User talk:Jd101991

Bayview Golf & Country Club moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bayview Golf & Country Club. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Killarnee (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! I didn't know how to make it a draft so all good! Jd101991 (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Survivor 47 has been accepted

Survivor 47, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 20:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jd101991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I try to do is make wikepedia better but it is tough when a user ike bgsu98 is reverting your edits 24/7. Only me no one else. They do it because they know I am right and beat them too it. For example, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#c-Jd101991-20240821155100-Schazjmd-20240821154900 in that link I wrote something which is true. Someone else a month ago spoilered text that had no source and it has not been taken down yet. If I did that it wouldve been taken down minutes after it was written. We have had incidents in the past and I am the one being looked at and never them. I have reported and that's only came back to me. I like helping out on wikipedia, but they are making me miserable. If you wish to not do anything about this, let me know why. Thank you. (@Bbb23) Jd101991 (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This clearly demonstrates you do not know what is wrong with your edits and strongly indicates your block needs to be extended significantly until such a time as you clearly understand WP:EW and WP:CONSENSUS. Let me know if you think 2 weeks is enough time for you to clearly understand the problem with your edits, or if instead you need more time to read our policies. In the future, unblock requests should only address your actions, not those of other users. Yamla (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]