This is an archive of past discussions with User:JGHowes. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Please provide a source for your addition to the Hurricane Fabian article. The article is a featured article, and unsourced additions are discouraged. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, where did it come from? If you do not post a link of where it came from, it will be deleted. We need to know whether that image is usable or not. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the doubt (just saw this link]). I talked to an administrator about it, and he said the best way to do things is if you could email Wikipedia permissions from your workplace. If you're confused, the administrator I talked to was Nilfanion, who'd be able to help you more if needed. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:BDA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot14:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Nnote to file: no action required; file was replaced with better image and should be deleted JGHowestalk -
Yes, I am the mediator (or trying to be...), but I'm new, and I picked too tough a case. The tags aren't used, but there's a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal about that; feel free to join in. Also, I noticed you delete your messages after you delete them. If you want to keep your page clean, you can add them to an archive (instructions on how to do this are availabe on Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page). · AndonicOTalk19:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
The picture in which Muhammad is fixing a stone in Kaba is before even he was prophet and before he started preaching Islam. That cannot be an important enough event in Muhammad life (which is such a great life with so many great events) and for Muslims. --- ALM12:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Goodman
The stuff at the top my user page is free, in fact I borrowed it from someone myself. The Goodman article is way better. If you want to go the next step, GA status, you need info on his early life and career outside scouting. See George Thomas Coker for a GA Scouting bio.Rlevse22:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Photo Caption for Ruth and Gehrig
Anyone who can't distinguish between Ruth and Gehrig must have spent his entire life in a dungeon without TV, radio, books, or newspapers. Also, people are always identified left to right in a photo caption. It is absolutely unnecessary to include (l) and (r) in ANY photo caption.
Proposed replacement of University of Maryland userbox
Since only one userbox per university is allowed here, I'm proposing replacement of the current userbox, because:
the existing oversized userbox doesn't fit standard Wikipedia userbox dimensions
current userbox photo of mascot "Testudo" at the College Park campus is too small to be meaningful in a userbox
the proposed new userbox is more generic of the entire Univ-Md. system, not just the College Park campus
the University of Md.'s official logo features a stylized version of the Maryland state flag – by using only the public domain state flag in my proposed new userbox, we have a symbolic representation of the university without any copyright infringement. JGHowes16:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree with your concept, however, in the spirit of userbox non-proliferation, I highly recommend that you have this discussion on Template talk:user UMD. I have copied your comments there. I also suggest that you be WP:Bold and make your improvements directly to that template. --NThurston18:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Oskar Schindler
Hi. I'm very annoyed by some of your last edits in Schindler's article.
1) "As the advancing Red Army neared Poland in October 1944 ..." - The Red Army entered (pre- 1939) Poland in Jully, in the fall 1944 its advance threatened concentration camps in Silesia and southwest Poland. The original formulation was better.
2) "producing parts for V2" who could wrote such stupidity and why are you copying it? In Brněnec they made some components for the 37mm munition (the factory for munition was in Polička 20 km far from Brněnec).
3) "Those few who managed to escape from the transport trains were also sheltered by Schindler" Schindler never saved the escaped prisoners - all the Jewish workers (there were also Poles in forced labor and some German experts) were to Brněnec transported from concentration camp. See the table in "cs" article about Schindler. It's based on the book of Jitka Gruntová, who makes the research about concentration camp in Brněnec over 20 years. --Honzula10:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, no need to be "very annoyed". I was relying on this source: Herbert Steinhouse, "The Real Oskar Schindler", Saturday Night Magazine, (April, 1994) for the edits I made, as listed in the References.
I might add that you should refrain from using such terms as "such stupidity", this is not the WP:civil tone expected of editors, you know.
