User talk:Jmw1959

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jmw1959, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 15:20, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Rocket Man: The Definitive Hits, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I do not doubt the number. I simply ask that you provide a reliable source for verification. Muhandes (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments

While I'm here, some comments about style. Please don't use R.I.A.A. at all. Either use Recording Industry Association of America or RIAA (notice the wikilinks). You can also wikilink Nielsen SoundScan. Neither RIAA nor BPI certify sales, they both certify shipments, which is a different thing. Another note is about the place where you add material. Look at this sentence: "The album was dedicated to Matthew Shepard and Oliver Johnstone, Davey Johnstone's late son. In the U.S. it was certified Gold on 11/5/2001 by the R.I.A.A.", does this make sense to you? What does being dedicated to someone have to do with being certified? If you want to add material, add it so it relates to existing text. By the way, the exact date is usually quite irrelevant to the lead, except where it is unique, say, very much later than the release or on the day of release. In the first case, the year is enough. In the second, the unique point should be mentioned. I hope this helps. --Muhandes (talk) 16:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Rocket Man: The Definitive Hits. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please don't add citation needed templates without providing a source Muhandes (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Little Jeannie. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Please read MOS:DATE and familiarize yourself with how to present a date. I've seen quite a number of edits in which you replaced the proper date with an improper one. Muhandes (talk) 12:22, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

another example. Seems like you created a mountain of work for other editors to fix. Please stop that. --Muhandes (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noted you keep adding "by the RIAA" to certifications. While it is OK to add the certifying body, per WP:ABBR it should be mentioned in its full name, Recording Industry Association of America, at least in the first time it is mentioned in each article. While I'm leaving you a message, I may add that the exact date in which an album is certified it usually meaningless. The year should be enough. Also, please add a source. You can use {{cite certification}} if you wish, see e.g. what I added to Philadelphia Freedom (song). --Muhandes (talk) 12:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you removed a Wikilink to RIAA and a link about the RIAA certification program from the article on Goodbye Yellow Brick Road (song). You did not provide any edit explanation when doing that. Can you please explain your reason for removing these Wikilinks? I think that the average reader might not be familiar with the RIAA and its certification programe, and would find it helpful to find links to provide that information. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Don't Go Breaking My Heart, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. And again, you removed a wikilink, also going against WP:ABBR. You also removed a source without explanation. Please stop that. Muhandes (talk) 09:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:LEAD. The purpose of the lead section is to summarize the article. The dates you add, while correct, and are not required for summarizing the article. --Muhandes (talk) 09:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Technopat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I see that you have already been requested to observe the Wikipedia MoS, in this case Do not insert of between a month and a year (April 2000, not April of 2000). Technopat (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jmw1959. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jmw1959. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jmw1959. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]