User talk:JivanZa
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, JivanZa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Whisperjanes (talk) 04:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Rename of Light Rail Line
[edit]Please note my comments tonight on Talk:CBD_and_South_East_Light_RailFleet Lists (talk) 11:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]September 2021
[edit]Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Minecraft (franchise) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I don't really see your edits as bad faith. However an edit summary would help explain what you're doing. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Nomination for deletion of Template:IWLR
[edit]Template:IWLR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
En dash or no en dash?
[edit]Hey! Clearly this isn't the first time I've encountered you (As evidenced by my reminder to use edit summaries from September 2021), however I disagree with adding the endash to "Nintendo Switch OLED Model". I understand that's how it is officially but I think WP:COMMONNAME would apply and I'm fairly sure most sources will omit the endash. My other reasoning isn't exactly founded in policy but common sense (not necessarily common tho). When I read it with the endash, I read it as "Nintendo Switch (pause) OLED Model" which sounds a bit silly. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:49, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Pixel Tablet/Watch
[edit]Hi there. WP:OFFICIALNAME is only one of the many reasons I listed for why I don't think we should be including "Google". First of all, this is how it's been done for Pixel articles for years, from Pixel 2 to Pixel Slate to Pixel Buds to Pixel Buds. Same goes for the Nexus series, from Nexus 5 to Nexus Q to Nexus 7 (2012). So we should be as consistent as possible. Secondly, this just flows better without "Google" because (a) it's obvious to most readers, and (b) the lead sentence already says "... developed by Google", making it redundant to add "Google" to the beginning of the sentence. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Those are the only mobile devices that uses "Google" in it's official name, and WP:OFFICIALNAME and WP:CONCISE are about the Article titles which I did not change. Jivan (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Technically not true. While I'm aware Google is for some reason including "Google" in the Pixel Watch and Tablet in their marketing more prominently than in the past, they have called their other devices "Google Pixel ____" too and those are technically their official names. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Mojang Studios logo 2020.png listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mojang Studios logo 2020.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)