Now I some photos of documents with Schindlers topic (the reediting for article will be soon), may be you can be interested, but I cannot put it to wiki because they are copies from book, do you want it to email?--Honzula09:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but another conflict term in Schindler's Article: "Zwittau has since been renamed Svitavy" This is very common Sudetengerman statement, that the "German" places were renamed into Czech after WWII. Actually most of the towns, hills etc. in Czech lands have had both, the German and its Czech alternative (and vice versa). Only very unimportant places or places in ethnicaly "clear" areas have had only German (and were largely renamed after WWII) or only Czech form. The others you can easily identify - 1) they have similar pronounciation or 2) they are literal translations - Svitavy/Zwittau is the 1st option (historically older). I mean, Zwittau had its Czech name at least from begin of 19.cent. but the German name was prefered as 90% of town population spoke German. Honzula19:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject PipeOrgan
Hi there. I noticed from your comments on the talk pages of Douglas Major and Frederick Swann that you were responsible for creating the articles. You may have noticed the WP:PipeOrgan project tag placed on these articles recently, and I wondered whether you would be interested in joining - the Project is still very new and could do with more members. Someone with a knowledge of American organists would be very useful to have on board! If, however, membership of this project doesn't appeal, sorry to disturb. Best wishes, Bencherlite00:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Aviation WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. TrevorMacInnis (Contribs) 15:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, just pointing out that a compromise that had been reached regarding the opening paragraph was that no comparative statements would be made for the Attack on Pearl Harbor page. This would allow for simplicity in reading, and not need a bunch of qualifiers in order to explain the comparatives. In your addition, we would have to add "one of the worst" in the 20th century, during peacetime, terrorist attack, until 9-11, etc. It would get cluttered when we then added comparatives to the Japanese results, to the value of the ships involved, to the loss of life here versus at Hiroshima, etc. We chose to move those details to lower in the article, so that details would not interfere with the first paragraph summary. Not advocating that you remove your change, just asking that you be aware of why your change got such a strong response. CodeCarpenter16:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Please look into a user before reporting that they are committing vandalism. Your report of me to AIV was highly insulting. I have been an established editor on Wikipedia since 2004 and have not had any problem. Therefore, to suddenly find myself accused of "a massive vandalism campaign" is quite alarming. Please read and familiarize yourself with the guideline WP:AGF before accusing any others of vandalism.
It's an easy enough mistake to make, given that you were creating dozens and dozens of the same edits, some of which were questionable (at least they were to me! I'm not the expert, though). The editor above used the word "seems" in the report so it looks like they just reported you to WP:AIV for investigation where you were exonerated. - Alison☺21:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
please the See Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians, and the template talk page for the infobox musical artists. the flag is reserved for place of birth. --emerson7 | Talk23:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Royal Gazette Links
That's a good spot on Ewart Brown, I need to have a sit down and check them all when I have a chance. A few months back the RG changed its website provider, and the directory tree below the www.theroyalgazette.com page was changed, causing all links to sub pages from anywhere to broken. I don't think any articles have been lost from the website, just moved. Have a great day! LeeG14:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I understand what you mean about unreferenced material, my error. I misused the Edit function.
The Royal Gazette link is now fully operational. In fact the controversal article which you deemed better to remove, is on the front page now as the Chief Justice ruled against the gag order, and that it is in the best interest of the public, your own referenced link will take you right to it June 18th
Thank you for your comments to that user. You might observe that all of his entries [1] have been about this TPR subject. I have already talked with admin User:Wknight94 about it some. I'm thinking of reverting all of these changes. What do you think? Wahkeenah16:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
See my comment on the talk page - I think it's better, but it's still sounding like only Al Sharpton and company favored the cancellation, and I don't think that's a neutral presentation. FWIW, I couldn;t take the yahoos on both sides of the issues who were editing this and the companion Imus article, so I'm not inclined to jump in it again right now myself, but I do hope the articles will be improved. I hope this is helpful - I'm not trying to trash the work you're doing. Tvoz|talk17:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:G_Turk2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:G_Turk2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Fair use and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
There is already a section in the article, "Civil rights issues" which does mention the criticism of his policies towards the Jews. If you feel this could be expanded upon, fine. But to conclude he's a "well-documented anti-Semite", however, requires that the "documentation" (by reliable sources) be specifically cited, pro-and-con, to maintain NPOV.JGHowestalk -
License tagging for Image:NYP LOC1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NYP LOC1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Ynote to file – added {{PD-USGov-Interior-HABS}} license tag; (Library of Congress) and digitalID source tag were supplied in original upload; also for NYP_LOC2.jpg, NYP_LOC3.jpg, NYP_LOC4.jpg, and NYP_LOC5.jpg image files JGHowestalk -
re: Why is this an issue?
