User talk:Jerry web404

May 2023

Hello, I'm FenrisAureus. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Consultant (medicine) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. - FenrisAureus ▼ (talk) 09:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Indeed Tower seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You may have meant well, but the material you added seemed rather promotional, with WP:PUFFERY, empty boasts (I hope nobody's constructing buildings without the intention of setting them up to meet the needs of the occupants), boasting about the building's importance to Austin, and so on. There may be information worth reintroducing to the article, but ideally it will be neutrally presented. Also, if possible, it would be better to follow more of a prose paragraph style, introducing new topics with sentences, rather than in a summary style with labels and colons. Largoplazo (talk) 22:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About your use of "renowned", "rich history", "extensive experience in the industry": See where, above, I directed you to guidelines on neutrality, WP:NPOV and WP:PUFFERY. Articles may not be used to boost or praise their subjects. They aren't meant to impress the reader with the subject. Avoid empty phrases like the three above that convey no objective information of substance. Largoplazo (talk) 14:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to ABB. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you indefinitely for adding promotional material to Wikipedia. PhilKnight (talk) 14:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]