User talk:Jdthelegend

Please stop the vandalism

Hi Jdthelegend

I would please ask you to stop tampering with the Oasis page. I have already stated in the discussion for that page why those edits must remain in place for the time being. The others agree as well. Things must be done under Wikipedia policy. Judging by other comments on your discussion page here, it seems you have somewhat of a history of causing vandalism, please stop or I'll have to report you and I really do not want to do that. Have a good day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by InformationViewer (talk • contribs) 00:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

Your recent edits have been reverted. Do not remove sources and place artists into higher sections. Bear in mind that all artists must be supported by highly reliable sources. If you continue making similar alterations to the article they will constitute vandalism to the article and will be treated as such. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not inflate estimated sales figures. Did you read my reply to you in my talk-page?--Harout72 (talk) 22:07, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yh i did http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertainment/music/reviews/some-might-say-oasis-are-still-world-beaters-after-slane-gig-14351086.html read it at the bottom it says 70 million records worldwide not 50 anymore so i suggest you change it or i will.

The sales figure of Oasis will not be changed to 70 million as I have clearly explained to you in my talk-page as to why the sales figure presented by Washington Post is correct, not to mention that we are to aim at the most reliable sources.--Harout72 (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

but why would belfast telegraph but that then why publish something that isn't untrue news and besides it's not gonna stay 50 million for long anyway.

Why do you think some news services publish 750 million and some publish 350 million for Michael Jackson? All of them published during the same year. The answer is simple, for promotional purposes. It's the same thing with the 70 million for Oasis published by The Belfast Telegraph, which is exaggerated by 15-20 million. --Harout72 (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what's michael jackson got to do with all this i'm on about oasis well it's on the official oasis page and someone has put the belfast telegraph link too to show they have sold over 70 million records worldwide and like i say it's not gonna stay 50 million for long i can assure you!!!!!.

Official sites tend to exaggerate figures and so do many news services including The Belfast Telegraph. And I assure you that their current maximum of 50 million is not going to turn into 70 million over a period of few months, I have shown you how weak their sales is outside of UK. It will take good few years at least for Oasis to sell another 20 million records.--Harout72 (talk) 23:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well like i say it isn't gonna stay 50 million for long so and when it is says they have sold 60 million 70 million or whatever be prepared to change it or i will.

I suggest you dial back your attitude first. Second I suggest you prepare yourself to discuss any changes that you'd think that need to be made. Published figures are scrutinized through certification databases as they are not necessarily correct. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i'm fine thanks very much and i will discuss things that need to be changed near the time.

Football player articles.

Can you wait till a football match is finished before doing stats updates in the infoboxes. Govvy (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LINKING

Hi, please note that well-known geographical names such as London and UK should not generally be linked. See "The Who". Tony (talk) 06:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from John Lennon's musical instruments. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 17:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance template

I've reverted your edit at Noel Fielding because the date should record when the template was first edit. Have a look at Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup for more information. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 21:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Free Peace

A tag has been placed on Free Peace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steamroller Assault (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]