Because many logged in users and all anonymous (IP) users have no date preferences set. Remember, this encyclopedia is primarily for the readers, not the editors. If someone in the UK or Commonwealth were to find this article using Google or another search engine, they may assume that it is a US-centric site because of US formatted dates. --rogerd14:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Actually
Actually, i have an account, but i keep forgeting to log in, my name is Masterwiki. Anyway, is it possible to keep me always logged in. If so, thank you. If not, oh well.
70.237.215.24123:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC) YTo User:Masterwiki, Hi, after you log-in, click on "My preferences" at the top of the page, then scroll down to "Change password". Under that section, you'll see a box "Remember my Login on my computer". Check that and you'll always be logged in. Of course, this should only be enabled from your own computer that no one else uses. Otherwise, if you're using a public computer such as a school's, everyone will have access to your User account. Let me know if you have any other questions. JGHowestalk - 03:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Pearl Harbor FA review
I've left a comment at Featured article Review noting some porblems with the process and with this particular result. Perhaps you'd care to respond?
On another pedal note, another pipe organ fan who scuba dives. Will wonders never cease!? ww11:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I think that the community would have appreciated some kind of consensus on this before you removed it. I have had no reply to the above message either here or on my own user talk. Neither have you replied to my message on the Franck talk page. This doesn't seem to fit WP:CIVIL. Please read my points and understand that at least three and a half out of your four points have no validity.--Vox Humana 8'14:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
YReply: The use of consensus doesn't apply when a clearcut violation of a Wikipedia policy occurs. Even should editors agree to overlook the "Do Not Use" guidelines spelled out in WP:EL, that doesn't make it permissible. Your use of a sock User:EccentricRichard in lieu of User:Vox Humana 8' to do a third revert must be avoided to remain in good standing. JGHowestalk - 19:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
the license you use isn't one of the "free licenses" i.e. you can'y load it to the commons. I was referring to the gdfl or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} licenses. ----evrik(talk)02:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Just stepping in for a quick comment. The image of the cannon you added to Valley Forge doesn't have a caption. I'm not sure where it's taken, or I'd write something up myself. Would you mind, when you get a chance...? ;) --Midnightdreary03:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I think that image you uploaded of the lighthouse near Florence is actually of the Umpqua River Light. They were built using the same pattern, but if you compare the two you will see that the workrooms are on opposite sides of the towers in relation to the direction of the ocean. (Here's a link that shows both.) Latr, Katr17:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Resolved
Reply: You are right! It is indeed Umpqua River lighthouse. On the back of my photo (which was taken in 1991), I had simply written "Pacific Seacoast lighthouse near Florence, OR". A closer examination (including using a magnifying glass to read a small sign cropped out of the Wikipedia image), positively identifies it as the Umpqua lighthouse. Many thanks for pointing this out. Regards, Jim JGHowestalk - 18:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Glad I could help. It's nice to know that having a head stuffed full of useless trivia comes in handy sometimes. And since the Umpqua River Light article doesn't have an image yet...well, there ya go! Happy editing! Latr, Katr18:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, yes I should have left a comment somewhere. I guess I was too busy clearing the backlog that I forgot. With this image I assume the photographer is the uploader. Or at least not an image somewhere found on the web. An image under a creative commons license is still under copyright, so the (c) notice is ok. I see the "for wiki" more as "I made it for wikipedia", not "only to be used on Wikipedia". Especially since the original uploader tagged the image with the first edit as a creative commons image. Garion96(talk)14:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Was not aware of that, will do first thing Monday morning. But just looked at the OTRS page and I'm fused. I do not see an address or any sort of information on the topic. Can you explain in more detail what we need to do? I'm afraid I'm not very Wiki-savvy. Basilica122:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lou_Gehrig_NIH.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali(talk)19:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BDA logo3.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner.OsamaKBOT15:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot21:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Ynote to file: deletion OK, original image upload attempt returned error msg and uploaded image didn't show, possibly due to server lag (?) JGHowestalk -
The restaurant tower that Rex Humbard started to build and then just left standing was one of the most famous aspects of his life. In all of Ohio and beyond, it has been known as "Rex's Erection" for decades, it is a very famous landmark.
