User talk:Jleel
Welcome!
[edit]
|
January 2021
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Parler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IHateAccounts (talk) 20:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
I didn’t realise that the truth was uncontructive and vandalism?! That’s wiki for you ..... Wiki needs to pull away from its far left terrorist supporting habits and share truth. Jleel (talk) 20:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shooting of David Dorn, you may be blocked from editing. IHateAccounts (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shooting of David Dorn. IHateAccounts (talk) 23:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:IHateAccounts. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. IHateAccounts (talk) 00:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from removing my edits. I have provided credible links and evidence to rightly state that The “Black Lives Matters” looters were linked to his death. He wife, the police chief and even CNN contradict your article. The looting had not ended before his death, there were multiple looting all over the area and those responsible or his death were exhibiting the same behaviour.
Please update the article to reflect the truth. Jleel (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Your version is not "truth" and does not follow Wikipedia rules and policies such as WP:RS and WP:NPOV. If you want to make edits to the article you will need to gain consensus on the article talk page and stop edit warring. IHateAccounts (talk) 00:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I’m not sure what your problem is but we are all here to ensure the full information about events or incidents is available to the public. Jleel (talk) 00:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- See previous comment. Wikipedia edits and pages must comply with basic wikipedia principles: reliable and verifiable, Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth sourcing, Neutral point of view editing, and so on. You have been attempting POV Pushing, in a particularly egregious way and violating wikipedia policy against edit warring as well as no personal attacks. IHateAccounts (talk) 00:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Fascism and right leaning politics
[edit]Your description contradicts Wikipedia’s article below:
It’s clear from the article and references that fascism is not only found on the right leaning politics.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_fascism
Please edit the article in question so it doesn’t wrongfully just associate fascism with the right leaning politics. Jleel (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- What you are articulating here is, unfortunately, a common misconception. You may find this FAQ helpful: Talk:Fascism/FAQ Generalrelative (talk) 21:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents notification
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jleel appears to be WP:NOTHERE regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. IHateAccounts (talk) 01:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanctions Notification - BLP & AP2 and more
[edit]This is your final warning regarding disruptive editing. I understand that Wikipedia's rules are obnoxious and confusing to even veteran editors. But please stop trying to force your edits and please start discussing things on the articles' talk pages. No one is trying to "censor" anything. We work on consensus and reflecting reliable sources.
Be aware of the following:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
If you continue to be disruptive in either of these areas, I or another admin can enforce discretionary sanctions. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)