User talk:JamesMatthewBaillie

Nomination of Cambridge Tolkien Society for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cambridge Tolkien Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Tolkien Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 02:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cambridge University Science Fiction Society

The article Cambridge University Science Fiction Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 17:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cambridge University Science Fiction Society for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cambridge University Science Fiction Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge University Science Fiction Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zoe O'Connell

Hi, I'm Slatersteven. JamesMatthewBaillie, thanks for creating Zoe O'Connell!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Not really seeing a lot of in depth coverage.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Slatersteven (talk) 12:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Breckland District Council election, 2007

Hi, I'm Boleyn. JamesMatthewBaillie, thanks for creating Breckland District Council election, 2007!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has beent agged as uncategorised and lacking a clear references section.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Election articles

Thanks for creating the articles on Breckland DC elections. Please remember to add the articles to categories (e.g. Category:English local elections, 2011 and 2011). Cheers, Number 5 7 15:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Lucy Wright (Folk Artist), from its old location at User:JamesMatthewBaillie/Lucy Wright (Folk Artist). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Wright (Folk Artist) (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucy Wright (Folk Artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamesMatthewBaillie! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucy Wright (Folk Artist)

Hello, JamesMatthewBaillie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucy Wright (Folk Artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucy Wright (Folk Artist)

Hello, JamesMatthewBaillie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lucy Wright".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]