User talk:Ivasykus

Welcome

Hello Ivasykus, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Ivasykus, good luck, and have fun. --Shinerunner (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deception Point

Hi. Please do not add unsourced material or original research to articles, as you did with these edits to Deception Point, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of No Original Research and Verifiability. There is no such edition mentioned at the source you cited. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 08:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interlanguage links

Hi, re this edit; please note that per WP:WDATA, all interlanguage links are now stored in Wikidata - see d:Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/An Adventure in Space and Time. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The city of the heroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Hug. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Standalone film

The article Standalone film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a dictionary definition, and a poorly written one that synthesizes derived terms that are not actually in the sources (which themselves don't define the term at art, just use two common words together).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

You were rudely not notified by Oknazevad (talk · contribs) of this proposed deletion, so here's the PROD for you to check it out. 82.26.59.181 (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I thought I had clicked the link for a bot to send a notification, but apparently I forgot. oknazevad (talk) 17:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. I'm pretty sure that such thing as "standalone film" deserves for an article in Wiki, because it is commonly used in media. But I agree that it should be bigger and better sourced. Also my English is not good enough, so I ask You to help me to improve this article. Sincerely --Ivasykus (talk) 17:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sofiia Lyskun

The article Sofiia Lyskun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:NATHLETE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hello, Ivasykus. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sofiia Lyskun, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sofiia Lyskun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sofiia Lyskun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofiia Lyskun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Ivasykus. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. That's ok, I've got it. It's hard for me to find sources in English, so I will be really glad for any help. Sincerely, --Ivasykus (talk) 22:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm Erik. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tom Glynn-Carney, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ivasykus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nathan McMullen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paint Your Wagon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jackson Robert Scott

Hello, Ivasykus,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Jackson Robert Scott should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Robert Scott .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ivasykus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bandersnatch

Hi! I'm sorry to have been going around reverting all of your edits, but we simply can't start articles and sections about television content which hasn't been released yet, per WP:CRYSTAL. A draft for the article already exists in a hidden comment at the redirect Black Mirror: Bandersnatch, and you are welcome to expand it with reliably sourced material. — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 14:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Ivasykus (talk) 14:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Oleh Serbin

Hello, Ivasykus,

Thank you for creating Oleh Serbin.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe 06:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 19:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arkhip Kuindzhi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also please be aware of WP:3RR. Another revert may result in a block. Mellk (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Arkhip Kuindzhi, you may be blocked from editing. Mellk (talk) 10:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghost of Kyiv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghost of Kyiv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost of Kyiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lightspecs (talk) 13:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at uxx. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Also the {{flagg|uxx|blank}} blank template is not used as that creates a white flag and the players do no play under a white flag... they play under "no" flag. We used {{flagicon|}} instead in tournaments. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist there is a difference between "white flag" and "no flag", then just use "no flag". Russian tennis players do not represent Russia now, they represent no country, so the Russian flag can't be used. Ivasykus (talk) 12:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We use no flag for tournaments, as the ATP stated. But their software is broken because it's all or nothing... even players from years ago. We remove the flag from all tournaments but not from rankings, especially because pert of this year their flag is allowed even at tournaments. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing flag icons

We can't use the ATP website for this because they removed the flags from all years in their history, which is a fabrication. Their software doesn't allow them the ability to remove the flags only for tournaments. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]