User talk:JatinJalandra

This is JatinJalandra's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://phree.co/about.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:JatinJalandra/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was spam and deleted per {{db-g11}} as such. – Athaenara ✉ 17:47, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello, JatinJalandra! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://phree.co/about.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:JatinJalandra/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, JatinJalandra. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 18:49, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 18:49, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I was editing for the first time and trying to learn.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JatinJalandra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Very sorry for what i did. I was using Wikipedia for the first time as an editor and was just trying to learn so i put some old documents on the page just to see how it comes out. It was a naive mistake. I promise i will not be doing copy pasting anymore. Also, when the question was presented asking if i had a relation with what i am writing about, i really thought i was supposed to say 'yes' and only then it will be accepted. Till date i believed that people and organisations made their Wikipedia pages by themselves. I later read carefully and realized what it really was and how biases come into play.

Please, if you could just give me another chance. One more.

I apologize again.

Thanks and Regards.JatinJalandra (talk) 23:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have great difficulty believing that you mistakenly identified yourself as having a conflict of interest and mistakenly copied and posted documents from the company. Maybe someone else will accept that easily, but not me. In any event, if you want to edit about topics that are unrelated to Yogananda Films LLP, please tell what those would be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did not mistakenly identified myself as having conflict of interest. I did it falsely and that too deliberately (Which ofcourse i shouldn't have). I really thought i was supposed to say 'yes' to the question if i was associated with the company and only then it will be accepted. I believed that people and organisations made their Wikipedia pages by themselves and didn't know i was doing the right thing by being an independent source. I copy-pasted as it seemed easy and was a stupid mistake to take Wikipedia so lightly. For my whole life i found info on this site itself and thought this is how it works. I am an idiot for not going through your regulations religiously. I might edit more topics in the future and will never work again on Yogananda films i promise. Please change my ban to atleast a finite time so that i can serve my punishment and then be allowed back on the site as a changed man. An indefinite block of my ID and IP address just feels too harsh. You can check my edit history, i've hardly even edited anything except that one page for which i rightly got two strikes. Please help me and accept my request, i promise to be better.

You may make another request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]