User talk:JimmyS900
|
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anwar Rasheed photo.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Anwar Rasheed photo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Ordinary movie poster.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Ordinary movie poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:Nidra movie poster.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:Nidra movie poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
July 2012
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Take It To The Head. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing this website, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:The logo of Temple Fox School of Business.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:The logo of Temple Fox School of Business.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Listin Stephen photo.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Listin Stephen photo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Listin Stephen photo.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Listin Stephen photo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
"–present" in a date range implies ongoing
[edit]I've reverted your edit to Dileep (actor). Per the personal life section of the article, he is still married; showing the date as 1998–present makes it clear that he is still married. Changing the date to 1998–2014 suggests to the reader that the marriage has ended. If that's the case, you need to provide reliable sources for the claim. —C.Fred (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spadikam (1995 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vijay Yesudas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vijay Yesudas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deva and Vidyasagar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ustad Hotel audio.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Ustad Hotel audio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
February 2016
[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Action Hero Biju. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] It's not our job to pull summaries of critical response out of thin air. Such summaries need to be directly attributed to specific, respected voices, i.e. reliable sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
May 2016
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Nivin Pauly, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Diffs: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:55, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for all your contributions to the article Dulquer Salmaan. Could you please help in expanding the section 'In the media'? I'll need your help... Thanks! JosephJames 06:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 2 June
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Jayaram page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, please familiarize yourself with the instructions at Template:Infobox film. This edit at Kammatti Paadam contravenes the guidelines, specifically WP:FILMRELEASE. Additionally, this is the second time I'm mentioning that you are misusing the minor edit checkbox. Please only click this box if you are making superficial changes, like fixing typos, removing inappropriate boldface, adding punctuation, and cosmetic changes that could not be the subject of dispute. The above would not qualify as minor, neither would this edit. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Wikilinking
[edit]Hi there, I've reverted portions of your edit here. As a general practice we do not wrap wikilinks around years. One reason, is that it creates a WP:SEAOFBLUE in the lead. See also WP:OVERLINK. You will not find many (if any) featured articles with links from the years. See 300 (film), Greed (film), Gemini (2002 Tamil film), Chandralekha (1948 film), etc. If you think that a link to List of Tamil films of 2016 or Indian cinema belong in the article, the best place for that would probably be in a See also section, which encourages reader to explore tangential topics. We typically link to the primary topics in the lead. We would typically point to India when using a wikilink for "Indian", because that is the subject the reader is most likely to be curious about when reading "Indian". Likewise, if we are referencing a Tamil-language film, the Tamil language would be the primary topic, not Tamil films, which is tangential. A person is far more likely to see "Tamil-language" and be curious about the language than about films released in that language. You're free to discuss here or on the article's talk page if you wish. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did at Charlie (2015 Malayalam film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Last warning re: minor edits and unsourced, subjective content
[edit]Hi there, these are not minor edits [4][5] because you are adding and changing content that could be the subject of dispute. Per WP:MINOR:
"A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, formatting and presentational changes, and rearrangements of text without modification of its content. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. An edit of this kind is marked in its page's revision history with a lower case, bolded "m" character (m)."
Mismarking edits as minor can look to other editors as an attempt to escape scrutiny by hiding disputable content in a package that should only be used for cosmetic changes. Please consider this your last warning about the mis-marking of edits as minor. It would be a really silly thing to be blocked for, and it's completely avoidable, considering you have to go out of your way to click the Minor edit checkbox.
Additionally, please don't change genres without providing a reliable source. Genres are subjective labels, and we're not interested in editors opinions on subjective matters, as this would constitute original research. Per WP:FILMLEAD:
"At minimum, the opening sentence should identify the title of the film, the year of its public release, and the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified."
Part of making it verifiable, is the addition of references. You have been asked several times to stop adding unsourced content. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:06, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Award ribbons in infobox
[edit]What precedent are you considering when you add award ribbons in the infobox as you have done here for the Padma Bhushan? I don't see that this is in wide usage, and I'm of the opinion that it draws undue attention to certain awards over others, thus, I think you need to achieve consensus via discussion in some central place before adding these to the infobox. I see articles about decorated military leaders that don't have these ribbons, so I don't comprehend the value of having them for artsy civilians. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)- Diff: [6] Unsourced genre. Mislabeled as minor. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
JimmyS900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It is not disruptive editing. I will add a link if given an option to do or if I'm unblocked. I have the right source or link. I did not think the current genre added to the Sethupathi (film) on the original article was completely accurate. I apologize if it was disruptive. Anyway, I will immediately add the source to my edits from now on.
