Talk:Hindu American Foundation
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hindu American Foundation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
Ffs ...
[edit]Above-average competence is expected if you are to edit a controversial article —
- Rajagopal, who heads HfHR — a competing NGO in the Hindu activism space in USA — and has been (unsuccessfully) sued by HAF, is not a proper source to use in the controversy section; neither is a propaganda paper from Turkey!
- Mukta Joshi's recent report should have been used to buttress the already existing section on "pro-India advocacy" than create one, afresh, titled "Accusations of lobbying efforts to influence U.S. Policy". It ought to be obvious but do not write w/o reading what's already there in the article.
- The content that was added to "Islamophobia allegations" is already covered — and notably, in a detailed manner — at the section on "Reception"; so, there was no need to create a subsection titled "Islamophobia allegations".
- Clarion India and Sikh Coalition are not reliable sources. (I am yet to read the other source used to draft a section on the supposed targeting of American Sikh community.)
TrangaBellam (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- +1. also WP:CONTROVERSY suggests against giant controversy sections Bluethricecreamman (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- did not know clarion is nonRS. whoops Bluethricecreamman (talk) 14:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Article Copyediting by the Guild of Copy Editors
[edit]Done
This article is currently being copyedited by the Guild of Copy Editors. If you have any questions about the copyedits, or if there is any mistake that I have made, feel free to post it under this section. Once it is complete, I will update the icon above. Thank you TNM101 (chat) 16:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Completed Copyediting TNM101 (chat) 07:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)