YReply Thx for the msg explaining your edit to Rex Humbard. Certainly good faith edits by anyone are always greatly appreciated. Having said that, however, Wikipedia is one of the Top 10 sites on the internet in terms of daily hits, which number in the millions. As such, we have to be careful that all Articles follow certain guidelines for quality. For example, all information has to be reliably sourced. In a nutshell, that means it must have been printed in a mainstream newspaper or website, etc., and cited in the Article's footnotes. (for details, see WP:RS). Also, Wikipedia is not a collection of "trivia". So although the Rex Humbard article does mention the unfinished tower, I don't see how adding a slang term to describe it adds to the Article's value as an encyclopedic reference. I hope you will understand why it was reverted. Happy editing! JGHowestalk - 19:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hardy palms
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've included a link to a photo album I created last summer with some pics I've taken through the years of hardys in Baltimore. I also included a link to a post by a Baltimore resident of some experience with hardy palms in the Baltimore area.
Image source problem with Image:E Urner Goodman 1917.jpg
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:E Urner Goodman 1917.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI18:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Fixed — clarified source info. provided JGHowestalk - 23:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Here's my first set of suggestions...first, look at Arthur Rose Eldred and George Thomas Coker, both articles I wrote that are also GAs and single person BSA biographies. Make the Goodman article similar in scope and depth of info to these two articles. Then reference every well. When you get there, leave a note on the Goodman talk page and I'll look it over again. Then we'll go from there. Right now, I'd basically say the Goodman article just needs beefing up to get to the GA point. Rlevse 13:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to throw up a stub for the Philadelphia School of Pedagogy. Could you send me that online source you found? Thanks. --evrik(talk)17:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, James, just out of idle curiosity is your attribution-type licence for this image actually compatible with the GFDL? I'm not planning to delete it either way, just wondered if there is a potential problem. Jimfbleak16:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Pres Roosevelt and Boy Scouts in 1937.jpg
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading Image:Pres Roosevelt and Boy Scouts in 1937.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
The image you asked about looks fine to me. THe tag I put on is on the talk page and a Scouting project tag, totally unrelated to licensing. Rlevse20:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:
I don't see how it is "personally targeted behavior that causes an atmosphere of greater conflict and stress. " (from WP:CIVIL). Obscenity is a personal subjective philosophy that I don't subscribe to. -- John Reaves21:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand why you would have clicked on my userpage when you intended to ask me a question. Why wouldn't you just go staright to my talk page? At any rate, what was your question? -- John Reaves21:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:THS logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:THS logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:THS magazine.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:THS magazine.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EPowerBiggs.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:EPowerBiggs.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Deirdre imus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Deirdre imus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:First Rockefeller Center Tree1931.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:First Rockefeller Center Tree1931.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Hi, Alansohn- We seem to keep running into each other on various articles - small world, isn't it? :o)
I've reworded slightly Ocean Grove, New Jersey since your edit, to clarify that although the court quashed OG's status as a separate borough in 1921, the Camp Meeting Assn continued to exercise local ordinance powers for another 60 years (until the newspaper deliveryman sued the Assn in 1981 because he couldn't drive his delivery truck into the Grove on Sundays).
