User talk:Jaszen
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jaszen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I think you might benefit from having a refresher on Neutral Point of View policy in here. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Soni (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Dark Night Rises
[edit]
Refrain from any further disruption at The Dark Knight Rises. You were warned on December 3, January 1, and January 2. There were also several lengthy discussions on the article talk page, resulting in a clear consensus against the claim you were trying to add to the article. Then recently, you attempted to add similar information to the Critical response section on two separate occasions here and here. It doesn't matter if it's in the lead or body of the article, the arguments against inclusion cover both. Editors have even weighed in again in opposition at Talk:The Dark Knight Rises#Critically one of the best of 2012.
Continuing to disrupt the page could result in the loss of editing privileges. Adding any claim that is similar to the one already discussed, in any shape or form, will be considered disruptive. You are strongly advised at this point to obtain consensus through discussion prior to doing so. Also be aware that wasting the community's time is a form of disruption, so it would be in your best interest to avoid rehashing the same discussion all over again. Only do so when you have something significantly different to bring to the table that was not recently discussed. --GoneIn60 (talk) 07:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: Deleting this warning message will be taken as evidence that you have read its contents, in accordance with WP:OWNTALK.
Concern regarding User:Jaszen/sandbox
[edit]
Hello, Jaszen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Jaszen/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.