User talk:Jarussingh

Welcome!

Hello, Jarussingh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Draft:Mr tsk did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr tsk (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks sourcing, neutrality.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr tsk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jarussingh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dainik jagra is a verified news channel in india's so please you can go and check. he has published there is nothing false or worng in this Jarussingh (talk) 18:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr tsk (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr tsk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mr tsk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mr tsk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr V K Singh (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The submission appears to be written in Hindi. This is the English-language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English-language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Hindi Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr V K Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dr V K Singh

Hello, Jarussingh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr V K Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dr V K Singh

Hello, Jarussingh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dr V K Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Tsk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mr Tsk. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces

Sir, please guide me as to how I should write any article so that it does not appear promotional. Am I writing right, what should I do, what should I pay more attention to so that it is the right way because whoever I am writing, be it an actor or a singer or a politician, he is removed. Sir, I request you to tell me some way how. Let it be written. Jarussingh (talk) 11:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I can assure you that I understand how it feels when you're trying to do something and it all gets deleted or removed, it can be very frustrating. But don't you think that if you're doing the right thing, nobody will delete or remove your input?

First off and importantly, if you have a conflict of interest with the articles you're trying to create, you have to disclose it. The conflict of interest were talking about here can be either you are an employee of the person/people/organisation you're trying to write about, which means you're getting paid to create these articles or at minimum, you are writing about yourself/family member/relations, etc. Please read WP:COI because Wikipedia takes this very seriously. Read the information at WP:COIEDIT to guide you on how to disclose your COI.

Another important you MUST consider before venturing into creating biography of living persons is the general notability guideline, this might read very strange but it is the bedrock of inclusion on Wikipedia. There are also specific notability guidelines, for example, an article about a politician MUST pass at least one criterion of all the criteria listed at WP:NPOL.

An article about a singer must pass at least one of the criteria listed at WP:NSINGER. You can browse through several specific notability guidelines at WP:N.

Please read all these links, understand them before considering venturing into creating articles, and importantly, if you have a COI, disclose it per WP:COIDISCLOSE.

Hope you will find the information useful. Regards, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces Thank you very much sir. I have understood and you must be absolutely sure sir, I am an art student, I write poetry and stories, sir, whatever actor or singer I try to write about is considered promotional. But I have understood that whenever I Sir, if I write, I will write only after taking your opinion. I am very satisfied after talking to you and your explanation sir. Jarussingh (talk) 15:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces

Sir, I write only on the basis of what is there in the news article or on the website and it becomes promotional because it is a little entertaining and emotional. Jarussingh (talk) 15:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to address the part that there's no need of calling me "sir", lol, I'm just an editor like you. If the article you wrote is considered promotional because it is based on the media entries the person gets, that is when the WP:OWNWORDS comes into play. You should know the words to watch when writing an encyclopaedia entry, especial the meaning of MOS:WEASELWORD, MOS:PUFFERY and MOS:EDITORIAL.

I will also highly recommend the articles for creation process because there are many friendly editors there who will guide you, give your draft a second eye to spot issues and tell you how to fix them before helping you publish the article to mainspace, instead of writing directly on mainspace which is what you currently do.

Feel free to always reach out and I don't mind giving your creations a second eye before publishing to mainspace, but like I said earlier, you can always use WP:AfC process.

Regards, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr Tsk (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr Tsk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Mr Tsk. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mr Tsk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mr Tsk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing

Sir, I know that I am new in this field, there may be some problems in my writing but it is completely true, whatever I have written, you can Google it. Sir, he is an actor and has also acted in many films. But sir, I don't understand at all how this can be personal publicity or something else. Please tell me and guide me as to which way I should write or how to write it so that it can be correct. Jarussingh (talk) 10:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you cannot recognize when you have added promotional content, perhaps it would be best if you not write about this subject until you can edit non promotionally. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing

Of course it is possible, but sir, I have seen and read many Wikipedia articles and then there may be something written like that which may seem promotional, so sir, should only that graph be removed or the entire article. Jarussingh (talk) 11:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, because I have tried many times to write about many actors, singers and politicians but every time I am told this. I request you to please guide me. Jarussingh (talk) 11:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My advice to you is a) to stop trying to push this Mr Tsk/tsk, as you're sailing very close to the proverbial wind and risk getting blocked, and b) read and understand WP:AUTOBIO and WP:PROMOTION. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to follow the links in the deletion notice to guide you in not writing promotional content. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jarussingh. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Mr Tsk has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jarussingh! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:11, Thursday, December 28, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge