User talk:Jack Sparrow 3
Welcome!
Hello, Jack Sparrow 3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
content forking
[edit]Please do not create content forking, as you did at Serbian grammar. The articles were merged through discussion and consensus. If you wish to challenge that consensus, please make a request for discussion, rather than trying to obstruct it. — kwami (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I've reverted your additions to Jean Lafitte and detailed why on the article talk page. Please discuss at the talk page before adding that information again. Karanacs (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Croatian language. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 11:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Notice
[edit]The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Balkans if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision. Courcelles 11:41, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Your block has been extended to 48hours for block evasion. If you are blocked it is not acceptable to get round the block by editing from another account or without logging on to an account. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Edit Warring
[edit]With this edit you have violated the 1RR restriction on Croatian language and will be reported if you do not immediately revert yourself. --Taivo (talk) 14:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GedUK 14:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Edit Warring Block again
[edit]Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
- Owing to persistent disregard for the relevant restrictions, I'm banning you from the Croatian language article indefinitely. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Infobox picture
[edit]Discuss about infobox picture of article "Croats" here.--Wustefuchs (talk) 11:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
ANI notification
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Keristrasza (talk) 12:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Croatian Language
[edit]Not only did you break the ban given to you on the article Croatian language, you then also moved dizzyingly close to breaking the 1RR rule, if not actually breaking it (it could be wikilawyered either way). I'm fairly sure if you don't revert yourself, you'll receive another block, and maybe a more expansive ban. That's my opinion, I guess it's between you and the admins. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 06:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
WARNING
[edit]I have requested that your ban be enforced here.Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Jack_Sparrow_3_.28Croatian_language.29 You may wish to respond. — kwami (talk) 06:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Listen you (whatever you are). You may spread your Nazi propaganda as long as you wish, but you won't do that forever. One day you and your gang of language destroyers will be thrown at the garbage of history, where you belong.--Jack Sparrow 3 (talk) 07:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Blocked for 2 weeks. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Fine. Seeing your latest comment above, you are now blocked indef. Wait until we are all on the garbage heap of history, then you may come back. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:32, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- My last message wasn't for you Fut.Perf., but for that "constructive editor" kwami. And since his falsifications of such simple facts, (like the one that there is no "Serbo-Croatian language"), are considered as "constructive work", how can you expect that anyone take English Wikipedia as serious encyclopedia?--Jack Sparrow 3 (talk) 07:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)