Decline reason:
You were warned several times (here on this page) not to introduce unsourced content, but you ignored all warnings. You also ignored warnings not to label your edits as minor when they are not. I don't trust you that you will now change the behavior. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'm going to let another admin look at this. What is also problematic is that in 1500 edits and numerous notes on your talk page, it took a block for you to finally respond. I don't see any edits from you on any other talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I don't do this as a job. I do it in my free time. I don't know any of the formalities associated with it. Anyway in regards to your question, I have not reverted any of the changes you made in places such as Tamil films or Charlie. Have I? Once I saw your messages on it, I did not proceed to edit it further. My intention is only the well being of the article. To make it look better and as informative as possible. I make edits on pages where I feel like there is something off about them. There is so much other vandalism happening elsewhere. But I personally feel like you got some type of grudge against me. User talk:JimmyS900 09:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- You're free to feel however you wish to feel. That's on you. There are well-established guidelines and policies and common behaviors that people who edit here need to participate in. If you do what consensus has asked that you do, you aren't likely to be hassled. If you do what you want to do contrary to community consensus, you're going to run into people like me who have to instruct you on proper editing. If you remain silent as though you aren't part of a community editing project, then you attract negative attention to yourself. Yes, there's vandalism out there, and I could be dealing with that instead of wasting time explaining to you multiple times not to mark your edits as minor, not to add unsourced genres, and not to add subjective content to articles. You really hold all the cards here. And this isn't my job either. We're all volunteers at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, JimmyS900. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, JimmyS900. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited K. J. Yesudas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
best known for
[edit]This is weird to put in the lead. Do not add this in the opening of a BLP as you did here and many other articles. It is written when we specifically mention a character or film he/she is best known for; not an entire film industry. --Let There Be Sunshine 14:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit] Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dulquer Salmaan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [7] "He is often regarded as one of the definitive leading men of his generation" is puffery, and unsourced puffery at that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Wikilinks and primary topics
[edit]Re: this, the primary topics (i.e. the ones that readers would expect to click when clicking on the words Telugu or Tamil,) are the languages, not the cinema industry of those languages/ethnicities. People in Brazil may have never seen the word "Telugu" or "Tamil" and would be naturally curious what those words mean. Wikilinks should be used to clarify these concepts, not to direct users to tangential subjects. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Arbitrary edits
[edit]Hi there, re: this, please don't make trivial, arbitrary edits like this without providing a logical rationale. This one in particular, where you move Telugu before Malayalam, despite the actor seemingly having more experience in Malayalam films, just looks like subtle ethnic-warring, which is a problem at Wikipedia.[8][9][10][11] This was probably not your intention, but that's why it's important to communicate our logical rationales via edit summaries. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Keerthy Suresh has acted in more Tamil and Telugu films. That's the fact. I'm not Telugu. So what enthic warring are you talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:F118:6FA0:E9BF:B747:961B:92F4 (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominic Valamanal draft (July 30)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dominic Valamanal draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dominic Valamanal draft, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, JimmyS900!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, JimmyS900. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, JimmyS900. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Dominic Valamanal draft.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Daniel Poovannathil moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Daniel Poovannathil, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catholic Church in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
[edit] Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Syro-Malabar Catholic Church. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. per WP:ERA, do not change between era styles without consensus. Elizium23 (talk) 16:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Poovannathil (October 2)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Poovannathil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel Poovannathil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
October 2019
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)JimmyS900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Apologies on my part for any errors I made as a user. I wish to only contribute more positively to Wikipedia. I will be more careful with my edits from now on. I will be careful to add references on my part. Thanks.
Decline reason:
You were blocked three years ago for pretty much the same thing. What is different this time? Furthermore, I am highly concerned that you are unresponsive to feedback from other editors - the only times you have edited this page is to appeal your blocks. Your next block is likely to be indefinite. MER-C 18:38, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malankara Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apostolic Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church into Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malankara Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apostolic Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Syro Malabar Catholic Church
[edit]Please add Syro Malabar Catholic Church name back to like this The Syro-Malabar Catholic Church (ܥܸܕܬܵܐ ܩܵܬܘܿܠܝܼܩܝܼ ܕܡܲܠܲܒܵܪ ܣܘܼܪܝܵܝܵܐ Edta Qatholiqi D'Malabar Suryaya; മലബാറിലെ സുറിയാനി കത്തോലിക്ക സഭ Mar Yohanan (talk) 01:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Daniel Poovannathil concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Daniel Poovannathil, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Poovannathil
[edit]Hello, JimmyS900. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Poovannathil".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. You have repeatedly inserted unsourced information across multiple articles. You have been previously blocked for this; further activity of this nature will result in a block. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Pbritti (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Got it. Thanks for the warning.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Syro-Malabar Catholic Eparchy of Shamshabad
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Syro-Malabar Catholic Eparchy of Shamshabad, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)