User talk:J. Lunau

Eckersdorf

Ja, ich habe so viele Seiten gemacht, daß ich mich nicht an alle errinern kann. Zu der Zeit, war ich mit einem Project Seiten für alle deutsche Gemeinden herzustellen.

Ihre erweiterungen sind ganz nutzvoll. Ich habe einige Änderungen gemacht, um dem Wikipedia Stil anzupassen, und auch die "stub" Bezeichnung entfernt.

Vielen Dank! Ksnow (talk) 02:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Kasnow[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, J. Lunau. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page FIAMM, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Praxidicae, there is no conflict to be managed about my person! I am a normal Wikipedia user, occasionally doing some edits. Please explain, what is causing you to set me under the susipicion, having any confilict of intrests? In my opinion it is unfriendly treatment, to accause other editors having COI! --J. Lunau (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

J. Lunau can you clarify how this logo is your own work in that case? Thanks!Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can find all informations about the SVG-graphic I generated with the program Inkscape on the correspondening discription page on commons! J. Lunau (talk) 15:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Long Breakup

The article The Long Breakup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found, minor awards. Tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katya Soldak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katya Soldak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katya Soldak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 20:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the notability of Katya Soldak as a journalist: on January 17, 2023 she moderated a panel in Davos at Ukraine House Davos titled "Defending Our Freedom: Ukrainian Bravery on the Frontline" in https://twitter.com/UKRHouseDavos/status/1613083288393891840/photo/2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QO3O32AzN4

Since the beginning of the war, she's been covering the news in Ukraine daily and weekly in her Forbes digest: https://www.forbes.com/sites/katyasoldak/?sh=1f6fd62716db Lermanalexandra (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Lermanalexandra, I have added it to the article. Please take part at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Katya_Soldak and let us know, if you want to keep the article!

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]