User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 53
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jo-Jo Eumerus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | → | Archive 60 |
How is 9 keeps and 1 merge not a clear consensus? Nfitz (talk) 00:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Agree, also I did not further a strong Keep argument, however I edited the article. I am usually quite impressed by your closures. Lightburst (talk) 04:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Nfitz: and @Lightburst:: Normally, that sort of thing is indeed a clear consensus. But on Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Consensus generally requires that we factor in all of people's legitimate arguments and not simply counting heads and most keep arguments in this case tended to ignore the WP:OR and redundancy concerns by focusing solely on whether there were sources using the term. And if the nominator's concern had been WP:NEO or WP:N then that would have been enough indeed for an unqualified keep. But it wasn't, there was a concern that a core policy was being violated and too many counterarguments ignored it. And as far as I know, AFD does not have the mandate to ignore these.
- I know it's a bit of an unusual situation and perhaps a "Keep but allow for disambiguation/merge/split discussions" close would be more appropriate. The reason why I didn't go for that is because it would be a somewhat odd conclusion and the aforementioned concern about a core policy issue being disregarded, although I can be convinced otherwise. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- The article content is indeed troubling. I guess I can see the logic here. Nfitz (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted article
Why was this character Shockwave (Transformers)'s article deleted even though he was a major character in the transformers universe. Is there any chance that we can have this page restored? Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart:As you can see from the deletion discussion there was a consensus that it doesn't satisfy the notability criteria for articles of this type. In order to restore it, you'd need to find multiple sources that satisfy these criteria. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Global watchlist - Update 4
Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:
- Recent additions
- A new "fast" mode has been introduced. When used, the watchlist serves as just a list of pages that have been modified, and no longer includes context about the edits themselves.
- More information has been added to entries. When edits are not grouped by page, or when there is only 1 edit to a page, minor and bot flags are shown, as well as the user who made the edit, the summary used, and any tags that were applied. When multiple entries are grouped, bot and minor flags are only shown if all of the grouped edits were made by bots or where marked as minor. If only 1 user edited the page, that user's name is still shown, but no summaries or tags are included.
- All watchlists are now fetched in parallel, rather than in series, greatly reducing load time.
- Technical notes
- Most of the source code is now annotated with jsdoc notes, allowing others to more clearly understand and review the code.
- I will be looking into creating guidelines to let others contribute to the script; see phab:T238298.
- Translations
- There is now proper qqq documentation for translations. Translation takes place at m:User:DannyS712/Global watchlist/Translate, and help is appreciated.
- Newly translated messages are added to the script when I notice them; if you have translated messages that aren't showing up, please let me know at m:User talk:DannyS712.
- Next release
Version 7.0 was just finalized for the development and stable branches of the script.
To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.
Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 16
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Lake Manix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Fault
- Pali-Aike volcanic field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Santa Cruz Province
- Ubinas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Spring
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- The Linter extension helps you find technical errors in articles. It did not show new changes last week. This was because of an API problem. It is now working again. [1]
- Special:Watchlist can show the wrong information again. It does not always show which edits are read and which are unread. This is because of a database problem. The developers are working on solving the problem. [2]
Changes later this week
- You can get email notifications. You can get them immediately, a summary every day or a summary once every week. If you choose a summary you can soon choose not to get notifications you have already marked as read on the wiki. [3]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 December. It will be on all wikis from 19 December (calendar).
Meetings
-
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 18 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The partial blocks feature is now stable. It will come to most wikis on 6 January. Your wiki can ask to wait. Contact NKohli (WMF) if you don't want it now. [4]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
00:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Cheers
|
Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well JJE. MarnetteD|Talk 04:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
- Thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Four Mile Globster
I was going to add this to the AfD before it got closed, but apparently there was a mainstream article in the local metropolitan newspaper in Melbourne at the time, so there was some non-fringe coverage - it's not available online but would be available at a library or newspaper article. So perhaps there is enough for a redirect. Bookscale (talk) 12:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Bookscale:Might be a better idea to add it to Globster#Notable globsters; as for a redirect it can be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas!!
 |
Happy Holiday Cheer!! |
in the spirit of the season. What's especially nice about this digitized version: *it doesn't need water *won't catch fire *and batteries aren't required. |
and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉 |
4 more sleeps
 |
One deleted, one not deleted
I am doing some cleanup work from editor "Amanda Paul" who seems to misunderstand the label "own work" when uploading images.[5] I believe it is a good-faith mistake, because Paul includes the name of the photographer who made the shot in an effort to assign proper credit. That was the case with File:Black & White Handshake - Still from the film Colour Blind (2009).JPG which you just deleted after the discussion here, where credit was given to "Pui San Chan" (someone IMDB lists as official still photographer to the 2009 film Colour Blind.)
