User talk:Jeeteshvaishya

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suvigya Sharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miniature paintings. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Golden Book of World Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golden Book of World Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Book of World Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 11:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Shrikanthv:, I have added news reference. Hope, It helped the article to get improved. I believe this article should not be deleted as several news references i have cited to the article. Thank you.--Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello Jeeteshvaishya. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jeeteshvaishya. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jeeteshvaishya|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. —SpacemanSpiff 12:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SpacemanSpiff:, Thanks for leaving me a message. Well, I'm not involved in paid editing. Sir, I have given brief clarification on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Thank you. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 12:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rajesh Baniya

The article Rajesh Baniya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article was filled with padded references that did not even mention the person or were from user submitted sites. No real sources available for the finding, he was a fourth place finisher at the Mumbai city level Sudoku championship

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 19:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saurabh Dudeja

The article Saurabh Dudeja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only reliable source available for finding is this short suburb supplement of the Delhi edition of Hindustan Times. All other sources that were included were reference padding of shopping websites and PR releases. No other sources for finding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 20:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Less media coverage, might i have thought wrong that this author should have Wikipedia article. as it has very less references, and only one reliable source that is from Hindustan Times. Go for it, delete it. Thank you. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 08:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Love You Forever Only In That Way

The article Love You Forever Only In That Way has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reference padding, on cleaning up one source in the suburb supplement of the Delhi edition of Hindustan Times was left over, nothing else in RS for the finding. COIN investigation too.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 20:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajesh Baniya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rajesh Baniya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 22:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Yes, You can delete it. As it has not good references. I have thought wrong that this person should have article. Go for it. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 08:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bajrang Bahadur Singh

The article Bajrang Bahadur Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extraordinarily weak sourcing, seems to be some kind of memoir by niece of the subject placed on Wikipedia by an undeclared paid editor. Propose deletion to be replaced by properly written article, if someone so desires.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 02:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianhe: I have objection with deletion of this article because as per Wikipedia rules, he passes notability guideline. Bajrang Bahadur, a ruler of Bhadri estate, had served LG of Himachal Pradesh. He was one freedom fighter and one of the important personality his time. I have found a lot references on Google Book, See here. I will try to improve this article. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 08:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Paul Myers (entrepreneur)

added a link pointing to North Shore

Suvigya Sharma

added a link pointing to Sketching

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for promotional editing and probable undisclosed paid editing (which violates wikipedia's Term of Use) over a period of several years, based on both off-wiki and behavioral evidence some of which is discussed here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 16:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asia Book of Records

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asia Book of Records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. LaMona (talk) 10:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of India Book of Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India Book of Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Book of Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brianhe (talk) 19:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anuraag Pandey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anuraag Pandey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuraag Pandey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Dharmadhyaksha: Dear, Suspection and Assumption does not prove any allegation. Before nominating any article for deletion at least you should check by googling about the subject. I really do not care whether article Anuraag Pandey exist or remain. But the issue is, you should at least try to improve the article if it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria rather than nominating it for deletion. Well, I have found enough sources to improve the article but I'm helpless to Wikipedia as i cannot make any edit. Provide me opportunity to improve the article, as even i concerns about Wikipedia. I have now read several rules and regulation, till now i was unaware. Thank You.--Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 16:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may present all those reliable sources over here and i can take them to AfD if they really are worth. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dharmadhyaksha:

I pasting here what i have got from Google Search and Google News,

Important & Reliable News Sources

May be not much Important because photo is only there

Sources with short mention about subject

News from less important publication As you said "radioandmusic.com is part of Indiantelevision.com, which is a promotional site and notability of it has been questioned many times on wiki and consensus has been that it is non-RS. (Personally I would use these sites only for referring trivial things, like personal information through interviews published there; but not to establish notability.)"

Okay, These references can be added for personal info. Well, When i was creating this article that time i was not knowing which news is reliable and important. If i was knowing, sure i would have gone with reliable sources like HT, Indian Express and all.

