User talk:James Robert Elkins

Speedy deletion nomination of The Atlantean Journal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Atlantean Journal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 08:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Broadsheet. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Atlantean Journal

Hello James Robert Elkins,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Atlantean Journal for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pranish|^Talk 08:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, James Robert Elkins, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. JQTriple7 ^talk 08:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saint Vera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saint Vera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 08:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of magazines in the United Kingdom. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Saint Vera. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 09:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Southampton Media

Hello James Robert Elkins,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Southampton Media for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Media of the United Kingdom. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article Southampton Media. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest and advertising

Please stop creating articles for non-notable websites (all of which are behind a pay-wall) and whose sole object is to drive traffic to them. Both Saint Vera and The Atlantean Journal are products of Southampton Media [1], an enterprise established less than 6 months ago and owned by James Robert Elkins [2], with multiple attempts at fundraising via Crowdfunder UK, all of which ended in late April, all of them unsuccessful [3]. The "company" behind this enterprise, "Zenetta Capital", i.e. the Crowdfunder UK profile of James Elkins, is not even registered at Companies House. Please read the notability criteria for websites and, more importantly, please read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest and abide by them scrupulously. Note that the creation of such articles wastes hours of volunteer time and and if persistent can get you blocked as an "advertising-only account" which would be unfortunate. Voceditenore (talk) 11:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Voceditenore, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]