Just didn't want you to think me rude for changing your edit.
It sure is a small world. The original wording implied that that Ocean Grove was ruled unconstitutional as a municipality in 1981. I was reading (and digesting) a New York Times article on the 1981 ruling and I will integrate it with your edits. Thanks for taking the time to clarify the ruling in the article and for the heads up. Alansohn19:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:New Lassie 1989.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:New Lassie 1989.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Hi JG. The Template:Dominionism TfD, on which you commented, has been closed with no consensus (default to keep). Although the TfD debate touched on several issues regarding the form the infobox should now take, much seems unresolved. I invite you to participate in further discussion on this topic. Thank you. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 05:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I have reviewed the article according to the GA criteria and have failed it at this time. I have left a review on the talk page of the article that recommends what sections need to be fixed before the article is nominated again. If you have any questions about the review, please let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. If you disagree with the review, you can seek mediation at Good article reassessment. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
JetBlue Labor Dispute
I re-added the section on the JetBlue labor dispute, sourcing the information from Crain's NY Business Journal. The dispute was also covered in NY Newsday as well. Pipa32bj (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:NRHS logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:NRHS logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot20:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC) N[this is a BOT malfunction, image is not orphaned]
References
No, I actually prefer <references />. The change is part of WP:AWB's general fixes, and for this reason I have turned off "general fixes" in my main "date maintenance tags" run. However, on balance, with the standard headers I decided that the type of article is more likely to benefit from the general fixes. I have also asked the AWB developers to remove this particular feature.
(Note the reason I prefer <references /> is purely the font size.) RichFarmbrough, 18:39 5 December2007 (GMT).
Thank you
I want to thank you for updating the fair use rationale for the Image:Westmoreland Seal.jpg. Normally when I receive notices that the usage is disputed, I will take care of them immediately. However, I am in the process of studying for finals, and did not have time to do anything with it. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 01:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you seem to have a great eye for Good Articles.. Could you take a look at Victor G Bloede and let me know what you think. I'm certain it's not even close to a GA but would be nice to have some pointers on how to improve it the best I can. The biggest problem is the resources. What you see for refs is about it! I can't seem to find much of any I used every bit I could from what little I had. Thanks! --DP67 (talk/contribs)16:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions and advice on Victor G Bloede I'll keep working at it. Although I doubt with such limited references it will be a GA, but still I'd like to make it an interesting article to read. One of the biggest problems I'm having as far as researching his patents and inventions is that most of them where made in the late 19th century to the early 20th century and I cant find any references on them other than what is already written. Any idea where I could find such information on them so I can cite them? I'm sure having only a few references does not help its creditability.
You make a reasonable point. However, you may observe that while I'm the reporter, the disclaimer is an "editor's note". I might actually further suggest changes, since the story is supposed to reflect my reporting but not especially my "opinions" as the disclaimer refers to it. Anyway, I'll mention this to Ral315 and maybe we can improve the standard disclaimer for future instances. --Michael Snow (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
note to file: self-reverted article and orphaned image; informed User:pd_THOR on his Talk page JGHowes talk - 
To User:Masterwiki, Hi, after you log-in, click on "My preferences" at the top of the page, then scroll down to "Change password". Under that section, you'll see a box "Remember my Login on my computer". Check that and you'll always be logged in. Of course, this should only be enabled from your own computer that no one else uses. Otherwise, if you're using a public computer such as a school's, everyone will have access to your User account. Let me know if you have any other questions. JGHowes talk - 03:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Resolved
Fixed — added source/fair use rationale to image page JGHowes talk - 17:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
JGHowes talk - 23:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Fixed — clarified source info. provided JGHowes talk - 23:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[this is a BOT malfunction, image is not orphaned]
){kind=link}
--DP67 (talk/contribs) 07:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