Amanda Paul also uploaded another photo from the same film, whose metadata show it comes from the same camera on the same day, "File:Robert_Cavanah_in_Golliwog_Make-up_-_Colour_Blind_2009.jpg". In this case, he/she did not add the photographer's name. I would like your advice on how to proceed concerning this second photo. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- @HouseOfChange: Seems like someone has already nominated it for deletion. The uploader has been inactive for over three years so they probably can't help much. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, I did not see that other discussion. Merry Christmas! HouseOfChange (talk) 19:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
- Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 6 January 2020.
Recent changes
- All mobile site users now have new features. Features include: tabs for page/discussion; an expanded user-menu; direct access to history pages. These features were initially part of the "advanced mode".
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week or next week.
Future changes
- You can use
setlangin the URL to change the user interface language. This will no longer happen automatically. When you open the link you will be asked to confirm the language change. This will not happen if Javascript is not working in your browser. [6]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Korova Milk Bar
Oh I'm sorry, I thought you were german. I'm very confused by the wikipedia website and don't know how to send private messages to user, so I will chat here.
It seems like you deleted the wikipedia article "Korova Milk Bar". Because I was subscribed to the articels of the Korova Milkbar I received the following Email from wikipedia:
Dear TymoBZR,
The Wikipedia page Talk:Korova Milk Bar has been deleted on 23 December 2019 by Jo-Jo Eumerus, see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Korova_Milk_Bar.
Editor's summary: G8: Talk page of deleted page. (XFDcloser)
Contact the editor: mail: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Jo-Jo_Eumerus wiki: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Jo-Jo_Eumerus
There will be no other notifications in case of further activity unless you visit this page while logged in. You could also reset the notification flags for all your watched pages on your watchlist.
Your friendly Wikipedia notification system — Preceding unsigned comment added by TymoBZR (talk • contribs) 17:50, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- @TymoBZR:Greetings. Actually I do speak and read German but even in that language the grammar was mangled and it was not clear whether you were asking for anything.
- Whatamidoing (WMF), do you perchance know whether this notification is controlled by a MediaWiki namespace page? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- The main content of this e-mail message is stored at https://translatewiki.net/wiki/MediaWiki:Enotif_body/en The local copy of MediaWiki:Enotif body was removed; I suggest talking to Dweller or Mr. Stradivarius before trying to re-create it.
- TymoBZR, did you have a question about the article, or about the e-mail message? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF). To whit, the reason why I was asking is because
wiki: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Jo-Jo_Eumerus
is the wrong namespace. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)- I can see that going either way (the userpage might have a list of contact information), but your idea is now immortalized as phab:T241389. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF). To whit, the reason why I was asking is because
There used to be a wiki article for the Korova Milk Bar. Type in Google "korova milk bar wiki"... the first link should be the wiki article, but when you click it, it says "The article that you're looking for doesn't exist". This WAS the link to the article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Korova_Milk_Bar ; I was subscribed to this article. So I got the Email which I already copy pasted the text in here (see above). Now my question is, did you, Jo-Jo_Eumerus, delete the article? Because as far as I understand the Email, you deleted the article. Now if you deleted it, why did you do it? If you did not delete it, I would like to know what the Email is actually saying. By the way, I'm not familiar with wikipedia editing, so I have no clue about formatting this text like you guys do. I hope you get notified anyway if I just put this plain text in here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TymoBZR (talk • contribs) 23:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- @TymoBZR:Yes, I did delete it because of the discussion here which decided that it didn't meet our inclusion criteria. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Ok I understand. Thank you. Happy Christmas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TymoBZR (talk • contribs) 13:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Coropuna FAC
|
The One-third Barnstar | |
| Awarded to User:Jo-Jo Eumerus, User:Fowler&fowler and User:ComplexRational – for having the fortitude, diligence, resilience and "sound moral principle" to show the rest of us the best way to approach a featured article candidacy. Here's to you all three of you! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC) |
Good luck
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはJo-Jo Eumerusたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 02:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited African humid period, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
Quackwatch
The real issue was can Mr barrat be used for a BLP if he is self published. I do not think your close really addresses that as it seems to say yes he is an SPS, but no QW is not.Slatersteven (talk) 13:50, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- Huh? The close does say
articles written on Quackwatch by Stephen Barrett..are considered to be self-published
covering the articles authored by Mr. Barrett andarticles on Quackwatch not authored by Stephen Barrett, the consensus is ... not being self-published
