User talk:Jesuspaul502
Hello, Jesuspaul502, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
August 2024
[edit]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bajaj Consumer Care. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- I categorically refute the unfounded accusation that my contributions were promotional. Every detail I added was meticulously sourced from Moneycontrol, a highly reputable and authoritative source. Rather than taking the easy route of reverting the entire edit, a more diligent and professional approach would have been to refine any elements that may have appeared promotional. Your blanket reversion was not only unprofessional but also a blatant disregard for the standards of scholarly rigor and collaborative integrity. My contributions were drawn exclusively from Moneycontrol's Company History section, and your handling of this matter reflects a significant lapse in judgment and editorial responsibility. JESUS (talk) 05:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- First Moneycontrol is a profile written by the company so no not an independent source and statements like "The company has a rich history and a well-established brand presence in the Indian market.", "Bajaj Consumer Care Limited offers a diverse portfolio of well-established brands in the personal care and consumer goods sector. These brands have been integral to the company's market presence and consumer appeal.", "These brands represent Bajaj Consumer Care’s commitment to delivering high-quality products that meet the diverse needs of its consumers. Through continuous innovation and adherence to quality standards, the company has solidified its position as a trusted name in personal care." are wholly promotional and do not belong in an encyclopedia. I also suggest to stop using ChatGPT. S0091 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Your baseless rejection of Moneycontrol as a legitimate source is not only intellectually lazy but exposes a shocking ignorance of one of the most respected financial references in the industry. The content I provided was rooted in fact, accurately detailing the company's history and market position—something you evidently failed to grasp in your superficial assessment.Your approach to editing, which consists of cherry-picking phrases without any regard for context or factual basis, is a disgrace to the principles of scholarly work. Labeling accurate and well-documented information as 'promotional' is nothing short of a pathetic attempt to mask your own inadequacies as an editor. The language I used was entirely appropriate for an encyclopedia, reflecting the reality of the company’s standing, not some imagined promotional agenda that exists only in your mind.Your irrelevant and condescending suggestion to stop using ChatGPT is a transparent attempt to divert attention from your own failure to engage with the content in any meaningful way. The real issue here is your glaring inability to differentiate between factual reporting and promotion, and if this is the quality of editorial oversight you provide, it’s an embarrassment to the platform. Perhaps it is you who should reconsider your role, as your contributions are clearly more damaging than constructive." JESUS (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- First Moneycontrol is a profile written by the company so no not an independent source and statements like "The company has a rich history and a well-established brand presence in the Indian market.", "Bajaj Consumer Care Limited offers a diverse portfolio of well-established brands in the personal care and consumer goods sector. These brands have been integral to the company's market presence and consumer appeal.", "These brands represent Bajaj Consumer Care’s commitment to delivering high-quality products that meet the diverse needs of its consumers. Through continuous innovation and adherence to quality standards, the company has solidified its position as a trusted name in personal care." are wholly promotional and do not belong in an encyclopedia. I also suggest to stop using ChatGPT. S0091 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence
[edit]I revised the content you added to the article (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=2024_Bangladesh_anti-Hindu_violence&diff=1245080065&oldid=1245079065). When you include references, please ensure all the details are provided to make it a legitimate citation. LeónGonsalvesofGoa (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
Your recent editing history at 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Za-ari-masen (talk) 06:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I
- I have been using the talk page to discuss these issues and engage with other editors, but I agree that we should continue focusing on discussion and consensus-building. I will refrain from further reverts and will work on the talk page to resolve the disputes. If we reach an impasse, I’m open to seeking mediation or requesting assistance from a relevant noticeboard.
- Again, my goal is to contribute constructively, and I hope we can work together to resolve these content issues in line with Wikipedia’s standards. JESUS (talk) 07:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)