User talk:JESLabour

Welcome!

Hello, JESLabour, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jack Edward Saunders Reason, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 16:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Edward Saunders Reason

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack Edward Saunders Reason requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - Mr X 16:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JESLabour. You have new messages at Peridon's talk page.
Message added 17:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

At the bottom of the page, where it should be... Standard procedure here. Peridon (talk) 17:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to User:Peridon, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan 17:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Peridon with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yintan 17:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're upset. Read the message at the bottom of my talk page and remember that worse things happen in the political world. Treat this as a learning experience. Peridon (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At REFUND, it's best to give an explanation of why you think the article should be restored. Peridon (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to message at my page, You're welcome. If you'd got blocked for vandalism (as does happen sometimes), I was planning to unblock you. I've been called worse, and will be again, too. I get worried if no-one's shouted at me for some time. If you're involved with committees (I have been...) and/or politics, you need to develop a reasonably thick skin (but not a thick head as some seem to...). Now, you weren't making a bad job of the article, saving the main problem.. We're always looking for more people who can edit, Can Type WithOut Irrelevant Capitals, and can create articles. Take a look around. Find a red-link but not Squidge Darting because I just made that up. See if you can make a short article about it. Read the policies. Get to know what's what. You don't have to be on every day - five minutes a week is acceptable if it does some good. Ask if you want to have a go. Then, you can tell your secretary how to do it when the day comes... Peridon (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JESLabour, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi JESLabour! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack ES Reason

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack ES Reason requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Peridon (talk) 21:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jack ES Reason, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 21:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jack ES Reason. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't

Don't remove speedy deletion tags on articles you have created. This is not allowed. Also, please get the message that you don't pass WP:BIO yet despite your political activities. See WP:POLITICIAN and WP:RS about reliable independent sources. Finally, don't repost your article until you can without any shadow of doubt pass the requirements policies. You are heading close to being blocked from editing. Peridon (talk) 21:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop posting articles about yourself

Peridon (talk · contribs) went to some lengths explaining to you why you shouldn't write an article about yourself. You seem not to have paid attention. Please do, before you find your editing privileges revoked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JESLabour, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— MusikAnimal ^talk 23:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keith Bobbin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Keith Bobbin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Keith Bobbin. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 00:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Latest article

I'm afraid that county or borough councillors don't make the grade. Nothing much less than MP or equivalent. And most of them will already have articles. Try updating some of the existing articles if they need it. Remember to comply with WP:BLP and WP:RS. Editing on Wikipedia is a glory trail for some - but they can come unstuck. Doing tidy-ups and correcting typos isn't glorious, but you learn a lot. Look at (but don't yet post at...) places like WP:AN and WP:ANI. Whole different world from the article space. Peridon (talk) 10:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rs chen 7754 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]