User talk:Jazzmonke

This is Jazzmonke's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Jazzmonke, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andy Penkow (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andy Penkow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jazzmonke! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andy Penkow has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andy Penkow. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andy Penkow has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andy Penkow. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello Jazzmonke. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jazzmonke. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jazzmonke|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i am not being paid for this article in any means, this is my first wikipedia article and i wanted to make sure i am writing about a person that i am familiar with and in accordance with my taste in music. I have personally reached out to andy penkow to get permission to write this and has been working on it for about three weeks now. Please excuse the nature of my language since it is my firat encyclopedic brief. I will make sure that required edits are done properly, in accordance to your regulations. once again please excuse me for the honest mistakes I may have done, I am happy to make changes to make sure this article is in a presentable manner to wikipedia. thanks. Jazzmonke (talk) 13:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot claim the image as your own personal work unless you took the image. Copyright typically rests with the photographer, not the person depicted, so the image may not be Mr. Penkow's to give away, unless his contract with the photographer assigns him the copyright. If he does hold the copyright, the easiest thing to do would be for Mr. Penkow to upload the image to Commons himself. There are other methods but that's the easiest.

You will need to declare an (unpaid) conflict of interest. Articles are typically written without any involvement from, or even the knowledge of, the subject.

Mr. Penkow might want to read WP:PROUD and be fully aware of what he is getting into. There are good reasons to not want an article(though he cannot deny permission either).

Images are not relevant to the draft approval process, which only considers the text and sources. You don't need to worry about images until the draft is accepted and placed in the encylopedia. 331dot (talk) 13:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have rewritten it entirely and I hope these edits must be enough. Is there any further suggestions you might have to make the article better?

Thanks Jazzmonke (talk) 14:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andy Penkow (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andy Penkow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 12:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andy Penkow has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andy Penkow. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andy Penkow (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paul W were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At least two of the sources appear to interviews of the subject, and "The general rule is that any statements made by interviewees about themselves, their activities, or anything they are connected to is considered to have come from a primary source and is also non-independent material" (see WP:INTERVIEWS). As a minimum, the article needs significant coverage, by sources with reputations for fact-checking and accuracy (not passing mentions, not blogs, not routine coverage by events promoting his appearance, etc), that isn't interview-based and which report his achievements independently.

I note that other editors have also raised a potential COI (see WP:COI), to which the main contributor to the article should respond, as it materially relates to the neutrality and balance of the content.

The article also includes no wikilinks to other articles (as such, it is a WP:deadend), and also embeds two external links, which should be removed per WP:EL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andy Penkow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 14:09, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul, thanks for your review, I have again done my edit accordingly. Further more, I have already responded for the COI. I am not financially or otherwise being paid for the content that I am trying to publish. I want to become an active contributor for the Wikipedia community, and andy penkow is an artist that i have followed for a while since country music is my domain. Please review my article and let me know if anything needs further edits. thanks Jazzmonke (talk) 14:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andy Penkow

Hello, Jazzmonke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andy Penkow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]