User talk:Jesuspaul502/Archive 1

Archive 1

August 2024

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bajaj Consumer Care. While objective prose about beliefs, organizations, people, products, or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising, or promotion. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I categorically refute the unfounded accusation that my contributions were promotional. Every detail I added was meticulously sourced from Moneycontrol, a highly reputable and authoritative source. Rather than taking the easy route of reverting the entire edit, a more diligent and professional approach would have been to refine any elements that may have appeared promotional. Your blanket reversion was unprofessional and demonstrated a significant lapse in judgment and editorial responsibility. My contributions were drawn exclusively from Moneycontrol's Company History section, and your handling of this matter is concerning. JESUS (talk) 05:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

First, Moneycontrol is a profile written by the company, so it is not an independent source. Statements like "The company has a rich history and a well-established brand presence in the Indian market" are wholly promotional and do not belong in an encyclopedia. I also suggest you stop using ChatGPT. S0091 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Your rejection of Moneycontrol as a legitimate source is not only intellectually lazy but exposes a shocking ignorance of one of the most respected financial references in the industry. The content I provided was rooted in fact, accurately detailing the company's history and market position—something you evidently failed to grasp in your assessment. Your approach to editing, which consists of cherry-picking phrases without regard for context, is a disgrace to the principles of scholarly work. Labeling accurate information as 'promotional' is an attempt to mask your inadequacies as an editor. The language I used was appropriate for an encyclopedia, reflecting the reality of the company’s standing, not a promotional agenda. Your suggestion to stop using ChatGPT is a transparent attempt to divert attention from your failure to engage with the content meaningfully. JESUS (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

2024 Bangladesh Anti-Hindu Violence

I revised the content you added to the article (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=2024_Bangladesh_anti-Hindu_violence&diff=1245080065&oldid=1245079065). When you include references, please ensure all the details are provided to make it a legitimate citation. LeónGonsalvesofGoa (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Your recent editing history at 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead, use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate an intention to continue reverting repeatedly. Za-ari-masen (talk) 06:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

I have been using the talk page to discuss these issues and engage with other editors, but I agree that we should continue focusing on discussion and consensus-building. I will refrain from further reverts and will work on the talk page to resolve the disputes. If we reach an impasse, I’m open to seeking mediation or requesting assistance from a relevant noticeboard. My goal is to contribute constructively, and I hope we can work together to resolve these content issues in line with Wikipedia’s standards. JESUS (talk) 07:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)