User talk:JenifferHomes

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Coney Island may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

515/coney-island/2163 Coney Island - Park, Ferris Wheel, Sight seeing] |accessdate=May 1, 2011}}</ref>
and [[Riegelmann Boardwalk]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hjjeCGxUaU |title=[MV] GAIN, HYUNGWOO(가인, 조형우) _ Brunch |publisher=YouTube |date=2013-04-07 |accessdate=2014-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Currumbin Beach Vikings Surf Life Saving Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Currumbin Beach Vikings Surf Life Saving Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 12:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Personal injury lawyer. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 16:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Your userpage, with its service award and barnstars, is deceptive. You have 34 edits. (Now perhaps you've edited under a different username, in which case you may have received such awards, but then you'd know that multiple user accounts are not allowed except in certain situations.) What you put on your user page is up to you. But you should know that editors who look at it will view you with distrust. I recommend you clean up the material. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Total loss. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The citation you provided did not have the stated material. – S. Rich (talk) 16:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Customer service advisor. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – S. Rich (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Your edit history shows a pattern of spamming and disruptive edits. This is your final warning. – S. Rich (talk) 17:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently using Wikipedia for spam. Virtually every edit you have ever made has added unambiguously promotional links. You have continued doing this despite numerous messages explaining to you that doing so is unacceptable. You have certainly seen those messages, as you have removed some of them from this page. It is remarkable that you were not blocked long ago, as you should have been. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User claimed via UTRS 56225 that their account was compromised. 331dot (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]