Jump to content

User talk:Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Rayman Garden for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rayman Garden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayman Garden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. In order to give all the games of the Rayman series a review, I did the post of the game Rayman Garden. Could you explain why the post broke any policies or guidelines. Maybe I need to be enlighten in some rule that I missed. Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal (talk) 21:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Metabarcoding for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metabarcoding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metabarcoding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Daiyusha (talk) 05:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. North America1000 16:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
Writing articles
The community
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rayman Bowlling (February 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not sufficiently notable. Please incorporate information into main Rayman article in the game's section instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I would try to improve the article for notability issues. The Rayman general post need this small post for complete information, but maybe you are right and it is not possible to give it a post alone itself. Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal (talk) 15:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rayman Mini (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This game is notable, but the article needs more time in the oven. A reception section with the reviews the game received would be best with the Jeuxvideo and Multiplayer.it sources added to prove notability. There is also a making-of at Pocketgamer that could be added as part of a "Development" section.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kukun (March 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 05:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 05:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kukun (April 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Devonian Wombat. Thanks for the feedback. I had this problem before. I thought I fixed it from my first version. Can you please, tell me what is the exact problem? None of all references have any value? It would fix it if I a give a try for more references? I read the guidelines and I thought I made it right this time. Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rayman Mini has been accepted

[edit]
Rayman Mini, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kukun (June 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ken Tony were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Even after the repeated rejections with the same reason as stated above, there is no progress in the draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 16:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I thought my last edition surpassed the problems of the previous drafts. I will drop this draft for now, but I am thankful for your message. This last submission last too much time for revision. Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alliance Française de México for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Française de México is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Française de México until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 16:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 143.255.87.131. Place any further information here. Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I declare that I have not used any ip or proxy change application when I have had to edit my contributions to wikipedia. I have used Opera's default vpn in my browser, but it is not in use when I edit for wikipedia. For any who judge this, give me the right feed back if a I broke any rule, but please do not block me if a made a unconscious error.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alliance Française de Silicon Valley has been accepted

[edit]
Alliance Française de Silicon Valley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Deb (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Published mirrors

[edit]

Howdy! Please be more careful with your sourcing. I've removed multiple instances (here, here and here) where you've added a citation to a "book" published by PediaPress, which are all simple copies of Wikipedia articles. These are usually clearly labeled and you can see the authors as "Wikipedians". Thanks.Sam Kuru (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the warning. I was concerned about this in the second change. I though the last add I made was good, but maybe I have to search better. I will be more careful. JAHC (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You also added a source like that in this edit. If a source contains the exact same text as a Wikipedia article, it's either copying Wikipedia and should not be used as a source (as in this case), or it shows that the Wikipedia article is a copyright violation (and the violating text should be deleted). //Replayful (talk | contribs) 21:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Javier_Alejandro_Herrera_Carvajal&oldid=1228550345"