Thank You, Dharmadhyaksha.--Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 15:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My clarification

@SpacemanSpiff:, @Abecedare:, @Brianhe:, @DGG:

Hello, I’m back, was bit busy due to Ganpati Fgestival and some study related college work. Well, It is very unfair that even I was not given chance to give clarifications at COI Noticeboard and was blocked. So, I’m putting my points here.

I am still not getting why you guys are making baseless allegations and assumptions like Bloomocrats might be a bigger enterprise and all. I already cleared it that it is a Web Designing and Software developing company, which is yet officially not declared of its establishment, and you have witnessed its unmanaged under constructing blog/website. I think it clearly shows that how much we are serious about it or not.

And I saw sock puppet investigation about me. Sad, but again I want to let you know that I do not have any sock puppet account at all. And Yes, I told you about my alternative account and accepted it that I have user:Jeeteshroxx account, For what I have explained the reason as it was created, Once I had lost password of my this account and later was recovered password from a rough book where I have written passwords of my Gmail, FB, Twitter etc. That time I was not aware about that Wikipedia doesn’t allow you to use two accounts. When I came to know about this rule, I stopped using jeeteshroxx as you can see I am not using that account since long.

And I repeatedly told about my villager friend Rahul (whose nickname is Ratunj), And let me tell you that his Wikipedia user ID is User:Ratunj Tripathi. He has not much knowledge of Wikipedia editing. If he has edited article Raghuraj Pratap Singh, the only reason is Raghuraj Pratap Singh is MLA of our native hometown. I do not know about other accounts which are mentioned in Sock puppet investigation. Yet I didn’t understand on what basis these names have appeared.

Yes, I created article about novelist Saurabh Dudeja, when I had read his debuted novel and personally I liked his book. So I created his article as being inspired with his writing. But there was no any intention to promote him at all. Believe me that time I was not aware about much rules and regulations of Wikipedia and even that time even I hadn’t read WP:Notability guidelines properly. Well, Now I started reading so many rules so that I can understand Wikipedia much better. I’m sure if I knew Wikipedia’s notability guidelines properly, I would never have created this author’s Wikipedia article. I went through from article history and I’m much sure, later who has contributed to author’s article might be associated with him and tried to promote him.

And one more thing I would like to mention, Guys please be clear about Bloomocrats, as it is only a Web designing & Software developing and also makes android apps, it is not a PR Agency at all. This company is going to set up at online (not at physical office) by my village friend Rahul. Right now he is not much concentrated about company because as he is much busy in his personal life. And that blog/website, which was created and maintained by himself only, was unmanaged and under constructed. This shows that how much we (as he taken me because I have bit knowledge about Web designing) are serious about Bloomocrats or how much not. Well as of now, He (Rahul) has done some work of creating websites, which can be seen when you Google about Bloomocrats. Till now, I’m engaged with this IT company by words only as he’s my friend. Till now haven’t worked in designing any website as busy with my studies. Bloomocrats is nothing except an online IT company, which is not officially declared about its establishment, as right now no one has time to be focused on company. Here, I tried to explain my clarification. I hope you people understand. (As of maybe my English is not so good, I tried to explain my points).

Anyway, I agree that articles created by me, in which some might be promotional or subject of Non notability, the only reason is that I was not much aware about Wikipedia’s rules and its guidelines. Now, I have started reading several policies and rules, from which till now I was unaware. It’s great that getting so many things in detail about Wikipedia. By reading several norms, I came to know that on Wikipedia there are several such articles which do not even meet Wikipedia’s General Notability Guidelines. I realized this article should be deleted. In future, I would like to improve articles created by me or would also nominate those articles for deletion which do not meet Wikipedia’s norms. Soon, will request for unblock.

