Jump to content

User talk:Janj9088

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Janj9088! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 05:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Kazimierz Mięsowicz moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Kazimierz Mięsowicz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Military history

[edit]

104 Batalion Schutzmannschaft moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, 104 Batalion Schutzmannschaft, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mikołaj Kunicki moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Mikołaj Kunicki, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:30, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Tom's Organization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this (informal?) organization is notable, cited source does not even use such a term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kazimierz Mięsowicz

[edit]

Hello, Janj9088. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kazimierz Mięsowicz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Janj9088. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "104 Batalion Schutzmannschaft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mikołaj Kunicki

[edit]

Hello, Janj9088. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mikołaj Kunicki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bolesław Wierzbica

[edit]

Hello, Janj9088,

Thank you for creating Bolesław Wierzbica.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Bolesław Wierzbica, but please consider adding historical material to the article on behalf of interested readers. Right now, the article does little more than mention his basic existence.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the warning at the top of Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland and self-revert there: "Editors who are deemed to be properly aware of discretionary sanctions and who violate these restrictions may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened an request regarding your edits

[edit]

[1] --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Bolesław Wierzbica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails GNG/NBIO/WP:NCRIMINAL. No in-depth coverage outside primary sources, reference used are court documents.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

April 2020

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (help!) 15:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lie! See IP and logs. I suspect it's a multi-account Piotrus Or other nationalist-moderator. Janj9088 (talk) 15:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It has been set up so that the edition does not pass. Janj9088 (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have arranged for this to be undeleted. Please expand it with reliable sources. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here

Topic ban from the Eastern Europe topic area

[edit]

Per this complaint, the following discretionary sanction now applies to you: a topic ban from the the Eastern Europe topic area, broadly construed, for one year. Sorry, but your conduct has fallen too short. Appeals options are available at the WP:AE page. Thanks in advance for your close attention. El_C 20:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have been injured, you do not want to check the IP of my account and the other one. I based the sources only on books. Websites are trusted and also redirect to reliable sources. This fake account was created by Piotrus. Check his IP and logs. Janj9088 (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and disruptive editing.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 21:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tom's Organization

[edit]

Hello, Janj9088. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom's Organization".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Janj9088. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]