for those not authored by him. As a number of people have pointed out, these two sets of articles are not necessarily equivalent re: self-publishedness. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)- Well I think that the argument will pop up " ahh yes Barrett may be an SPS but QW is reliable so we can use Barrett in BLP's", as it is what caused the original dispute. But you do not seem to think that is the case, fair enough hopefully others will see that as well and I am wrong.Slatersteven (talk) 10:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ohh and BAHHH mumbling Insect!!!!!!!Slatersteven (talk) 10:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Well, the formal question was whether QW was a self-published source not whether it could be used in BLPs. I did write the 4th point to cover this - if Barrett's articles are self published policy strongly cautions against their use in BLPs - but since some arguments in the discussions outside of the RfC were drawing a distinction between " about living people" in the policy and "about medical claims made by living people" and it wasn't the RfC question I didn't feel comfortable making a summary judgment there. If people claim that a source being reliable means that self-publishedness considerations no longer apply then they are quote mining the policies, nothing I can address with the close. I am not sure what the insect thing is about. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Well its better than a humming bug (or in other words a Joyous Winterfestnondemonitialtionalcelebratrion).Slatersteven (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- For what it's worth I took the close as meaning, yes it is reliable as an expert in the field for statements not about BLP. Since WP:BLPSPS says unequivocally
Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the article
. Sorry for popping in like this but I found the close a little misleading and confusing as well. Let me know if my impression of the close matches the intent. PackMecEng (talk) 16:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)- That's correct, although I would not frame it as "reliable...not about BLP" - to me that invites confusion between reliability/unreliability and not-self-publishedness/self-publishedness. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- For what it's worth I took the close as meaning, yes it is reliable as an expert in the field for statements not about BLP. Since WP:BLPSPS says unequivocally
- Well its better than a humming bug (or in other words a Joyous Winterfestnondemonitialtionalcelebratrion).Slatersteven (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
A case to point [[7]].Slatersteven (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- That sounds more like an WP:OSE issue to me than a problem with the close. PsychologistGuy, normally when a source is used inappropriately, it will be removed over time. That it is still present on some articles during the course of the cleanup might mean that the cleanup hasn't reached these articles yet, not that there is any cherrypicking going on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
This [[8]] does say that it was not the conclusion of the RFC.Slatersteven (talk) 17:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Blue-ice area
On 29 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blue-ice area, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that blue-ice areas are places in Antarctica where snow evaporation and wind have exposed blue-colored ice, which often accumulates meteorites (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blue-ice area. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Blue-ice area), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
I was going through DRV and I noticed Eurohound, here are some reliable secondary sources, 101 Ways to Do More with Your Dog: Make Your Dog a Superdog, The Puppy Place #34: Zipper, Amazing Dog Stories, [9] and [10]. Can I get that userfied plus talk page? Valoem talk contrib 22:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Probably better to ask Yunshui for this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 22:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
List of sources to check
No Taylorandfrancis save academy, no Geoscience, no Cambridge, no SeG, no Lyell, no Wiley, no Springer save Pompei und Goethe, no AJS, no Lyell, no Nature. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
Taylor & FrancisGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) GeoScienceWorldGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [22], [23] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) CambridgeGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [24] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) SEG LibraryGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [25] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) LyellGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [26] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) WileyGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) SpringerGreetings, has someone access to these chapters? [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) University of Toronto PressGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [47] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) ScienceDirectGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) AJS OnlineGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [62], [63], [64], [www.ajsonline.org/content/s5-3/14/117.short] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)¨ Gale GroupGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [65] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) JSTORGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [66] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Boll. Acc. Gioenia di Sc. nat. in CataniaGreetings, has someone access to this publication? "Gurrieri G. (1933) - Gallerie e cavita'nella colata lavica etnea del 1669. Boll. Acc. Gioenia di Sc. nat. in Catania, sr. V, (20): 1-20." For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) LyellGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [67] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) NatureGreetings, has someone access to these publications? [68], [69], [70], [71] For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Historical introduction to geologyGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [72]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) A Selection of Cases on InsuranceGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [73]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) The spell of Sicily: the garden of the MediterraneanGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [74]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Die Insel Sicilien in volkswirtschaftlicher kultureller und sozialer BeziehungGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [75]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Sicily, the garden of the Mediterranean: the history, people, institutions, and geography of the islandGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [76]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Medioevo e città: nel Regno di Sicilia e nell'Italia comunaleGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [77]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Alla scoperta di Catania: Guida sentimentale della città etnea. Con 24 tavole fuori testo e una cartinaGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [78]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) A History of Sicily: Medieval