Wells, Sirs. I do not have problem, if you want to investigate more then proceed. I would try to co-operate every possible thing from my side. By reading several policies I came to know that whatever is being done by you people is not harassment. It is only matter of your concerns about Wikipedia. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 14:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Myers (entrepreneur)

The article Paul Myers (entrepreneur) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO for two reasons. Notability amounts to WP:BLP1E tied to a specific large donation, and is of merely local interest.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose : @Brianhe:, First I want to let you know that Suspection and Assumption does not prove any allegation. I'm blocked and can not make any edit, it doesn't mean that you nominate my created pages.

Paul Myers has received unconditional News coverage (Independent and secondary sources) of prestigious news publication, received International attention for record breaking donation. He is also owner an oldest British Columbia-owned mechanical company. Right now i googled about him, i saw some more news appeared about him and came to know about him that he is a recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Vancouver Regional Construction Association, Myers is a former director of the Construction Labour Relations Association of BC (CLR) and the Mechanical Industrial Relations Association (MIRA).

See:

Huge significant media coverage in several prestigious news publication about a single event doesn't shows merely a local interest. He has gathered international attention by donating record breaking donation.

Basically, It passes WP:GNG, & WP:BLP1E as it clearly mentions "If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event." And as of my knowledge, once it fulfill WP:NG, No questions appears. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jagdish Vyom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jagdish Vyom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagdish Vyom (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Brianhe (talk) 06:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bharat Gaurav Award

The article Bharat Gaurav Award has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Part of a paid COIN activity; all "sources" are regurgitated press releases, prior content even had PR pieces quoted in the voice of a notable newspaper. No real coverage of this award, in fact the "coverage" it has in terms of the PR Wire/Business Wire recycles is factually inaccurate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 07:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeeteshvaishya, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 15:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vinita Kinra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vinita Kinra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinita Kinra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suvigya Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suvigya Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvigya Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vishnu Mishra

The article Vishnu Mishra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

zero evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mitthulal Agrahari

The article Mitthulal Agrahari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insufficient basis for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharti Shriji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharti Shriji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharti Shriji (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharti Shriji

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bharti Shriji, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Abesam (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mitthulal Agrahari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitthulal Agrahari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitthulal Agrahari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Uday Pratap Singh (Bhadri) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uday Pratap Singh (Bhadri) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uday Pratap Singh (Bhadri) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jethwarp (talk) 01:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Som Chand Gupta

The article Som Chand Gupta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ram Das Gupta

The article Ram Das Gupta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Som Chand Gupta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Som Chand Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Som Chand Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pune International Literary Festival

The article Pune International Literary Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced ad for a non notable festival.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Shadowowl | talk 10:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pune International Literary Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pune International Literary Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pune International Literary Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 18:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pune International Literary Festival

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pune International Literary Festival, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Newslinger (talk) 06:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pune International Literary Festival has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pune International Literary Festival. Thanks! Hobit (talk) 14:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pune International Literary Festival concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pune International Literary Festival, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pune International Literary Festival

Hello, Jeeteshvaishya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pune International Literary Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asia Book of Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asia Book of Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia Book of Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shyam Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shyam Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyam Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. M4DU7 (talk) 06:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Quli Mirza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Quli Mirza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Quli Mirza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Preetykaur761 (talk) 20:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vidup Agrahari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vidup Agrahari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidup Agrahari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 08:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Shyama Charan Agrahari" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shyama Charan Agrahari. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 7#Shyama Charan Agrahari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Venkat TL (talk) 09:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Vaish Federation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Vaish Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Vaish Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 09:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajesh Agrahari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajesh Agrahari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Agrahari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 09:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jamunotri Gupta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamunotri Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamunotri Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 10:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review this Draft

Link is given below 👇 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kohra_(estate) DrhSR (talk) 23:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guru Nanak High School, Mahim

The article Guru Nanak High School, Mahim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. Only a primary source provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lal Pratap Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lal Pratap Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lal Pratap Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RegentsPark (comment) 16:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kamakshi Devi Temple, Pratapgarh

The article Kamakshi Devi Temple, Pratapgarh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]