand. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 05:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'll try, but my experience with FA-level writing is mostly about stuff I've written myself and others copyedited, not about copyediting already existing text. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Jo-Jo,
This page is showing up in our Speedy Deletion categories as if has been tagged for deletion. But I'm guessing it is not supposed to be deleted? I saw you edited the page and so I hope you know of a way to remove the tagging or, if the page should be deleted, you can delete as an admin action. Thanks for any help clearing up the confusion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, I didn't understand why that happens. I think it might be a problem with the transcluded templates on the db-movedab page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Internet Archive Scholar vs. JSTOR
Hello, I see on your user page that you use JSTOR and I'd like to know more about your experience. By my calculations, a good 70 % of the main JSTOR content is now available for everyone at Internet Archive Scholar, with full text search provided e.g. at https://scholar.archive.org/ . The service is still in beta, but I've used it for some source-finding and it seems quite usable to me; I wonder whether that's just my experience. If you have a chance, the next time you'd be looking for a source on Google Scholar or JSTOR or similar, to perform the same search on IA scholar instead, I'd be curious to hear how it ends up. Thanks, Nemo 19:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of Mount Melbourne
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
TFA nomination
I've nominated Geology of the Lassen volcanic area to rerun at TFA on May 22, 2022. The nomination is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. The blurb could always use review, and feel free to weigh in. Hog Farm Talk 15:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
TFA
Thank you today for Coropuna, "about the highest volcano in Peru, which currently happens to host the largest ice cap of the tropics even though it is retreating like most ice bodies of the world. The volcano itself began forming during the Miocene or Pliocene but activity continued until recent times; two or three eruptions occurred within the last 10,000 years. Aside from its geological and climatological importance, Coropuna was also a holy site of the Inka, which dedicated two archeological sites to it."! --
- Thanks. Coropuna is one of my favourite topics to write about, there is everything from Incas to volcanism to glaciers to paleoclimate on that mountain. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Pingback for past Resource Requests
Hello, Jo-Jo Eumerus. I believe some people have answered some of your past requests on the "Resource Request" page (March 2022).KHR FolkMyth (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll go check it out. By the way, you don't need to ping me on my own talk page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Jo-Jo Eumerus! Your work on Geology of the Lassen volcanic area has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I confess though that this isn't a type of work I'll plan to do frequently. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Macauley Island
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Macauley Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Macauley Island
The article Macauley Island you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Macauley Island for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Macauley Island
The article Macauley Island you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Macauley Island for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gaussberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Drafts and G4
Hi! Re your declined speedy of Draft:Temitope Ogunsemo, I was under the impression that the mention of drafts in the criteria is to prevent a situation where an article that has been userfied,or draftified, ends up being tagged for G4. Looking at my CSD log I count 29 occasions when drafts I've tagged as G4 have been deleted? In this particular example it seems that the draft has simply been copy-and-pasted into a new draft (complete with the notability tag!) Did it look like a 'sufficiently identical; copy to you? Not being able to see the deleted article, I couldn't tell for sure. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sometimes people copy articles into draft space for improvement. I don't think it's straightforward to say that such a draft is a repost for the purpose of G4. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Gaussberg you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gaussberg for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Gaussberg you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gaussberg for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Baratal limestone
Hello! Your submission of Baratal limestone at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Color SEM 4.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
|
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cithara on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Geology of the Lassen volcanic area scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 23 May 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 23, 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Draft:The Jungle Book 2
Hi, I hope you're doing good. I was wondering if you can recover the Jungle Book sequel draft. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chucheraya20 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- The editor claimed to have copied it from here and it seems like the information largely matches. So I wouldn't think it's necessary to restore the draft. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Healy (volcano)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Healy (volcano) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 16:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Desert kite
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Desert kite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eviolite -- Eviolite (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Healy (volcano)
The article Healy (volcano) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Healy (volcano) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 08:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Baratal limestone
On 23 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baratal limestone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Baratal limestone in Russia may be one of the oldest atolls in the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baratal limestone. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Baratal limestone), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 10,525 views (438.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- Well, that's odd. There isn't anything particularly remarkable about Baratal limestone, at least for a layperson. Perhaps it's the "Russia" drawing this attention? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 April 2022
- News and notes: Double trouble
- In the media: The battlegrounds outside and inside Wikipedia
- Special report: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)
- Technology report: 8-year-old attribution issues in Media Viewer
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content from March
- Interview: On a war and a map
- Serendipity: Wikipedia loves photographs, but hates photographers
- Traffic report: Justice Jackson, the Smiths, and an invasion
- News from the WMF: How Smart is the SMART Copyright Act?
- Humour: Really huge message boxes
- From the archives: Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization
Your GA nomination of Desert kite
The article Desert kite you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Desert kite for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eviolite -- Eviolite (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Desert kite
The article Desert kite you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Desert kite for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eviolite -- Eviolite (talk) 15:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)