User talk:Jattlife121

Contact

Hey do you have an email i can contact you on thanks Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 02:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sikhism in Brazil has been accepted

Sikhism in Brazil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sant Isher Singh (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GraziePrego were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sant Isher Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 05:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jattlife121! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 05:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Not Like Us (song): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Adam Black ^{talk • contributions} 19:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jattlife121 (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your recent editing history at Sidhu Moose Wala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thedarkknightli (talk) 01:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Black (talk • contribs) 02:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sant Isher Singh

Hello, Jattlife121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sant Isher Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a Friendly Suggestion

Hello man first of all glad to meet you for first time and thank for your heartwarming contribution towards our sikh community to confreres your support for the integrity and brotherhood of our sikh youth, but I eagerly want your name from Jattlife to something more professional or genuine terminology to get some better social conjunction. Thats what i wana say its upon you thanks anyway approve me for any delightful discussion for our upcoming commitment agian appreciate your jatt brother from another mother! 59.89.22.144 (talk) 22:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate the advice.

Wikipedia is only a hobby of mine and I have no personal gain/social status I want from this.

Thanks. Jattlife121 (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro coincidentally I felt the same concern regarding your user name denomination if I genuinely analysis your course of Interest it’s simply related to the Sikh religious matter by far your name look quite caste Pov motivated but still you haven’t contribute any significant assessment toward Jatt Community thus before inclosing my statement I want to include its highly depend upon you our duty is just consolidate you about the name convention that stsभारतसरकार-विभाग (talk) भारतसरकार-विभाग (talk) 02:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Changing_username Here the link if you need any detail acquisition

We want to ensure Jat integrity enhancement and well-being of our community if you determined your decision I will definitely asses you with my kind intervention approach me if you want consider me as on purpose again thanks alot with my dear concern भारतसरकार-विभाग (talk) 02:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jattlife121,

You seem to have gotten multiple messages from accounts later blocked as sockpuppets. Thank you for looking out for Wikipedia's integrity rather than being influenced bad actors. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

POV intervention of Maplesyrupsushi

Bro if you don’t realise the core intention of the user I mentioned on you talk interface is highly dubious and have tone of interaction to devalue the hegemony of Jatt articles in his recent time period he was the one of suspicious user to oversight the sidhu article to regressively hijack its perimeter add the fabricated origin theory of Bhatti Rajput you can double check @MaplesyrupSushi you will explicitly find his manipulative agenda to surpass the integrity of Jatt so in conclusion As an individual from Jatt community I don’t recommend to interact with this guy anymore until amd unless you should try to convince about his miserable behaviour toward Jat article!! Have a nice day hope you will understand his mental illness Chauhan community Patroler (talk) 03:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chauhan community Patroler - Your caste-based POV pushing and promotion is against Wikipedia policies on neutrality and verifiability. I will do all I can to ensure Wikipedia remains a reliable encyclopedia, not one where people make unverified claims regarding caste to boost their ego. Perhaps websites like Jatland.com are more suited for you. I will report you to the admins if you make baseless accusations against me again. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 03:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

first of all I don’t create any misconceptions but it seems you are trying to whitewashing your bad faith edit on Wikipedia if you don’t have have a enough info regarding the Jatt affiliated topic. it’s my friendly request to maintain a considerable distance from the topic regardless of your poor mental obsession apart from this you are the one of example of jat phonic individual which can be determinate by various unwanted occasion for trying attempt to abduct Jat subset on Wikipedia Chauhan community Patroler (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can give you reality check via various interaction timeline proof of x user

Just few [1] [2] without any cap edit Chauhan community Patroler (talk) 16:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro please leave me and @MaplesyrupSushi from this online discussion. If there is a bigger issue you need resolving please ask a Wikipedia Admin, but your claims seem to be quite incorrect.

Also, Jatt is also not a caste but a sub-ethnic group. Jattlife121 (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature of Sant Isher Singh

Hey bro, I came across an image of Sant Isher Singh's signature: [3]

Will be good to add it to your draft article after it is published :) MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 23:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hoping it does get published lol. Usually all my pages have no issues, just bad actors are probably behind this getting denied. Some reason they won't accept Indian sources lol or they were saying the tone was at fault which was strange.

If you could please add a picture of him which i can add to draft that would be great. I really hope this time it gets approved, i'm just waiting right now to see what they say. Jattlife121 (talk) 22:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the signature though, and feel free to add to Draft:Sant Isher Singh Jattlife121 (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikhism in South America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hindu American Foundation. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have posted this on the wrong page.

How can the edits be unconstructive when they are well sourced. The person removing hasn't even bothered to detail what this problem is. This same person, has been promoting the page for over the past year. Clear bias involved. Will escalate further. Jattlife121 (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not disputing your content. You can see I already restored it here. The actual problems with you are:

You are not following WP:BRD. You were required to leave a talk page message explaining your edits instead of restoring them. There is no activity on talk page from you.
You should not call just any revert a "vandalism" like you did here. You must read WP:NOTVANDAL.

These are the reasons why I posted the above warning. Hope you understand. Thanks Ratnahastin (talk) 03:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok understood, thanks. In those initials edits, I've given the response of the organisation to each point made, which is fair on their end, to ensure it follows Wikipedia neutrality. Jattlife121 (talk) 03:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would still recommend you to post a message on Talk:Hindu American Foundation and explain why your edits should be kept. By doing this, you help yourself by strenghtening the credibility of your edits here. Ratnahastin (talk) 03:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]