Sicily, 800-1713, by D.M. Smith. (B 68-13584)Greetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [79]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Principles of GeologyGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [80]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Volcanoes and society; challenges of coexistenceGreetings, has someone access to "Volcanoes and society: challenges of coexistence. Proceedings of the Kagoshima International Conference on Volcanoes, Kagoshima Prefectural Government and the National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA), Japan, pp. 14-21." For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Mountains of Fire: The Nature of VolcanoesGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [81]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Vulcani attivi della terra: morfologia--dinamismo--prodotti--distribuzione geografica--causeGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [82]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Der Aetna by Wolfgang Sartorius von WalterschausenGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of [83]? For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Catania terremoti e lave dal mondo antico alla fine del NovecentoGreetings, has someone access to the chapters mentioning "1669" or "Etna" of "Boschi E. e Guidoboni E., Catania terremoti e lave dal mondo antico alla fine del Novecento, Roma-Bologna, pp.94-104"? Worldcat points to it here For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Archivio storico per la Sicilia orientaleGreetings, has someone access to "Agata Zuccaro, I monasteri femminili di clausura a Catania nel '600, nelle visite pastorali del vescovo Michelangelo Bonadies (1665-1686), «Archivio storico per la Sicilia orientale», Catania, a. XCI, 1995, I-III." For 1669 Etna eruption Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC) |
I was wondering if you could unlock this so I can restore and add additional sources to the article without going through DRV. The last comment in favor of deletion occurred on Augest 12, 2019 when the article looked like this, there were no reliable sources so no possible outcome other than delete. However TheAwesomeHwyh (talk · contribs) began adding sources on August 14, 2019 and the final version before redirecting looked like this with 4 additional sources which was not taken in the consideration during the AfD. I have found more sources as well giving this significant coverage. Any YouTube channel with a few million subs always has multiple reliable sources, this channel has 68 million subs and is the 3rd most subbed channel on YouTube, please allow me to expand it. Valoem talk contrib 09:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable, but perhaps you might want to write up a draft first. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- User:Valoem/sandbox, I've started a draft in my sandbox which replaces most of the primary sources and added additional information which should pass the requirement for a listed article. Please advise. Valoem talk contrib 03:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- I've lifted the protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- You should probably re-protect it. It looks like the same COI editing has started happening again. TheAwesomeHwyh 21:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- I am pretty certain that in such cases, policy calls for a block ... or since there wasn't a warning, a warning. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- I have given them a custom warning. Though I am still concerned that this one edit may be a herald for a flood of WP:SPI editors soon to come. TheAwesomeHwyh 22:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- I am pretty certain that in such cases, policy calls for a block ... or since there wasn't a warning, a warning. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- You should probably re-protect it. It looks like the same COI editing has started happening again. TheAwesomeHwyh 21:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- I've lifted the protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- User:Valoem/sandbox, I've started a draft in my sandbox which replaces most of the primary sources and added additional information which should pass the requirement for a listed article. Please advise. Valoem talk contrib 03:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg)
-
MMXX Lunar Calendar
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.
– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year
– North America1000 22:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [84]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 January. It will be on all wikis from 9 January (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse question
Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus. Perhaps you can help out the IP who posted WP:THQ#Need a Help. I'm assuming good faith here, but WP:DUCK is always a consideration, particularly since you protected the drafts indefinitely due to SOCK. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Greetings, Marchjuly. I've opened a SPI on that IP here, there are too many similarities for my liking. I am not going to lift the protection myself. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Understand. Whether the IP is another sock I can’t say for sure, but I’m fairly confident that this is not a complete newbie who just stumbled across these drafts by chance or who has never edited before with another account. — Marchjuly (talk) 09:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Saffron Barker
Hi, you closed an AFD about Saffron Barker recently as "retarget" per BLP1E, and on RFD I'm trying to find a better target or clearer solution (=delete), the "one event" was actually the third event on record in enwiki articles. –84.46.52.210 (talk) 11:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Huh. I don't know the topic enough to offer any opinion. However, given that AJ Pritchard#Saffron Barker is about Strictly Come Dancing and we are quite strict on YouTube/vlog things so Social in the City would not necessarily be a notability criterium, I think the case for BLP1E with SCD being the 1E is still strong. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Closer's Barnstar |
| As the nominator of the MfD deletion discussion for Portal:The Simpsons, I'm disappointed in the outcome, but I cannot disagree with your consensus determination and closing rationale. It was an excellent summary, neutrally worded, and completely on point. For that, you are most deserving of The Closer's Barnstar, first awarded to SilkTork by Serial Number 54129 for their closing of the Erica C. Barnett AfD discussion. Credit also to Atsme for their design of the barnstar graphic. Doug Mehus T·C 15:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC) |